Nuclear nano-morphology markers of histologically normal cells detect the “field effect” of breast cancer

Accurate detection of breast malignancy from histologically normal cells (“field effect”) has significant clinical implications in a broad base of breast cancer management, such as high-risk lesion management, personalized risk assessment, breast tumor recurrence, and tumor margin management. More accurate and clinically applicable tools to detect markers characteristic of breast cancer “field effect” that are able to guide the clinical management are urgently needed. We have recently developed a novel optical microscope, spatial-domain low-coherence quantitative phase microscopy, which extracts the nanoscale structural characteristics of cell nuclei (i.e., nuclear nano-morphology markers), using standard histology slides. In this proof-of-concept study, we present the use of these highly sensitive nuclear nano-morphology markers to identify breast malignancy from histologically normal cells. We investigated the nano-morphology markers from 154 patients with a broad spectrum of breast pathology entities, including normal breast tissue, non-proliferative benign lesions, proliferative lesions (without and with atypia), “malignant-adjacent” normal tissue, and invasive carcinoma. Our results show that the nuclear nano-morphology markers of “malignant-adjacent” normal tissue can detect the presence of invasive breast carcinoma with high accuracy and do not reflect normal aging. Further, we found that a progressive change in nuclear nano-morphology markers that parallel breast cancer risk, suggesting its potential use for risk stratification. These novel nano-morphology markers that detect breast cancerous changes from nanoscale structural characteristics of histologically normal cells could potentially benefit the diagnosis, risk assessment, prognosis, prevention, and treatment of breast cancer.

[1]  Robert A. Weinberg,et al.  Expression of TERT in early premalignant lesions and a subset of cells in normal tissues , 1998, Nature Genetics.

[2]  Vadim Backman,et al.  Light-scattering technologies for field carcinogenesis detection: a modality for endoscopic prescreening. , 2011, Gastroenterology.

[3]  Rohit Bhargava,et al.  Spatial-domain low-coherence quantitative phase microscopy for cancer diagnosis. , 2010, Optics letters.

[4]  Timothy J. Yeatman,et al.  Mapping Geographic Zones of Cancer Risk with Epigenetic Biomarkers in Normal Breast Tissue , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[5]  D. Slaughter,et al.  “Field cancerization” in oral stratified squamous epithelium. Clinical implications of multicentric origin , 1953, Cancer.

[6]  A. Gazdar,et al.  Surrogate anatomic/functional sites for evaluating cancer risk: an extension of the field effect. , 1999, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[7]  Robert E. Brown,et al.  Field effect in cancer-an update. , 2009, Annals of clinical and laboratory science.

[8]  R. Mansel,et al.  Benign breast disorders. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  D. Hall Analyzing Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves With SAS , 2008 .

[10]  Vadim Backman,et al.  Nanoscale cellular changes in field carcinogenesis detected by partial wave spectroscopy. , 2009, Cancer research.

[11]  R. Brand,et al.  Quantification of nanoscale nuclear refractive index changes during the cell cycle. , 2011, Journal of biomedical optics.

[12]  Shikhar Uttam,et al.  Nanoscale nuclear architecture for cancer diagnosis beyond pathology via spatial-domain low-coherence quantitative phase microscopy. , 2010, Journal of biomedical optics.

[13]  R. Brand,et al.  Investigation of nuclear nano-morphology marker as a biomarker for cancer risk assessment using a mouse model. , 2012, Journal of biomedical optics.

[14]  R. Brand,et al.  Correction of stain variations in nuclear refractive index of clinical histology specimens. , 2011, Journal of biomedical optics.

[15]  A. Toland,et al.  Epigenetic alterations in the breast: Implications for breast cancer detection, prognosis and treatment. , 2009, Seminars in cancer biology.

[16]  Thea D. Tlsty,et al.  Benign breast disease and the risk of breast cancer. , 2005 .

[17]  R. Brand,et al.  An insight into statistical refractive index properties of cell internal structure via low-coherence statistical amplitude microscopy , 2010, Optics express.

[18]  G. Dakubo,et al.  Clinical implications and utility of field cancerization , 2007, Cancer Cell International.

[19]  A. Thor,et al.  Loss of Heterozygosity in Normal Tissue Adjacent to Breast Carcinomas , 1996, Science.

[20]  W D Dupont,et al.  Risk factors for breast cancer in women with proliferative breast disease. , 1985, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  J. Minna,et al.  Promoter hypermethylation in benign breast epithelium in relation to predicted breast cancer risk. , 2005, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[22]  S. Baylin,et al.  Methylation of the oestrogen receptor CpG island links ageing and neoplasia in human colon , 1994, Nature Genetics.

[23]  L. Cupples,et al.  Genetically abnormal clones in histologically normal breast tissue. , 1998, The American journal of pathology.

[24]  Yusuke Nakamura,et al.  Genetic studies of 457 breast cancers. Clinicopathologic parameters compared with genetic alterations , 1994, Cancer.

[25]  Allen Taflove,et al.  Optical methodology for detecting histologically unapparent nanoscale consequences of genetic alterations in biological cells , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  William C Hines,et al.  Telomere DNA content and allelic imbalance demonstrate field cancerization in histologically normal tissue adjacent to breast tumors , 2006, International journal of cancer.

[27]  V. Backman,et al.  Nanocytology for field carcinogenesis detection: novel paradigm for lung cancer risk stratification. , 2011, Future oncology.

[28]  J. Issa Epigenetic variation and human disease. , 2002, The Journal of nutrition.

[29]  Olufunmilayo I. Olopade,et al.  Breast cancer risk associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 in diverse populations , 2007, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[30]  C. Langmead,et al.  Using optical markers of nondysplastic rectal epithelial cells to identify patients with ulcerative colitis‐associated neoplasia , 2011, Inflammatory bowel diseases.

[31]  Vadim Backman,et al.  Optical detection of buccal epithelial nanoarchitectural alterations in patients harboring lung cancer: implications for screening. , 2010, Cancer research.

[32]  C. Heaphy,et al.  Mammary field cancerization: molecular evidence and clinical importance , 2009, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.