Positive surgical margins in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multi-institutional analysis of oncologic outcomes (leave no tumor behind).

PURPOSE Expanding indications for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy raise major oncologic concerns for positive surgical margins. Previous reports showed no correlation between positive surgical margins and oncologic outcomes. We report a multi-institutional experience with the oncologic outcomes of positive surgical margins on robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Pathological and clinical followup data were reviewed from an institutional review board approved, prospectively maintained joint database from 5 institutions. Tumors with malignant pathology were isolated and statistically analyzed for demographics and oncologic followup. The log rank test was used to compare recurrence-free and metastasis-free survival between patients with positive and negative surgical margins. The proportional hazards method was used to assess the influence of multiple factors, including positive surgical margins, on recurrence and metastasis. RESULTS A total of 943 robot-assisted partial nephrectomies for malignant tumors were successfully completed. Of the patients 21 (2.2%) had positive surgical margins on final pathological assessment, resulting in 2 groups, including the 21 with positive surgical margins and 922 with negative surgical margins. Positive surgical margin cases had higher recurrence and metastasis rates (p<0.001). As projected by the Kaplan-Meier method in the population as a whole at followup out to 63.6 months, 5-year recurrence-free and metastasis-free survival was 94.8% and 97.5%, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in recurrence-free and metastasis-free survival between patients with positive and negative surgical margins (log rank test<0.001), which favored negative surgical margins. Positive surgical margins showed an 18.4-fold higher HR for recurrence when adjusted for multiple tumors, tumor size, tumor growth pattern and pathological stage. CONCLUSIONS Positive surgical margins on final pathological evaluation increase the HR of recurrence and metastasis. In addition to pathological and molecular tumor characteristics, this should be considered to plan appropriate management.

[1]  M. Stifelman,et al.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: the NYU technique. , 2005, Journal of endourology.

[2]  J. Kaouk,et al.  Outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy for renal masses with nephrometry score of ≥7. , 2011, Urology.

[3]  S. Bhayani,et al.  Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: evaluation of learning curve for an experienced renal surgeon. , 2010, Journal of endourology.

[4]  P Fornara,et al.  Positive margins in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in 855 cases: a multi-institutional survey from the United States and Europe. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[5]  R. Rocha,et al.  CD133 immunohistochemical expression predicts progression and cancer-related death in renal cell carcinoma , 2011, World Journal of Urology.

[6]  F. Algaba,et al.  What does the urologist expect from the pathologist (and what can the pathologists give) in reporting on adult kidney tumour specimens? , 2007, European urology.

[7]  Paul Russo,et al.  Impact of positive surgical margins in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for renal cortical tumours , 2007, BJU international.

[8]  R. Grubb,et al.  Positive margin during partial nephrectomy: does cancer remain in the renal remnant? , 2011, Urology.

[9]  Alcides Chaux,et al.  Determination of the Nonlethal Margin Inside the Visible “Ice-Ball” During Percutaneous Cryoablation of Renal Tissue , 2013, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[10]  W. G. Cochran.  Some Methods for Strengthening the Common χ 2 Tests , 1954 .

[11]  J. Kaouk,et al.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: step-by-step contemporary technique and surgical outcomes at a single high-volume institution. , 2012, European urology.

[12]  A. Novick,et al.  Long-term results of nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: 10-year followup. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[13]  M. Vincenti,et al.  Interleukin-1β mediates metalloproteinase-dependent renal cell carcinoma tumor cell invasion through the activation of CCAAT enhancer binding protein β , 2012, Cancer medicine.

[14]  C. Rogers,et al.  Robotic partial nephrectomy: surgical technique , 2011, BJU international.

[15]  M. Resnick,et al.  Does the size of the surgical margin in partial nephrectomy for renal cell cancer really matter? , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[16]  S. Bhayani,et al.  Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: an international experience. , 2010, European urology.

[17]  J. Myles,et al.  Prognostic importance of resection margin width after nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma. , 2002, Urology.

[18]  K. Bensalah,et al.  Positive surgical margin appears to have negligible impact on survival of renal cell carcinomas treated by nephron-sparing surgery. , 2010, European urology.

[19]  B. Lane,et al.  Nephron‐sparing surgery , 2007, BJU international.

[20]  F. Harrell,et al.  Prognostic/Clinical Prediction Models: Multivariable Prognostic Models: Issues in Developing Models, Evaluating Assumptions and Adequacy, and Measuring and Reducing Errors , 2005 .

[21]  P. Puppo,et al.  Long term results of excision of small renal cancer surrounded by a minimal layer of grossly normal parenchyma: review of 94 cases. , 2004, European urology.

[22]  F. Porpiglia,et al.  Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy: analysis of the current literature. , 2008, European urology.

[23]  L. Kavoussi,et al.  Positive surgical parenchymal margin after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: oncological outcomes. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[24]  Neil Fleshner,et al.  Prevalence and impact on survival of positive surgical margins in partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a population‐based study , 2013, BJU international.

[25]  F. Kai,et al.  Impact of Thymidine Phosphorylase-Expressing Macrophages for Surgical Margin in Partial Nephrectomy , 2009, Urologia Internationalis.

[26]  Klaus Jeschke,et al.  Positive surgical margins after nephron-sparing surgery. , 2012, European urology.

[27]  Jihad H Kaouk,et al.  Nephrectomy induced chronic renal insufficiency is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular death and death from any cause in patients with localized cT1b renal masses. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[28]  J. Kaouk,et al.  Robotic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic cryoablation for the small renal mass. , 2012, European urology.

[29]  M. Carini,et al.  Simple enucleation is equivalent to traditional partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: results of a nonrandomized, retrospective, comparative study. , 2011, The Journal of urology.

[30]  J. Kaouk,et al.  Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: 3-year followup. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[31]  Charles E McCulloch,et al.  Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression. , 2007, American journal of epidemiology.

[32]  J. Kaouk,et al.  Letters to the Editor/Errata Re: Functional Recovery after Partial Nephrectomy: Effects of Volume Loss and Ischemic Injury , 2012 .

[33]  Ian S Hagemann,et al.  Letters to the Editor/Errata Re: A Retrospective Comparison of 2 Methods of Intraoperative Margin Evaluation During Partial Nephrectomy , 2009 .

[34]  M. Carini,et al.  Histopathologic analysis of peritumoral pseudocapsule and surgical margin status after tumor enucleation for renal cell carcinoma. , 2009, European urology.

[35]  Paul Russo,et al.  Positive surgical margins at partial nephrectomy: predictors and oncological outcomes. , 2008, The Journal of urology.

[36]  J. Kaouk,et al.  Utility of intraoperative frozen section during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a single institution experience. , 2013, Journal of endourology.