Technological frames in the digital age: Theory, measurment instrument, and future research areas

[1]  J. L. Price,et al.  Discriminant validity of measures of job satisfaction, positive affectivity and negative affectivity , 1992 .

[2]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Digital Innovation Management: Reinventing Innovation Management Research in a Digital World , 2017, MIS Q..

[3]  J. Dutton,et al.  Categorizing Strategic Issues: Links to Organizational Action , 1987 .

[4]  E. Davidson.  A Technological Frames Perspective on Information Technology and Organizational Change , 2006 .

[5]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations , 1994, TOIS.

[6]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[7]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  The Microfoundations Movement in Strategy and Organization Theory , 2015 .

[8]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Editorial - Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling: Rigorous Applications, Better Results and Higher Acceptance , 2013 .

[9]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Organizational Colleagues, Media Richness, and Electronic Mail , 1991 .

[10]  Martin Wetzels,et al.  Hierarchical latent variable models in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using reflective-formative type models , 2012 .

[11]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Innovation Blindness: Culture, Frames and Cross-Boundary Problem Construction in the Development of New Technology Concepts , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[12]  Elizabeth J. Davidson,et al.  Inconsistent and Incongruent Frames During IT-enabled Change: An Action Research Study into Sales Process Innovation , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[13]  M. Sarstedt,et al.  A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling , 2015 .

[14]  G. Krogh.  Artificial Intelligence in Organizations: New Opportunities for Phenomenon-Based Theorizing , 2018, Academy of Management Discoveries.

[15]  Christian Hicks,et al.  How political processes shaped the IT adopted by a small make-to-order company: a case study in the insulated wire and cable industry , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[16]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[17]  Shaul Oreg,et al.  Change Recipients’ Reactions to Organizational Change , 2011 .

[18]  Sarah Kaplan.  Research in Cognition and Strategy: Reflections on Two Decades of Progress and a Look to the Future , 2010 .

[19]  Timothy R. Hinkin.  A Review of Scale Development Practices in the Study of Organizations , 1995 .

[20]  Steven M. Elias,et al.  Employee Commitment in Times of Change: Assessing the Importance of Attitudes Toward Organizational Change † , 2009 .

[21]  Thomas Hess,et al.  Digital transformation strategy making in pre-digital organizations: The case of a financial services provider , 2019, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[22]  F. Hoy,et al.  Corporate Entrepreneurship and Family Business: Learning Across Domains , 2020 .

[23]  Mary Tripsas,et al.  Thinking About Technology: Applying a Cognitive Lens to Technical Change , 2008 .

[24]  Leonardo Liberman,et al.  Toward a Model of Understanding Strategic Decision-Making in Micro-Firms: Exploring the Australian Information Technology Sector , 2010 .

[25]  P. Leonardi,et al.  What’s Under Construction Here? Social Action, Materiality, and Power in Constructivist Studies of Technology and Organizing , 2010 .

[26]  J. P. Eggers,et al.  Cognition and Capabilities: A Multi-Level Perspective , 2013 .

[27]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Social Cognitive Theory and Individual Reactions to Computing Technology: A Longitudinal Study , 1999, MIS Q..

[28]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace1 , 1992 .

[29]  Timothy R. Hannigan,et al.  Rumor Communities, Social Media, and Forthcoming Innovations: The Shaping of Technological Frames in Product Market Evolution , 2020, Academy of Management Review.

[30]  Fabrice Cavarretta,et al.  Who Changes Course? The Role of Domain Knowledge and Novel Framing in Making Technology Changes , 2012 .

[31]  R. Garud,et al.  Perspectives on Disruptive Innovations , 2018, Journal of Management Studies.

[32]  T. Pinch,et al.  The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other , 1984 .

[33]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Making e-Government systems workable: Exploring the evolution of frames , 2008, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[34]  Klaus Weber,et al.  When the Glass is Half Full and Half Empty: CEO's Ambivalent Interpretations of Strategic Issues , 2010 .

[35]  Paul M. Leonardi,et al.  Minding the Gaps: Understanding Technology Interdependence and Coordination in Knowledge Work , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[36]  Patrick Spieth,et al.  Managerial Political Behavior in Innovation Portfolio Management: A Sensegiving and Sensebreaking Process , 2019, Journal of Product Innovation Management.

[37]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[38]  Christine M. Beckman.  The Influence of Founding Team Company Affiliations on Firm Behavior , 2006 .

[39]  J. M. Cortina,et al.  What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications , 1993 .

[40]  S. Ashford,et al.  Content, Cause, and Consequences of Job Insecurity: A Theory-Based Measure and Substantive Test , 1989 .

[41]  Stefano Brusoni,et al.  Virtual Design, Problem Framing, and Innovation: An Empirical Study in the Automotive Industry , 2010 .

[42]  Melissa Mazmanian.  Avoiding the Trap of Constant Connectivity: When Congruent Frames Allow for Heterogeneous Practices , 2013 .

[43]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization , 1991, MIS Q..

[44]  Karin Olesen,et al.  Implications of dominant technological frames over a longitudinal period , 2014, Inf. Syst. J..

[45]  Callen Anthony.  To Question or Accept? How Status Differences Influence Responses to New Epistemic Technologies in Knowledge Work , 2018, Academy of Management Review.

[46]  Nicolai J. Foss,et al.  Institutions as Knowledge Capital: Ludwig M' Lachmann's Interpretative Institutionalism , 2006 .

[47]  M. Lindell,et al.  Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[48]  Gregory Vial,et al.  Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda , 2019, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[49]  Elizabeth J. Davidson,et al.  Technology Frames and Framing: A Socio-Cognitive Investigation of Requirements Determination , 2002, MIS Q..

[50]  John P. Meyer,et al.  Commitment to organizational change: extension of a three-component model. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[51]  J. Cornelissen,et al.  Putting Framing in Perspective: A Review of Framing and Frame Analysis across the Management and Organizational Literature , 2014 .

[52]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Technological Frames, Organizational Capabilities, and IT Use: An Empirical Investigation of Electronic Procurement , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[53]  Jonathan P. Allen,et al.  IT and the video game industry: tensions and mutual shaping , 2005, J. Inf. Technol..

[54]  E. V. van Raaij,et al.  Framing and Interorganizational Knowledge Transfer: A Process Study of Collaborative Innovation in the Aircraft Industry , 2014 .

[55]  V. Narayanamurti,et al.  Why matter matters: How technology characteristics shape the strategic framing of technologies , 2020, Research Policy.