Intracranial contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance venography with 6.4‐fold sensitivity encoding at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla

To prospectively compare vessel conspicuity and diagnostic image quality between three‐dimensional intracranial contrast‐enhanced MR venography acquired at 1.5 Tesla (T) and 3.0T, with 6.4‐fold sensitivity encoding.

[1]  High‐resolution imaging of the intracranial arterial and venous systems following a single contrast injection , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[2]  Klaus Sartor,et al.  More reliable noninvasive visualization of the cerebral veins and dural sinuses: comparison of three MR angiographic techniques. , 2002, Radiology.

[3]  Graham A Wright,et al.  Intracranial venous system: gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR venography with auto-triggered elliptic centric-ordered sequence--initial experience. , 2003, Radiology.

[4]  James F Glockner,et al.  Combination of 2D sensitivity encoding and 2D partial fourier techniques for improved acceleration in 3D contrast‐enhanced MR angiography , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  Gerhard Schroth,et al.  Fast contrast-enhanced MR whole-brain venography , 2002, Neuroradiology.

[6]  S. Riederer,et al.  High-spatial-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the intracranial venous system with fourfold accelerated two-dimensional sensitivity encoding. , 2007, Radiology.

[7]  Stephen J Riederer,et al.  Intrinsic signal amplification in the application of 2D SENSE parallel imaging to 3D contrast‐enhanced elliptical centric MRA and MRV , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  R R Edelman,et al.  Intracerebral arteriovenous malformations: evaluation with selective MR angiography and venography. , 1989, Radiology.

[9]  R R Edelman,et al.  Cerebral venography with MR. , 1991, Radiology.

[10]  P. Boesiger,et al.  SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  A. Villringer,et al.  Dural sinus thrombosis: value of venous MR angiography for diagnosis and follow-up. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  M. Kitajima,et al.  Evaluation of the intracranial dural sinuses with a 3D contrast-enhanced MP-RAGE sequence: prospective comparison with 2D-TOF MR venography and digital subtraction angiography. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[13]  Paul M. Parizel,et al.  MR angiography of the intracranial vessels: technical aspects and clinical applications , 2004, Neuroradiology.

[14]  Raja Muthupillai,et al.  Parallel Imaging in MR Angiography , 2004, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[15]  D. Dormont,et al.  Gadolinium-enhanced MR of chronic dural sinus thrombosis. , 1995, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[16]  J Huston,et al.  Magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla: initial clinical experience. , 2001, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[17]  J Paul Finn,et al.  Three-Dimensional Cerebral Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Venography at 3.0 Tesla: Initial Results Using Highly Accelerated Parallel Acquisition , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[18]  F. Fera,et al.  Comparison of different MR venography techniques for detecting transverse sinus stenosis in idiopathic intracranial hypertension , 2005, Journal of Neurology.

[19]  R. Alberico,et al.  Cerebral venography: comparison of CT and MR projection venography. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  Bernard R. Rosner,et al.  Fundamentals of Biostatistics. , 1992 .

[21]  Klaas P Pruessmann,et al.  Parallel Imaging at High Field Strength: Synergies and Joint Potential , 2004, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.