Crowd-Sourced Peer Feedback (CPF) for Learning Community Engagement: Results and Reflections from a Pilot Study

The goal of this study is to develop a new approach to collaborative peer feedback enabled by social media, understand how it is perceived by university students, and develop insights regarding its impacts on learning. We adapted a crowd sourcing platform that enabled students to submit their own assignments, and enabled students and outside experts to assess the quality of assignments using voting and commenting. We call this approach "crowd-sourced peer feedback" (CPF). Results of our pilot study suggest that viewing and commenting on other assignments increases engagement, mobilizes motivation, and may enhance learning. In contrast, mixed results were found for voting and the use of badges and points. Finally, minor design choices in how the CPF platform is implemented may have significant impacts on learning experiences. We provide suggestions for future research and for the use of CPF to enhance learning.

[1]  Nor Ashikin Ab Manan,et al.  Guided Peer Feedback on Academic Writing Tasks using Facebook Notes: An Exploratory Study☆ , 2012 .

[2]  Brian Thoms,et al.  A Dynamic Social Feedback System to Support Learning and Social Interaction in Higher Education , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[3]  Ismail Sahin,et al.  Considering Students' Perceptions: The Distance Education Student Satisfaction Model , 2008, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[4]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research , 2008 .

[5]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[6]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Leveraging crowdsourcing – activationsupporting components for IT-based idea competitions , 2009 .

[7]  Simone Krüger.  Students' Experiences of e-learning: a Virtual Ethnography into Blended Online Learning , 2006 .

[8]  Barbara Means,et al.  Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies , 2009 .

[9]  Michael Vitale,et al.  The Wisdom of Crowds , 2015, Cell.

[10]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Incentives and Problem Uncertainty in Innovation Contests: An Empirical Analysis , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[11]  Eric Zhi-Feng Liu,et al.  Web-based peer assessment: feedback for students with various thinking-styles , 2001, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[12]  B. McCombs,et al.  A Learner-Centered Framework for E-Learning , 2005, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[13]  Julie G. Nyquist,et al.  How Learning Works: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching , 2012 .

[14]  P. Robert-Jan Simons,et al.  The nature, reception, and use of online peer feedback in higher education , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[15]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  University Students’ Perceptions of and Attitudes Toward (Online) Peer Assessment , 2006 .

[16]  Yun Xiao,et al.  The impact of two types of peer assessment on students' performance and satisfaction within a Wiki environment , 2008, Internet High. Educ..

[17]  Dowming Yeh,et al.  What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[18]  A. Bandura.  Social learning theory , 1977 .

[19]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  Conceptions of and approaches to learning through online peer assessment , 2010 .

[20]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  Using Peer Feedback to Enhance the Quality of Student Online Postings: An Exploratory Study , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[21]  R LakhaniKarim,et al.  Incentives and Problem Uncertainty in Innovation Contests , 2011 .

[22]  David G. Myers,et al.  Discussion effects on militarism-pacifism: A test of the group polarization hypothesis. , 1974 .

[23]  Raafat George Saadé,et al.  The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: an extension of the technology acceptance model , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[24]  Marsha C. Lovett,et al.  How learning works , 2010 .

[25]  Lina Lee.  Fostering reflective writing and interactive exchange through blogging in an advanced language course , 2010, ReCALL.

[26]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  Leveraging Crowdsourcing: Activation-Supporting Components for IT-Based Ideas Competition , 2009, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Nigel P. Melville,et al.  Systematic Service Innovation in Organizations: EDCI--A Template for Human-Centered Design of E-Services , 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[28]  D. Myers,et al.  The polarizing effect of group discussion. , 1975, American scientist.

[29]  Terry Anderson,et al.  The Theory and Practice of Online Learning , 2009 .

[30]  L. Festinger.  A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .