One of the more disturbing features of intellectual life at the present time is the way in which irrationalism is so widely advocated, and irrationalist doctrines taken for granted. In my view, one of the main components of modern irrationalism is relativism (the doctrine that truth is relative to our intellectual background or framework: that it may change from one framework to another), and, in particular, the doctrine of the impossibility of mutual understanding between different cultures, generations, or historical periods. In this paper I discuss the problem of relativism. It is my claim that behind it lies what I call ‘The Myth of the Framework’. I explain and criticize this myth, and comment also on arguments due to Quine, Kuhn, and Whorf which have been used in its defence.
[1]
A. R. Turquette,et al.
Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics
,
1957
.
[2]
Karl R. Popper,et al.
The Open Society and Its Enemies
,
1946
.
[3]
Willard Van Orman Quine,et al.
Word and Object
,
1960
.
[4]
T. Broadbent,et al.
Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge
,
1972
.
[5]
T. Kuhn,et al.
Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: Reflections on my Critics
,
1970
.
[6]
John B. Carroll,et al.
Language, Thought and Reality
,
2020
.
[7]
Karl R. Popper,et al.
Quantum Mechanics without “The Observer”
,
1967
.
[8]
W. Quine.
Ontological Relativity and Other Essays
,
1969
.
[9]
J. Bell.
On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox
,
1964
.