Demand-responsive Lighting – A Field Study

Abstract Demand-responsive buildings utilize control mechanisms to reduce their electricity use during periods of high grid-wide demand, primarily to aid utilities in maintaining grid stability. Dimming lighting is proposed as one such demand response mechanism, and several laboratory studies have explored the speed and extent of dimming that is either noticeable or acceptable to occupants. We conducted a field study to examine whether these laboratory findings could be applied in real buildings with commercial lighting control systems. The study, conducted during summer months, included an open-plan office with 330 dimmable luminaires, and a college campus with 2300 dimmable luminaires across several buildings. In the office building we conducted two afternoon demand response trials, which dimmed lights by up to 35 percent over 15–30 minutes. The power reduction achieved was 5.2 kW (23 percent), and 5.3 kW (24 percent), respectively. At the campus site we conducted three afternoon demand response trials, which dimmed lights by up to 40 percent over 1–30 minutes. The power reduction achieved was 15.2 kW (18 percent), 7.7 kW (14 percent), and 11.3 kW (15 percent), respectively. There were no lighting-related complaints to facilities management throughout the afternoons of the trials. Based on prior laboratory studies and this field study we suggest guidelines for dimming lighting as a demand response strategy.

[1]  Stephen Selkowitz,et al.  The New York Times headquarters daylighting mockup: Monitored performance of the daylighting control system , 2006 .

[2]  Jennifer A. Veitch,et al.  CHOICE, PERCEIVED CONTROL, AND PERFORMANCE DECREMENTS IN THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT , 1996 .

[3]  Guy R. Newsham,et al.  Lighting quality and energy-efficiency effects on task performance , 1998 .

[4]  C. Mandil Light's labour's lost : policies for energy-efficient lighting , 2006 .

[5]  Alice M. Agogino,et al.  Intelligent Office Lighting: Demand-Responsive Conditioning and Increased User Satisfaction , 2006 .

[6]  Sila Kiliccote,et al.  Dynamic Controls for Energy Efficiency and Demand Response: Framework Concepts and a New Construction Study Case in New York , 2006 .

[7]  Hamish Fraser,et al.  Market Power and Demand Responsiveness: Letting Customers Protect Themselves , 2003 .

[8]  Standard Ashrae Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy , 1992 .

[9]  G. Newsham,et al.  Effect of dimming control on office worker satisfaction and performance , 2004 .

[10]  Anca D. Galasiu,et al.  Energy Saving Lighting Control Systems for Open-Plan Offices: A Field Study , 2007 .

[11]  Tomoaki Shikakura,et al.  Perception of Lighting Fluctuation in Office Lighting Environment , 2003 .

[12]  Guy R. Newsham,et al.  The Potential for Demand-Responsive Lighting in Non-daylit Offices , 2006 .

[13]  Y Akashi,et al.  Potential recommendations for illuminance reductions by load-shedding , 2005 .

[14]  Sila Kiliccote,et al.  Demand Responsive Lighting: A Scoping Study , 2007 .

[15]  Roger G. Marchand,et al.  Control strategies for lighting and ventilation in offices: effects on energy and occupants , 2009 .

[16]  Yukio Akashi,et al.  Detectability and Acceptability of Illuminance Reduction for Load Shedding , 2004 .

[17]  Krzysztof Kryszczuk,et al.  Detection of Slow Light Level Reduction , 2002 .

[18]  新 雅夫,et al.  ASHRAE(American Society of Heating,Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers)大会"国際年"行事に参加して , 1975 .

[19]  Roger G. Marchand,et al.  Detection and Acceptance of Demand-Responsive Lighting in Offices with and without Daylight , 2008 .

[20]  B. J. Kirby,et al.  Spinning Reserve From Responsive Loads , 2003 .