Parametric electrical impedance tomography for measuring bone mineral density in the pelvis using a computational model.

Osteoporosis is defined as bone microstructure deterioration resulting a decrease of bone's strength. Measured bone mineral density (BMD) constitutes the main tool for Osteoporosis diagnosis, management, and defines patient's fracture risk. In the present study, parametric electrical impedance tomography (pEIT) method was examined for monitoring BMD, using a computerized simulation model and preliminary real measurements. A numerical solver was developed to simulate surface potentials measured over a 3D computerized pelvis model. Varying cortical and cancellous BMD were simulated by changing bone conductivity and permittivity. Up to 35% and 16% change was found in the real and imaginary modules of the calculated potential, respectively, while BMD changes from 100% (normal) to 60% (Osteoporosis). Negligible BMD relative error was obtained with SNR>60 [dB]. Position changes errors indicate that for long term monitoring, measurement should be taken at the same geometrical configuration with great accuracy. The numerical simulations were compared to actual measurements that were acquired from a healthy male subject using a five electrodes belt bioimpedance device. The results suggest that pEIT may provide an inexpensive easy to use tool for frequent monitoring BMD in small clinics during pharmacological treatment, as a complementary method to DEXA test.

[1]  T. Tomomitsu,et al.  Diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis: year 2012 revision , 2013, Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism.

[2]  S. Cummings,et al.  Evaluating the value of repeat bone mineral density measurement and prediction of fractures in older women: the study of osteoporotic fractures. , 2007, Archives of internal medicine.

[3]  W. O'Fallon,et al.  Bone Density and Fracture Risk in Men , 1998, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[4]  T. Abbott,et al.  Patients with Prior Fractures Have an Increased Risk of Future Fractures: A Summary of the Literature and Statistical Synthesis , 2000, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[5]  Narasimhan Rajaram,et al.  Lookup table-based inverse model for determining optical properties of turbid media. , 2008, Journal of biomedical optics.

[6]  R Bragós,et al.  A parallel broadband real-time system for electrical impedance tomography. , 1996, Physiological measurement.

[7]  T. Yao,et al.  Bioimpedance: can its addition to simple clinical criteria enhance the diagnosis of osteoporosis? , 2009, Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism.

[8]  O. Johnell,et al.  Long-Term Risk of Osteoporotic Fracture in Malmö , 2000, Osteoporosis International.

[9]  C. M. Langton,et al.  The role of ultrasound in the assessment of osteoporosis: A review , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[10]  P. P. Vaidyanathan,et al.  Look-up table (LUT) method for inverse halftoning , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[11]  Sharon Zlochiver,et al.  Induced Current Bio-impedance Technique for Monitoring Bone Mineral Density—A Simulation Model , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  R. W. Lau,et al.  The dielectric properties of biological tissues: II. Measurements in the frequency range 10 Hz to 20 GHz. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  Shimon Abboud,et al.  Assessment of cardiac stroke volume in patients with implanted cardiac pacemaker using parametric electrical impedance tomography: A theoretical 2D study , 2013, International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering.

[14]  David Isaacson,et al.  Electrical Impedance Tomography , 1999, SIAM Rev..

[15]  Wei He,et al.  A new method of noninvasive brain-edema monitoring in stroke: cerebral electrical impedance measurement , 2006, Neurological research.

[16]  S. Abboud,et al.  Monitoring brain damage using bioimpedance technique in a 3D numerical model of the head. , 2015, Medical engineering & physics.

[17]  H Weinans,et al.  Interrelationships between electrical properties and microstructure of human trabecular bone , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  E. Cherkaev,et al.  Electrical impedance spectroscopy as a potential tool for recovering bone porosity , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  J Töyräs,et al.  Electrical and dielectric properties of bovine trabecular bone—relationships with mechanical properties and mineral density , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  D. B. Heppner,et al.  Considerations of quasi-stationarity in electrophysiological systems. , 1967, The Bulletin of mathematical biophysics.

[21]  J. Cauley,et al.  BMD screening in older women: Initial measurement and testing interval , 2012, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[22]  D. Ransohoff,et al.  Bone-density testing interval and transition to osteoporosis in older women. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  Subrata Saha,et al.  The electrical and dielectric properties of human bone tissue and their relationship with density and bone mineral content , 1996, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  S Abboud,et al.  Parametric EIT for monitoring cardiac stroke volume , 2006, Physiological measurement.

[25]  J. Kanis,et al.  Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: Synopsis of a WHO report , 1994, Osteoporosis International.

[26]  Richard H. Bayford,et al.  Three-Dimensional Electrical Impedance Tomography of Human Brain Activity , 2001, NeuroImage.

[27]  Shimon Abboud,et al.  Bioimpedance technique for monitoring cerebral artery stenosis in a 3D numerical model of the head. , 2012, Medical engineering & physics.

[28]  T. Faes,et al.  Electrical impedance tomography to measure pulmonary perfusion: is the reproducibility high enough for clinical practice? , 2003, Physiological measurement.

[29]  A. Demirci,et al.  Bone mineral density measurement by quantitative computed tomography in a normal Turkish population. , 1995, European journal of radiology.

[30]  Willis J. Tompkins,et al.  Comparing Reconstruction Algorithms for Electrical Impedance Tomography , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[31]  R Bragós,et al.  In Vivo and In Situ Ischemic Tissue Characterization Using Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy a , 1999, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Ramon Bragós,et al.  Improvement of a Front End for Bioimpedance Spectroscopy a , 1999 .

[33]  B H Brown,et al.  Electrical impedance tomography (EIT): a review , 2003, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[34]  B. L. Riggs,et al.  A Unitary Model for Involutional Osteoporosis: Estrogen Deficiency Causes Both Type I and Type II Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women and Contributes to Bone Loss in Aging Men , 1998, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[35]  C. Cooper,et al.  Perspective how many women have osteoporosis? , 1992, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[36]  Thomas M Link,et al.  osteoporosis imaging : State of the Art and Advanced Imaging 1 , 2022 .

[37]  Moshe Rosenfeld,et al.  Induced Current Impedance Technique for Monitoring Brain Cryosurgery in a Two-Dimensional Model of the Head , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[38]  S. Saha,et al.  Electrical and Dielectric Properties of Wet Bone as a Function of Frequency , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[39]  O. Johnell,et al.  World-wide Projections for Hip Fracture , 1997, Osteoporosis International.

[40]  R H Bayford,et al.  Multi-frequency electrical impedance tomography (EIT) of the adult human head: initial findings in brain tumours, arteriovenous malformations and chronic stroke, development of an analysis method and calibration , 2006, Physiological measurement.

[41]  R. Pethig,et al.  Dielectric properties of body tissues. , 1987, Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

[42]  David A Hanley,et al.  2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary , 2010, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[43]  K. Foster,et al.  Dielectric Permittivity and Electrical Conductivity of Fluid Saturated Bone , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[44]  D. Miklavčič,et al.  ELECTRIC PROPERTIES OF TISSUES , 2006 .

[45]  C. Gabriel,et al.  Electrical conductivity of tissue at frequencies below 1 MHz , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[46]  U. P. S. T. Force,et al.  Screening for Osteoporosis: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement , 2011, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[47]  Shimon Abboud,et al.  Parametric EIT vs. intra-thoracic impedance for monitoring pulmonary edema using a two dimensional theoretical model of the thorax , 2013, Int. J. Medical Eng. Informatics.

[48]  G. Dougherty,et al.  Quantitative CT in the measurement of bone quantity and bone quality for assessing osteoporosis. , 1996, Medical engineering & physics.