Good publication practice for pharmaceutical companies

SUMMARY Guidelines on Good Publication Practice (GPP) for pharmaceutical companies are presented. The aim of the guidelines is to ensure that clinical trials sponsored by pharmaceutical companies are published in a responsible and ethical manner. The guidelines cover companies' responsibility to endeavour to publish results of all studies, companies' relations with investigators, measures to prevent redundant or premature publication, methods to improve trial identification and the role of professional medical writers. Our aim in publishing the GPP guidelines, which are the first to be developed by and for those working on publications in the pharmaceutical industry, is to stimulate discussion between journals, investigators and trial sponsors and to provide guidance to those who seek it. We also hope that pharmaceutical companies and others involved in developing publications arising from sponsored clinical trials will endorse the guidelines.

[1]  Kenneth F. Schulz,et al.  The CONSORT Statement , 1996 .

[2]  P. Easterbrook,et al.  Publication bias in clinical research , 1991, The Lancet.

[3]  C. R. Reed,et al.  Recent trends and controversies in industry-sponsored clinical trials. , 1999, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[4]  Rennie Improving the conduct and reporting of clinical trials , 2000, JAMA.

[5]  Aids to navigation , 2000, The Lancet.

[6]  C M Kunin Clinical investigators and the pharmaceutical industry. , 1978, Annals of internal medicine.

[7]  Lois Ann Colaianni,et al.  UNIFORM REQUIREMENTS FOR MANUSCRIPTS SUBMITTED TO BIOMEDICAL JOURNALS , 2000 .

[8]  E Wager Redefining authorship , 1996, BMJ.

[9]  F. Davidoff News from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors , 2000, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[10]  K. Dickersin The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. , 1990, JAMA.

[11]  T. Bodenheimer,et al.  Uneasy alliance--clinical investigators and the pharmaceutical industry. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  I. Olkin,et al.  Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. , 1996, JAMA.

[13]  Melissa S. Anderson,et al.  Withholding research results in academic life science. Evidence from a national survey of faculty. , 1997, JAMA.

[14]  R. Simes,et al.  Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects , 1997, BMJ.

[15]  D. Rennie,et al.  The contributions of authors. , 2000, JAMA.

[16]  Gerd Antes,et al.  Under-reporting of clinical trials is unethical , 2003, The Lancet.

[17]  B. Gandevia,et al.  DECLARATION OF HELSINKI. , 1964, The Medical journal of Australia.