Pelvic Tilt and Truncal Inclination: Two Key Radiographic Parameters in the Setting of Adults With Spinal Deformity

Study Design. Prospective radiographic and clinical analysis. Objective. Investigate the relationship between spino-pelvic parameters and patient self reported outcomes on adult subjects with spinal deformities. Summary of Background Data. It is becoming increasingly recognized that the study of spinal alignment should include pelvic position. While pelvic incidence determines lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt (PT) is a positional parameter reflecting compensation to spinal deformity. Correlation between plumbline offset (sagittal vertical axis [SVA]) and Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) measures has been demonstrated, but such a study is lacking for PT. Methods. This prospective study was carried out on 125 adult patients suffering from spinal deformity (mean age: 57 years). Full-length free-standing radiographs including the spine and pelvis were available for all patients. HRQOL instruments included: Oswestry Disability Index, Short Form-12, Scoliosis Research Society. Correlation analysis between radiographic spinopelvic parameters and HRQOL measures was pursued. Results. Correlation analysis revealed no significance pertaining to coronal plane parameters. Significant sagittal plane correlations were identified. SVA and truncal inclination measured by T1 spinopelvic inclination (T1–SPI) (angle between T1–hip axis and vertical) correlated with: Scoliosis Research Society (appearance, activity, total score), Oswestry Disability Index, and Short Form-12 (physical component score). Correlation coefficients ranged from 0.42 < r < 0.55 (P < 0.0001). T1–SPI revealed greater correlation with HRQOL compared to SVA. PT showed correlation with HRQOL (0.28 < r < 0.42) and with SVA (r = 0.64, P < 0.0001). Conclusion. This study confirms that pelvic position measured via PT correlates with HRQOL in the setting of adult deformity. High values of PT express compensatory pelvic retroversion for sagittal spinal malalignment. This study also demonstrates significant T1–SPI correlation with HRQOL measures and outperforms SVA. This parameter carries the advantage of being an angular measurement which avoids the error inherent in measuring offsets in noncalibrated radiographs.

[1]  B. Ilharreborde,et al.  Intra and inter-observer reliability of determining degree of pelvic incidence in high-grade spondylolisthesis using a computer assisted method , 2006, European Spine Journal.

[2]  F. Schwab,et al.  Adult Scoliosis: Prevalence, SF-36, and Nutritional Parameters in an Elderly Volunteer Population , 2005, Spine.

[3]  Shigenobu Sato,et al.  Spinopelvic Alignment in Patients With Osteoarthrosis of the Hip: A Radiographic Comparison to Patients with Low Back Pain , 2005, Spine.

[4]  P. Roussouly,et al.  Classification of the Normal Variation in the Sagittal Alignment of the Human Lumbar Spine and Pelvis in the Standing Position , 2005, Spine.

[5]  J. Vidal,et al.  [Morphology and anteroposterior body equilibrium in spondylolisthesis L5-S1]. , 1983, Revue de chirurgie orthopedique et reparatrice de l'appareil moteur.

[6]  William Horton,et al.  Correlation of Radiographic Parameters and Clinical Symptoms in Adult Scoliosis , 2005, Spine.

[7]  S. Hansen,et al.  Sagittal alignment in lumbosacral fusion: relations between radiological parameters and pain , 2000, European Spine Journal.

[8]  K. Bridwell,et al.  A Clinical Impact Classification of Scoliosis in the Adult , 2006, Spine.

[9]  C. Marty,et al.  Equilibre sagittal du rachis. Relations entre bassin et courbures rachidiennes sagittales en position debout , 1993 .

[10]  Stuart L. Weinstein,et al.  The Pediatric Spine: Principles and Practice , 2001 .

[11]  William Horton,et al.  The Impact of Positive Sagittal Balance in Adult Spinal Deformity , 2005, Spine.

[12]  Courtney W. Brown,et al.  Is There an Optimal Patient Stance for Obtaining a Lateral 36” Radiograph?: A Critical Comparison of Three Techniques , 2005, Spine.

[13]  F Lavaste,et al.  Computer-assisted assessment of spinal sagittal plane radiographs. , 2001, Journal of spinal disorders.

[14]  P. Roussouly,et al.  [Geometrical and mechanical analysis of lumbar lordosis in an asymptomatic population: proposed classification]. , 2003, Revue de chirurgie orthopedique et reparatrice de l'appareil moteur.

[15]  F. Schwab,et al.  Adult Scoliosis: A Quantitative Radiographic and Clinical Analysis , 2002, Spine.

[16]  F. Schwab,et al.  Adult Scoliosis: A Health Assessment Analysis by SF-36 , 2003, Spine.

[17]  J. Legaye,et al.  Sagittal plane alignment of the spine and gravity: a radiological and clinical evaluation. , 2005, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[18]  Wafa Skalli,et al.  Gravity Line Analysis in Adult Volunteers: Age-Related Correlation With Spinal Parameters, Pelvic Parameters, and Foot Position , 2006, Spine.

[19]  J. Jang,et al.  CAN PATIENTS WITH SAGITTALLY WELL‐COMPENSATED LUMBAR DEGENERATIVE KYPHOSIS BENEFIT FROM SURGICAL TREATMENT FOR INTRACTABLE BACK PAIN? , 2009, Neurosurgery.

[20]  J. Hecquet,et al.  Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves , 1998, European Spine Journal.

[21]  Wafa Skalli,et al.  Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[22]  J. Vidal,et al.  [Sagittal deviations of the spine, and trial of classification as a function of the pelvic balance]. , 1984, Revue de chirurgie orthopedique et reparatrice de l'appareil moteur.

[23]  W. Skalli,et al.  Validation of new clinical quantitative analysis software applicable in spine orthopaedic studies , 2006, European Spine Journal.