The role of reinforcement in speciation: Theory and data
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] W. Rice. Speciation via habitat specialization: the evolution of reproductive isolation as a correlated character , 1987, Evolutionary Ecology.
[2] M. Noor,et al. Recombination and the Divergence of Hybridizing Species , 2002, Genetica.
[3] James Mallet,et al. Causes and Consequences of a Lack of Coevolution in Müllerian mimicry , 1999, Evolutionary Ecology.
[4] H. Naveira,et al. A three-locus system of interspecific incompatibility underlies male inviability in hybrids between Drosophila buzzatii and D. koepferae , 1996, Genetica.
[5] M. Hołyńska. Is the spinule pattern on the leg 4 coxopodite a tactile signal in the specific mate recognition system of Mesocyclops (Copepoda, Cyclopidae)? , 2004, Hydrobiologia.
[6] B. Crespi,et al. Reproductive isolation driven by the combined effects of ecological adaptation and reinforcement , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[7] M. Servedio,et al. Speciation as a positive feedback loop between postzygotic and prezygotic barriers to gene flow , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[8] G. Höbel,et al. REPRODUCTIVE CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT IN THE ACOUSTIC COMMUNICATION SYSTEM OF GREEN TREE FROGS (HYLA CINEREA) , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[9] N. Barton,et al. ACCUMULATING POSTZYGOTIC ISOLATION GENES IN PARAPATRY: A NEW TWIST ON CHROMOSOMAL SPECIATION , 2003, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[10] A. Syvänen,et al. Sex chromosome evolution and speciation in Ficedula flycatchers , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[11] S. Gabriel,et al. Paternal inheritance of a female moth's mating preference , 2002, Nature.
[12] T. Price,et al. THE EVOLUTION OF F1 POSTZYGOTIC INCOMPATIBILITIES IN BIRDS , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[13] R. Burton,et al. Functional coadaptation between cytochrome c and cytochrome c oxidase within allopatric populations of a marine copepod , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[14] K. Pfennig,et al. DIFFERENTIAL SELECTION TO AVOID HYBRIDIZATION IN TWO TOAD SPECIES , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[15] D. Levitan. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CONSPECIFIC FERTILIZATION SUCCESS AND REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION AMONG THREE CONGENERIC SEA URCHINS , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[16] D. Presgraves,et al. PATTERNS OF POSTZYGOTIC ISOLATION IN LEPIDOPTERA , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[17] H. Slabbekoorn,et al. Bird song, ecology and speciation. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[18] Mark Kirkpatrick,et al. Speciation by Natural and Sexual Selection: Models and Experiments , 2002, The American Naturalist.
[19] Manfred Gahr,et al. The honesty of bird song: multiple constraints for multiple traits , 2002 .
[20] S. Via,et al. The Genetic Architecture of Ecological Specialization: Correlated Gene Effects on Host Use and Habitat Choice in Pea Aphids , 2002, The American Naturalist.
[21] W. Swanson,et al. The rapid evolution of reproductive proteins , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.
[22] H. Rundle. A TEST OF ECOLOGICALLY DEPENDENT POSTMATING ISOLATION BETWEEN SYMPATRIC STICKLEBACKS , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[23] J. Jokela,et al. Reproductive character displacement between the closely related freshwater snails Lymnaea peregra and L. ovata , 2002 .
[24] J. Feder,et al. Sympatric speciation in phytophagous insects: moving beyond controversy? , 2002, Annual review of entomology.
[25] M. Noor,et al. Chromosomal inversions and the reproductive isolation of species , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[26] M. Servedio,et al. BEYOND REINFORCEMENT: THE EVOLUTION OF PREMATING ISOLATION BY DIRECT SELECTION ON PREFERENCES AND POSTMATING, PREZYGOTIC INCOMPATIBILITIES , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[27] J. Willis,et al. EVIDENCE FOR DOBZHANSKY‐MULLER INCOMPATIBILITES CONTRIBUTING TO THE STERILITY OF HYBRIDS BETWEEN MIMULUS GUTTATUS AND M. NASUTUS , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[28] J. Mallet,et al. Disruptive sexual selection against hybrids contributes to speciation between Heliconius cydno and Heliconius melpomene , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[29] R. Burton,et al. VIABILITY OF CYTOCHROME C GENOTYPES DEPENDS ON CYTOPLASMIC BACKGROUNDS IN TIGRIOPUS CALIFORNICUS , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[30] H. A. Orr,et al. Complex epistasis and the genetic basis of hybrid sterility in the Drosophila pseudoobscura Bogota-USA hybridization. , 2001, Genetics.
[31] D. Schluter. Ecology and the origin of species. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[32] N. Barton,et al. Theory and speciation. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[33] M. Kirkpatrick. Reinforcement during ecological speciation , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[34] Chung-I Wu,et al. Incipient speciation by sexual isolation in Drosophila: Concurrent evolution at multiple loci , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[35] M. Matsuda,et al. A locus for female discrimination behavior causing sexual isolation in Drosophila , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[36] James Mallet,et al. Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry , 2001, Nature.
[37] A. Helbig,et al. Male‐biased gene flow across an avian hybrid zone: evidence from mitochondrial and microsatellite DNA , 2001 .
[38] M. Noor,et al. THE GENETICS OF REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION AND THE POTENTIAL FOR GENE EXCHANGE BETWEEN DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA AND D. PERSIMILIS VIA BACKCROSS HYBRID MALES , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[39] M. Noor,et al. Courtship songs of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. II. Genetics of species differences , 2001, Heredity.
[40] J. Podos. Correlated evolution of morphology and vocal signal structure in Darwin's finches , 2001, Nature.
[41] H. Rundle,et al. A GENETIC INTERPRETATION OF ECOLOGICALLY DEPENDENT ISOLATION , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[42] M. Kirkpatrick. Reinforcement and divergence under assortative mating , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[43] B. Drossel,et al. Competitive speciation in quantitative genetic models. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.
[44] H. A. Orr,et al. Dominance, epistasis and the genetics of postzygotic isolation. , 2000, Genetics.
[45] J. Werren,et al. INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION IN SEXUAL ISOLATION IN THE JEWEL WASP NASONIA , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[46] M. Servedio. REINFORCEMENT AND THE GENETICS OF NONRANDOM MATING , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[47] Jin Yoshimura,et al. Speciation by sexual selection in hybridizing populations without viability selection , 2000 .
[48] M. Higashi,et al. Sympatric speciation by sexual selection , 1999, Nature.
[49] R. Wyatt,et al. POLLINATOR‐MEDIATED COMPETITION, REPRODUCTIVE CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT, AND THE EVOLUTION OF SELFING IN ARENARIA UNIFLORA (CARYOPHYLLACEAE) , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[50] D. J. Howard. Conspecific Sperm and Pollen Precedence and Speciation , 1999 .
[51] M. Noor. Reinforcement and other consequences of sympatry2 , 1999, Heredity.
[52] M. Cain,et al. REINFORCING SELECTION IS EFFECTIVE UNDER A RELATIVELY BROAD SET OF CONDITIONS IN A MOSAIC HYBRID ZONE , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[53] Fyodor A. Kondrashov,et al. Interactions among quantitative traits in the course of sympatric speciation , 1999, Nature.
[54] U. Dieckmann,et al. On the origin of species by sympatric speciation , 1999, Nature.
[55] Dolph Schluter,et al. SEXUAL SELECTION AGAINST HYBRIDS BETWEEN SYMPATRIC STICKLEBACK SPECIES: EVIDENCE FROM A FIELD EXPERIMENT , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[56] D. Schluter,et al. ECOLOGICAL SPECIATION IN STICKLEBACKS: ENVIRONMENT‐DEPENDENT HYBRID FITNESS , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[57] D. Irwin,et al. Sexual imprinting, learning and speciation , 1999, Heredity.
[58] M Kirkpatrick,et al. The reinforcement of mating preferences on an island. , 1999, Genetics.
[59] K. Kral,et al. Dynamics of a clinal hybrid zone and a comparison with island hybrid zones of flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca and F. albicollis) , 1999 .
[60] M. Noor. Reinforcement and other consequences of sympatry. , 1999, Heredity.
[61] A. Kondrashov,et al. On the origin of species by means of assortative mating , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[62] Daniel J. Howard,et al. Endless Forms: Species and Speciation , 1998 .
[63] M. Sasa,et al. PATTERNS OF POSTZYGOTIC ISOLATION IN FROGS , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[64] P. Hogeweg,et al. Sympatric speciation and extinction driven by environment dependent sexual selection , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[65] T. Sota,et al. GENITAL LOCK‐AND‐KEY AS A SELECTIVE AGENT AGAINST HYBRIDIZATION , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[66] H. A. Orr,et al. The evolutionary genetics of speciation. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[67] Dolph Schluter,et al. BODY SIZE, NATURAL SELECTION, AND SPECIATION IN STICKLEBACKS , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[68] H. Rundle,et al. REINFORCEMENT OF STICKLEBACK MATE PREFERENCES: SYMPATRY BREEDS CONTEMPT , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[69] T. Kawecki. SYMPATRIC SPECIATION VIA HABITAT SPECIALIZATION DRIVEN BY DELETERIOUS MUTATIONS , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[70] P. Michalak,et al. TESTS FOR SEXUAL INCOMPATIBILITY BETWEEN TWO NEWT SPECIES, TRITURUS VULGARIS AND TRITURUS MONTANDONI: NO‐CHOICE MATING DESIGN , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[71] M. Kirkpatrick,et al. THE EFFECTS OF GENE FLOW ON REINFORCEMENT , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[72] B. Grant,et al. Genetics and the origin of bird species. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[73] T. Markow,et al. Assortative fertilization in Drosophila. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[74] J. Mallet,et al. Speciation in two neotropical butterflies: extending Haldane's rule , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[75] Glenn-Peter Stre,et al. A sexually selected character displacement in flycatchers reinforces premating isolation , 1997, Nature.
[76] M. Noor. How Often Does Sympatry Affect Sexual Isolation in Drosophila? , 1997, The American Naturalist.
[77] M. Noor. GENETICS OF SEXUAL ISOLATION AND COURTSHIP DYSFUNCTION IN MALE HYBRIDS OF DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA AND DROSOPHILA PERSIMILIS , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[78] M. Kirkpatrick,et al. The strength of indirect selection on female mating preferences. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[79] D. Krakauer,et al. SEXUAL SELECTION, SPACE, AND SPECIATION , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[80] H. A. Orr,et al. “PATTERNS OF SPECIATION IN DROSOPHILA” REVISITED , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[81] B. Grant,et al. Hybridization, Sexual Imprinting, and Mate Choice , 1997, The American Naturalist.
[82] J. Coyne. Genetics of sexual isolation in male hybrids of Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. , 1996, Genetical research.
[83] T. Kawecki. Sympatric speciation driven by beneficial mutations , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[84] W. Searcy,et al. The reproductive success of secondary females relative to that of monogamous and primary females in Red-winged Blackbirds , 1996 .
[85] G. S. Albuquerque,et al. POSTMATING REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION BETWEEN CHRYSOPA QUADRIPUNCTATA AND CHRYSOPA SLOSSONAE: MECHANISMS AND GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[86] M. Noor,et al. Speciation by reinforcement: a model derived from studies of Drosophila. , 1996, Genetics.
[87] K. Lamnissou,et al. Incompatibilities between Y chromosome and autosomes are responsible for male hybrid sterility in crosses between Drosophila virilis and Drosophila texana , 1996, Heredity.
[88] Dave R. Vos. The role of sexual imprinting for sex recognition in zebra finches: a difference between males and females , 1995, Animal Behaviour.
[89] J Mallet,et al. A species definition for the modern synthesis. , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[90] M. Noor. Speciation driven by natural selection in Drosophila , 1995, Nature.
[91] H. A. Orr,et al. The dominance theory of Haldane's rule. , 1995, Genetics.
[92] H. A. Orr,et al. The population genetics of speciation: the evolution of hybrid incompatibilities. , 1995, Genetics.
[93] M. Schilthuizen,et al. Regular articleLife on the edge: a hybrid zone inAlbinaria hippolyti(Gastropoda: Clausiliidae) from Crete , 1995 .
[94] M. Schilthuizen,et al. Life on the edge: a hybrid zone in Albinaria hippolyti (Gastropoda: Clausiliidae) from Crete , 1995 .
[95] M. Arnold,et al. Are natural hybrids fit or unfit relative to their parents? , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[96] T. Price,et al. SPECIATION BY REINFORCEMENT OF PREMATING ISOLATION , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[97] R. Butlin,et al. Recombination suppressors and the evolution of new species , 1994, Heredity.
[98] J. Feder,et al. Host fidelity is an effective premating barrier between sympatric races of the apple maggot fly. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[99] F. Sperling. SEX-LINKED GENES AND SPECIES DIFFERENCES IN LEPIDOPTERA , 1994, The Canadian Entomologist.
[100] H. Gerhardt. Reproductive character displacement of female mate choice in the grey treefrog, Hyla chrysoscelis , 1994, Animal Behaviour.
[101] A. Baker,et al. A POPULATION MEMETICS APPROACH TO CULTURAL EVOLUTION IN CHAFFINCH SONG: DIFFERENTIATION AMONG POPULATIONS , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[102] C. Clark,et al. Population dynamics of sexual and resource competition. , 1994, Theoretical population biology.
[103] Chung-I Wu,et al. Genetics of hybrid male sterility between drosophila sibling species: a complex web of epistasis is revealed in interspecific studies. , 1994, Genetics.
[104] M. King. Species Evolution: The Role of Chromosome Change , 1993 .
[105] Andrew W. Davis. Evolution of Postmating Reproductive Isolation: The Composite Nature of Haldane's Rule and Its Genetic Bases , 1993, The American Naturalist.
[106] P. Sniegowski,et al. The fertility effects of pericentric inversions in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1993, Genetics.
[107] E. Zouros,et al. An autosomal factor from Drosophila arizonae restores normal spermatogenesis in Drosophila mojavensis males carrying the D. arizonae Y chromosome. , 1993, Genetics.
[108] M. J. Littlejohn,et al. REINFORCEMENT AND REPRODUCTIVE CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT IN GASTROPHRYNE CAROLINENSIS AND G. OLIVACEA (ANURA: MICROHYLIDAE): A REEXAMINATION , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[109] J. Coyne. Genetics of sexual isolation in females of the Drosophila simulans species complex. , 1992, Genetical research.
[110] J. Mcphail. Ecology and evolution of sympatric sticklebacks (Gasterosteus): evidence for a species-pair in Paxton Lake, Texada Island, British Columbia , 1992 .
[111] C. Carlton,et al. Evidence of Genetic Dominance of the 13-year Life Cycle in Periodical Cicadas (Homoptera: Cicadidae: Magicicada spp.) , 1991 .
[112] A. Grafen. Biological signals as handicaps. , 1990, Journal of theoretical biology.
[113] C. Löfstedt,et al. No linkage between genes controlling female pheromone production and male pheromone response in the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis Hübner (Lepidoptera; Pyralidae). , 1989, Genetics.
[114] N. Sanderson. CAN GENE FLOW PREVENT REINFORCEMENT? , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[115] H. A. Orr,et al. PATTERNS OF SPECIATION IN DROSOPHILA , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[116] E. Zouros,et al. MALE HYBRID STERILITY IN DROSOPHILA: INTERACTIONS BETWEEN AUTOSOMES AND SEX CHROMOSOMES IN CROSSES OF D. MOJAVENSIS AND D. ARIZONENSIS , 1988, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[117] André A. Dhondt,et al. The anti-exhaustion hypothesis: a new hypothesis to explain song performance and song switching in the great tit , 1988, Animal Behaviour.
[118] J. A. Martin,et al. Reproductive Incompatibility Between Host Strains of the Fall Armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) , 1987 .
[119] H. A. Orr,et al. Genetics of male and female sterility in hybrids of Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. , 1987, Genetics.
[120] R. Butlin. Speciation by reinforcement. , 1987, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[121] J. Mcphail. Ecology and evolution of sympatric sticklebacks (Gasterosteus): morphological and genetic evidence for a species pair in Enos Lake, British Columbia , 1984 .
[122] Joseph H. Connell,et al. On the Prevalence and Relative Importance of Interspecific Competition: Evidence from Field Experiments , 1983, The American Naturalist.
[123] C. Simon,et al. A SIMPLE MENDELIAN MODEL FOR 13‐ AND 17‐ YEAR LIFE CYCLES OF PERIODICAL CICADAS, WITH HISTORICAL EVIDENCE OF HYBRIDIZATION BETWEEN THEM , 1983, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[124] A. Kondrashov. Multilocus model of sympatric speciation. I: One character , 1983 .
[125] Thomas W. Schoener,et al. Field Experiments on Interspecific Competition , 1983, The American Naturalist.
[126] M. Kirkpatrick. SEXUAL SELECTION AND THE EVOLUTION OF FEMALE CHOICE , 1982, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[127] R. Lande. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[128] E. Zouros. The chromosomal basis of sexual isolation in two sibling species of Drosophila: D. arizonensis and D. mojavensis. , 1981, Genetics.
[129] J. Felsenstein. SKEPTICISM TOWARDS SANTA ROSALIA, OR WHY ARE THERE SO FEW KINDS OF ANIMALS? , 1981, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[130] M. Wasserman,et al. CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT FOR SEXUAL ISOLATION BETWEEN DROSOPHILA MOJAVENSIS AND DROSOPHILA ARIZONENSIS , 1977, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[131] T. J. Walker,et al. Character Displacement and Acoustic Insects , 1974 .
[132] M. Feldman,et al. Selection for migration modification. , 1973, Genetics.
[133] M. White. Chromosomal Rearrangements and Speciation in Animals , 1969 .
[134] R. Bigelow. HYBRID ZONES AND REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION , 1965 .
[135] K. Lorenz,et al. King Solomon's Ring , 1949 .
[136] T. Dobzhansky. Genetics and the Origin of Species , 1937 .
[137] R. Punnett,et al. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1930, Nature.
[138] V. Volterra. Variations and Fluctuations of the Number of Individuals in Animal Species living together , 1928 .
[139] V. Volterra. Fluctuations in the Abundance of a Species considered Mathematically , 1926 .
[140] B. Dreyfus,et al. Divergent sexual selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks , 2022 .