Multi-modality CADx: ROC study of the effect on radiologists' accuracy in characterizing breast masses on mammograms and 3D ultrasound images.

[1]  Michael R Hamblin,et al.  CA : A Cancer Journal for Clinicians , 2011 .

[2]  Luisa P. Wallace,et al.  The "laboratory" effect: comparing radiologists' performance and variability during prospective clinical and laboratory mammography interpretations. , 2008, Radiology.

[3]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  Classifier performance prediction for computer-aided diagnosis using a limited dataset. , 2008, Medical physics.

[4]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  Characterization of mammographic masses based on level set segmentation with new image features and patient information. , 2007, Medical physics.

[5]  Pasquale Delogu,et al.  Characterization of mammographic masses using a gradient-based segmentation algorithm and a neural classifier , 2007, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[6]  J. Baker,et al.  Breast mass lesions: computer-aided diagnosis models with mammographic and sonographic descriptors. , 2007, Radiology.

[7]  Ruey-Feng Chang,et al.  Breast ultrasound computer-aided diagnosis using BI-RADS features. , 2007, Academic radiology.

[8]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  Malignant and benign breast masses on 3D US volumetric images: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologist accuracy. , 2007, Radiology.

[9]  D. Vanel.  The American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging and Reporting Data System (BI-RADS): a step towards a universal radiological language? , 2007, European journal of radiology.

[10]  David Gur,et al.  The prevalence effect in a laboratory environment: Changing the confidence ratings. , 2007, Academic radiology.

[11]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2007 , 2007, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[12]  Li Lan,et al.  Classification of breast lesions with multimodality computer-aided diagnosis: observer study results on an independent clinical data set. , 2006, Radiology.

[13]  Heng-Da Cheng,et al.  Approaches for automated detection and classification of masses in mammograms , 2006, Pattern Recognit..

[14]  N Karssemeijer,et al.  Use of border information in the classification of mammographic masses , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  M. Giger,et al.  Multimodality computerized diagnosis of breast lesions using mammography and sonography. , 2005, Academic radiology.

[16]  David Gur,et al.  Trends in recall, biopsy, and positive biopsy rates for screening mammography in an academic practice. , 2005, Radiology.

[17]  Hee Chan Kim,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis of solid breast nodules: use of an artificial neural network based on multiple sonographic features , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  Susan M. Schultz,et al.  Computer‐Based Margin Analysis of Breast Sonography for Differentiating Malignant and Benign Masses , 2004, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[19]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  Computerized characterization of breast masses on three-dimensional ultrasound volumes. , 2004, Medical physics.

[20]  Maryellen L Giger,et al.  Performance of computer-aided diagnosis in the interpretation of lesions on breast sonography. , 2004, Academic radiology.

[21]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2003, Technometrics.

[22]  David Gur,et al.  Prevalence effect in a laboratory environment. , 2003, Radiology.

[23]  Loren W Nolte,et al.  Application of likelihood ratio to classification of mammographic masses; performance comparison to case-based reasoning. , 2003, Medical physics.

[24]  K. Han,et al.  Breast lesions on sonograms: computer-aided diagnosis with nearly setting-independent features and artificial neural networks. , 2003, Radiology.

[25]  P M Shankar,et al.  Computer aided classification of masses in ultrasonic mammography. , 2002, Medical physics.

[26]  M. Giger,et al.  Breast cancer: effectiveness of computer-aided diagnosis observer study with independent database of mammograms. , 2002, Radiology.

[27]  C. Floyd,et al.  Differences between computer-aided diagnosis of breast masses and that of calcifications. , 2002, Radiology.

[28]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Computer-aided characterization of mammographic masses: accuracy of mass segmentation and its effects on characterization , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[29]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  Analysis of temporal changes of mammographic features: computer-aided classification of malignant and benign breast masses. , 2001, Medical physics.

[30]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  Improvement of mammographic mass characterization using spiculation meausures and morphological features. , 2001, Medical physics.

[31]  G L LeCarpentier,et al.  Discrimination of sonographically detected breast masses using frequency shift color Doppler imaging in combination with age and gray scale criteria. , 2001, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[32]  M L Giger,et al.  Computerized classification of benign and malignant masses on digitized mammograms: a study of robustness. , 2000, Academic radiology.

[33]  Rangaraj M. Rangayyan,et al.  Gradient and texture analysis for the classification of mammographic masses , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[34]  S. Fields,et al.  Improved mammographic interpretation of masses using computer-aided diagnosis , 2000, European Radiology.

[35]  D. Chen,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis applied to US of solid breast nodules by using neural networks. , 1999, Radiology.

[36]  N. Petrick,et al.  Improvement of radiologists' characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study. , 1999, Radiology.

[37]  J. Eisenberg.  Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. , 1999, Medical care.

[38]  N. Petrick,et al.  Computerized characterization of masses on mammograms: the rubber band straightening transform and texture analysis. , 1998, Medical physics.

[39]  A R Feinstein,et al.  Context bias. A problem in diagnostic radiology. , 1996, JAMA.

[40]  C. Metz,et al.  A receiver operating characteristic partial area index for highly sensitive diagnostic tests. , 1996, Radiology.

[41]  E A Sickles,et al.  Screening mammography in community practice: positive predictive value of abnormal findings and yield of follow-up diagnostic procedures. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[42]  Jo M. Kendrick,et al.  Quality Determinants of Mammography, Clinical Practice Guideline , 1995 .

[43]  E. Sickles.  Nonpalpable, circumscribed, noncalcified solid breast masses: likelihood of malignancy based on lesion size and age of patient. , 1994, Radiology.

[44]  Marydale Debor,et al.  Quality determinants of mammography , 1993 .

[45]  Dd Dorfman,et al.  ROC rating analysis : generalization to the population of readers and cases with the jackknife method , 1992 .

[46]  K. Berbaum,et al.  Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. , 1992, Investigative radiology.

[47]  C. Metz.  ROC Methodology in Radiologic Imaging , 1986, Investigative radiology.

[48]  J. Hanley,et al.  Statistical Approaches to the Analysis of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curves , 1984, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.