Coarse-grained biomolecular simulation with REACH: realistic extension algorithm via covariance Hessian.

Coarse-graining of protein interactions provides a means of simulating large biological systems. Here, a coarse-graining method, REACH, is introduced, in which the force constants of a residue-scale elastic network model are calculated from the variance-covariance matrix obtained from atomistic molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. In test calculations, the C(alpha)-atoms variance-covariance matrices are calculated from the ensembles of 1-ns atomistic MD trajectories in monomeric and dimeric myoglobin, and used to derive coarse-grained force constants for the local and nonbonded interactions. Construction of analytical model functions of the distance-dependence of the interresidue force constants allows rapid calculation of the REACH normal modes. The model force constants from monomeric and dimeric myoglobin are found to be similar in magnitude to each other. The MD intra- and intermolecular mean-square fluctuations and the vibrational density of states are well reproduced by the residue-scale REACH normal modes without requiring rescaling of the force constant parameters. The temperature-dependence of the myoglobin REACH force constants reveals that the dynamical transition in protein internal fluctuations arises principally from softening of the elasticity in the nonlocal interactions. The REACH method is found to be a reliable way of determining spatiotemporal protein motion without the need for expensive computations of long atomistic MD simulations.

[1]  F. Parak,et al.  Untersuchung des Schwingungsanteils und des Kristallgitterfehleranteils des Temperaturfaktors in Myoglobin durch Vergleich von Mössbauer-absorptionsmessungen mit Röntgenstrukturdaten , 1971 .

[2]  M. Karplus,et al.  Method for estimating the configurational entropy of macromolecules , 1981 .

[3]  M. Karplus,et al.  Harmonic dynamics of proteins: normal modes and fluctuations in bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[5]  N. Go,et al.  Dynamics of a small globular protein in terms of low-frequency vibrational modes. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  M. Karplus,et al.  CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations , 1983 .

[7]  M. Karplus,et al.  Normal modes for specific motions of macromolecules: application to the hinge-bending mode of lysozyme. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  M. Levitt,et al.  Protein normal-mode dynamics: trypsin inhibitor, crambin, ribonuclease and lysozyme. , 1985, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  I. M. Klotz,et al.  Ligand–receptor interactions: facts and fantasies , 1985, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[10]  H. Frauenfelder,et al.  Conformational substates in proteins. , 1988, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[11]  S. Benkovic,et al.  Insights into enzyme function from studies on mutants of dihydrofolate reductase. , 1988, Science.

[12]  Frauenfelder,et al.  Glassy behavior of a protein. , 1989, Physical review letters.

[13]  Wolfgang Doster,et al.  Dynamical transition of myoglobin revealed by inelastic neutron scattering , 1989, Nature.

[14]  M Karplus,et al.  Dynamics of myoglobin: comparison of simulation results with neutron scattering spectra. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  N Go,et al.  Deoxymyoglobin studied by the conformational normal mode analysis. I. Dynamics of globin and the heme-globin interaction. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  N Go,et al.  Normal mode analysis of human lysozyme: Study of the relative motion of the two domains and characterization of the harmonic motion , 1991, Proteins.

[17]  P. Wolynes,et al.  The energy landscapes and motions of proteins. , 1991, Science.

[18]  M. Sutcliffe,et al.  Protein-ligand interactions: exchange processes and determination of ligand conformation and protein-ligand contacts. , 1994, Methods in enzymology.

[19]  David Pérahia,et al.  Computation of Low-frequency Normal Modes in Macromolecules: Improvements to the Method of Diagonalization in a Mixed Basis and Application to Hemoglobin , 1995, Comput. Chem..

[20]  D Perahia,et al.  Motions in hemoglobin studied by normal mode analysis and energy minimization: evidence for the existence of tertiary T-like, quaternary R-like intermediate structures. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  Tirion,et al.  Large Amplitude Elastic Motions in Proteins from a Single-Parameter, Atomic Analysis. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[22]  M L Lamb,et al.  Computational approaches to molecular recognition. , 1997, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[23]  I. Bahar,et al.  Gaussian Dynamics of Folded Proteins , 1997 .

[24]  A. Atilgan,et al.  Direct evaluation of thermal fluctuations in proteins using a single-parameter harmonic potential. , 1997, Folding & design.

[25]  K. Hinsen Analysis of domain motions by approximate normal mode calculations , 1998, Proteins.

[26]  A. Atilgan,et al.  Vibrational Dynamics of Folded Proteins: Significance of Slow and Fast Motions in Relation to Function and Stability , 1998 .

[27]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. , 1998, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[28]  I. Bahar,et al.  Structure‐based analysis of protein dynamics: Comparison of theoretical results for hen lysozyme with X‐ray diffraction and NMR relaxation data , 1999, Proteins.

[29]  J Berendzen,et al.  Crystal structures of myoglobin-ligand complexes at near-atomic resolution. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[30]  S. Hayward,et al.  Structural principles governing domain motions in proteins , 1999, Proteins.

[31]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[32]  G. Zaccai,et al.  How soft is a protein? A protein dynamics force constant measured by neutron scattering. , 2000, Science.

[33]  Y. Sanejouand,et al.  Conformational change of proteins arising from normal mode calculations. , 2001, Protein engineering.

[34]  P. Kollman,et al.  Biomolecular simulations: recent developments in force fields, simulations of enzyme catalysis, protein-ligand, protein-protein, and protein-nucleic acid noncovalent interactions. , 2001, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[35]  M. Delarue,et al.  Simplified normal mode analysis of conformational transitions in DNA-dependent polymerases: the elastic network model. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[36]  Jeremy C. Smith,et al.  Temperature dependence of protein dynamics: computer simulation analysis of neutron scattering properties. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[37]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C , 2002 .

[38]  Jeremy C. Smith,et al.  Translational hydration water dynamics drives the protein glass transition. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[39]  Jeremy C. Smith,et al.  Principal components of the protein dynamical transition. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[40]  Robert L Jernigan,et al.  Molecular mechanism of domain swapping in proteins: an analysis of slower motions. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[41]  C. Brooks,et al.  Diversity and identity of mechanical properties of icosahedral viral capsids studied with elastic network normal mode analysis. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[42]  I. Bahar,et al.  Structural changes involved in protein binding correlate with intrinsic motions of proteins in the unbound state. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  Hassan A. Karimi,et al.  iGNM: a database of protein functional motions based on Gaussian Network Model , 2005, Bioinform..

[44]  I. Bahar,et al.  Coarse-grained normal mode analysis in structural biology. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.

[45]  Joanna Trylska,et al.  Exploring global motions and correlations in the ribosome. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[46]  Jeremy C. Smith,et al.  Correlated dynamics determining x-ray diffuse scattering from a crystalline protein revealed by molecular dynamics simulation. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[47]  M. Wall,et al.  Allostery in a coarse-grained model of protein dynamics. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[48]  B. Brooks,et al.  Probing the local dynamics of nucleotide-binding pocket coupled to the global dynamics: myosin versus kinesin. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[49]  Jeremy C. Smith,et al.  Langevin model of the temperature and hydration dependence of protein vibrational dynamics. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[50]  Rafael Brüschweiler,et al.  Reorientational contact-weighted elastic network model for the prediction of protein dynamics: comparison with NMR relaxation. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[51]  Oliver F. Lange,et al.  Can principal components yield a dimension reduced description of protein dynamics on long time scales? , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[52]  Gregory A Voth,et al.  Modeling real dynamics in the coarse-grained representation of condensed phase systems. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[53]  Gregory A Voth,et al.  Coarse-grained modeling of the actin filament derived from atomistic-scale simulations. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[54]  Jeremy C Smith,et al.  Temperature-dependent protein dynamics: a simulation-based probabilistic diffusion-vibration Langevin description. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[55]  Guang Song,et al.  An enhanced elastic network model to represent the motions of domain‐swapped proteins , 2006, Proteins.

[56]  Gregory A Voth,et al.  Coarse-grained peptide modeling using a systematic multiscale approach. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[57]  Jeremy C. Smith,et al.  Protein dynamics from X‐ray crystallography: Anisotropic, global motion in diffuse scattering patterns , 2006, Proteins.