Single-letter cue selection and degree of paired-associate learning in retardates.

[1]  A. Baumeister,et al.  Cue Selection Methodology in Paired-Associate Learning. , 1971, The Journal of general psychology.

[2]  A. Baumeister,et al.  Single-letter cue selection in the paired-associate learning of normal children and retardates. , 1970, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[3]  A. Baumeister,et al.  Effects of secondary cues on rote verbal learning of retardates and normal children. , 1969, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[4]  G. Kellas,et al.  Response learning and the paired-associate performance of mental retardates. , 1969, American journal of mental deficiency.

[5]  W. L. Davis,et al.  Cue selection as a function of degree of learning and response similarity. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  C. T. James,et al.  Stimulus selection at different stages of paired-associate learning. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  J. Houston.  Stimulus selection as influenced by degrees of learning, attention, prior associations, and experience with the stimulus components. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  F. Rabinowitz,et al.  Stimulus selection as a function of letter color , 1967 .

[9]  I. Birnbaum.  Context stimuli in verbal learning and the persistence of associative factors. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  A. Baumeister,et al.  Cue selection and meaningfulness in the paired-associates learning of retardates. , 1971, American journal of mental deficiency.

[11]  Allen L. Harrington.  Effects of component emphasis on stimulus selection in paired-associate learning. , 1969 .

[12]  L. Postman,et al.  Conditions of cue selection in the acquisition of paired-associate lists. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.