Visual similarity in masking and priming: The critical role of task relevance

Cognitive scientists use rapid image sequences to study both the emergence of conscious perception (visual masking) and the unconscious processes involved in response preparation (masked priming). The present study asked two questions: (1) Does image similarity influence masking and priming in the same way? (2) Are similarity effects in both tasks governed by the extent of feature overlap in the images or only by task-relevant features? Participants in Experiment 1 classified human faces using a single dimension even though the faces varied in three dimensions (emotion, race, sex). Abstract geometric shapes and colors were tested in the same way in Experiment 2. Results showed that similarity reduced the visibility of the target in the masking task and increased response speed in the priming task, pointing to a double-dissociation between the two tasks. Results also showed that only task-relevant (not objective) similarity influenced masking and priming, implying that both tasks are influenced from the beginning by intentions of the participant. These findings are interpreted within the framework of a reentrant theory of visual perception. They imply that intentions can influence object formation prior to the separation of vision for perception and vision for action.

[1]  T. Schmidt.  The Finger in Flight: Real-Time Motor Control by Visually Masked Color Stimuli , 2002, Psychological science.

[2]  Arnulf Remole,et al.  VISUAL MASKING: AN INTEGRATIVE APPROACH , 1985 .

[3]  O. Neumann,et al.  Motor activation without conscious discrimination in metacontrast masking. , 1999 .

[4]  M. Potter,et al.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  D. Raab,et al.  Reaction time to stimuli masked by metacontrast. , 1962, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  J. Enns,et al.  Negative compatibility or object updating? A cautionary tale of mask-dependent priming. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  James T. Enns,et al.  Change Detection: Paying Attention To Detail , 2000 .

[8]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[9]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Consequences of display changes during interrupted visual search: Rapid resumption is target specific , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  J. Theeuwes.  Perceptual selectivity for color and form , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  J. Enns,et al.  On-line control of pointing is modified by unseen visual shapes , 2007, Consciousness and Cognition.

[12]  O. Neumann,et al.  Intentions determine the effect of invisible metacontrast-masked primes: evidence for top-down contingencies in a peripheral cuing task. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  Jian Chen,et al.  Unconscious and conscious priming by forms and their parts , 2005 .

[14]  E Scheerer,et al.  Integration, interruption and processing rate in visual backward masking , 1973, Psychologische Forschung.

[15]  J. Enns,et al.  Object Updating and the Flash-Lag Effect , 2004, Psychological science.

[16]  P. McCormick.  Orienting attention without awareness. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Rapid Resumption of Interrupted Visual Search , 2005, Psychological science.

[18]  A. Young,et al.  Repetition priming of face recognition , 1987, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[19]  Thomas Schmidt,et al.  Invariant time-course of priming with and without awareness , 2004 .

[20]  James T Enns,et al.  Change detection in an attended face depends on the expectation of the observer. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[21]  James T. Enns,et al.  Updating a Cautionary Tale of Masked Priming: Reply to Klapp (2005). , 2005 .

[22]  O. Neumann.  Direct parameter specification and the concept of perception , 1990, Psychological research.

[23]  U. Castiello.  Grasping a fruit: selection for action. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  James T. Enns,et al.  Task switching mediates the attentional blink even without backward masking , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  J. Enns,et al.  Object Substitution: A New Form of Masking in Unattended Visual Locations , 1997 .

[26]  M. Turvey.  On peripheral and central processes in vision: inferences from an information-processing analysis of masking with patterned stimuli. , 1973, Psychological review.

[27]  J. Jonides.  Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement , 1981 .

[28]  Kent C. Berridge,et al.  Unconscious Affective Reactions to Masked Happy Versus Angry Faces Influence Consumption Behavior and Judgments of Value , 2005, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[29]  Rolf Verleger,et al.  Qualitative differences between conscious and nonconscious processing? On inverse priming induced by masked arrows. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[30]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Psychophysical magic: rendering the visible ‘invisible’ , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  Ulrich Ansorge,et al.  Top–Down Contingencies of Nonconscious Priming Revealed by Dual–Task Interference , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[32]  Romeo Chua,et al.  What the hand can’t tell the eye: illusion of space constancy during accurate pointing , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[33]  J. Schwarzbach,et al.  Different time courses for visual perception and action priming , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? . , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  R. Verleger,et al.  How the Self Controls Its Automatic Pilot when Processing Subliminal Information , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  E. Schröger,et al.  Psychophysics beyond sensation : laws and invariants of human cognition , 2004 .

[37]  J. Enns,et al.  What’s new in visual masking? , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[39]  Haluk Ogmen,et al.  Unconscious priming by color and form: Different processes and levels , 2004, Consciousness and Cognition.

[40]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[41]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Active masks and active inhibition: a comment on Lleras and Enns (2004) and on Verleger, Jaskowski, Aydemir, van der Lubbe, and Groen (2004). , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[42]  J. Enns,et al.  The attentional blink: Resource depletion or temporary loss of control? , 2005, Psychological research.

[43]  G. Logan,et al.  Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention , 1996 .

[44]  J. Enns.  Object substitution and its relation to other forms of visual masking , 2004, Vision Research.

[45]  Alejandro Lleras,et al.  How much like a target can a mask be? Geometric, spatial, and temporal similarity in priming: a reply to Schlaghecken and Eimer (2006). , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[46]  T Bachmann,et al.  Integration and Interruption in the Masking of Form by Form , 1976, Perception.

[47]  Richard M Shiffrin,et al.  Confusion and compensation in visual perception: effects of spatiotemporal proximity and selective attention. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[48]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Motor activation with and without inhibition: Evidence for a threshold mechanism in motor control , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[50]  S. Hochstein,et al.  View from the Top Hierarchies and Reverse Hierarchies in the Visual System , 2002, Neuron.

[51]  R. Leal-Arcas,et al.  Contents: summary of , 2016 .

[52]  S. T. Klapp,et al.  The negative compatibility effect: unconscious inhibition influences reaction time and response selection. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[53]  M. Goodale,et al.  Visual control of action but not perception requires analytical processing of object shape , 2003, Nature.

[54]  R M Shiffrin,et al.  Perception and preference in short-term word priming. , 2001, Psychological review.

[55]  J. Enns,et al.  Space and Time in Perception and Action: Object updating: a force for perceptual continuity and scene stability in human vision , 2010 .

[56]  Vincent Di Lollo,et al.  Temporal integration in visual memory. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[57]  Christian Keysers,et al.  Visual masking and RSVP reveal neural competition , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[58]  D. Carey,et al.  Do action systems resist visual illusions? , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[59]  C. Prablanc,et al.  Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement , 1986, Nature.

[60]  Ulrich Ansorge,et al.  Direct parameter specification of an attention shift: evidence from perceptual latency priming , 2003, Vision Research.

[61]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  Blinded by headlights. , 2002, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.