Implicational markedness and frequency in constraint-based computational models of phonological learning.

This study examines the interacting roles of implicational markedness and frequency from the joint perspectives of formal linguistic theory, phonological acquisition and computational modeling. The hypothesis that child grammars are rankings of universal constraints, as in Optimality Theory (Prince & Smolensky, 1993/2004), that learning involves a gradual transition from an unmarked initial state to the target grammar, and that order of acquisition is guided by frequency, along the lines of Levelt, Schiller & Levelt (2000), is investigated. The study reviews empirical findings on syllable structure acquisition in Dutch, German, French and English, and presents novel findings on Polish. These comparisons reveal that, to the extent allowed by implicational markedness universals, frequency covaries with acquisition order across languages. From the computational perspective, the paper shows that interacting roles of markedness and frequency in a class of constraint-based phonological learning models embody this hypothesis, and their predictions are illustrated via computational simulation.

[1]  J. Goldsmith,et al.  The handbook of phonological theory , 2011 .

[2]  Eve V. Clark,et al.  The proceedings of the thirtieth annual : Child Language Research Forum , 2000 .

[3]  C. Lleó,et al.  Consonant clusters in child phonology and the directionality of syllable structure assignment , 1996, Journal of Child Language.

[4]  Y. Miyata,et al.  Harmonic grammar: A formal multi-level connectionist theory of linguistic well-formedness: Theoretic , 1990 .

[5]  Richard M. Weist,et al.  Basic Relations in Child Language and the Word Order Myth , 1986 .

[6]  Gaja Jarosz,et al.  Rich Lexicons and Restrictive Grammars: Maximum Likelihood Learning in Optimality Theory , 2006 .

[7]  Yasuhiro Shirai,et al.  The Acquisition of Lexical and Grammatical Aspect , 2000 .

[8]  Martha Young-Scholten,et al.  Focus on phonological acquisition , 1997 .

[9]  M. Schlesewsky,et al.  Gradience in grammar : generative perspectives , 2006 .

[10]  Elizabeth A. McCullough,et al.  The longitudinal development of clusters in French* , 2008, Journal of Child Language.

[11]  A. Gnanadesikan Constraints in Phonological Acquisition: Markedness and faithfulness constraints in child phonology , 2004 .

[12]  Paulina Zydorowicz Polish morphonotactics in first language acquisition , 2007 .

[13]  J.P.M. Fikkert,et al.  How does Place fall into place? The lexicon and emergent constraints in children's developing phonological grammar , 2008 .

[14]  Giorgio Magri,et al.  Modeling Doubly Marked Lags with a Split Additive Model , 2007 .

[15]  Wim Zonneveld,et al.  Constraints in Phonological Acquisition: Frontmatter , 2004 .

[16]  Bruce Hayes Phonetically Driven Phonology: The role of Optimality Theory and Inductive Grounding [Formalist phonology position paper] , 1999 .

[17]  Cecilia J. Kirk,et al.  Asymmetries in the acquisition of word-initial and word-final consonant clusters , 2005, Journal of Child Language.

[18]  Bertrand Kiefer,et al.  Anything goes , 1991, Nature.

[19]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[20]  D. Ingram The Acquisition Of Word-Initial [v] , 1988, Language and speech.

[21]  Frances Conlin,et al.  Proceedings of the 27th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development , 2003 .

[22]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Gradual constraint-ranking learning algorithm predicts acquisition order , 1999 .

[23]  Katherine Demuth The prosody of syllables, words and morphemes , 2009 .

[24]  K. Demuth,et al.  The Acquisiton of Word-final Clusters in French , 2006 .

[25]  P. Smolensky The Initial State and 'Richness of the Base' in Optimality Theory , 1996 .

[26]  K. Flack The Sources of Phonological Markedness , 2007 .

[27]  G. Jäger,et al.  The winner takes it all — almost: cumulativity in grammatical variation , 2006 .

[28]  Heather Goad,et al.  Consonant Harmony in Child Language: An Optimality-theoretic Account* , 1998 .

[29]  Neilson V. Smith,et al.  The Acquisition of Phonology: A Case Study , 2010 .

[30]  Joe Pater Gradual Learning and Convergence , 2008, Linguistic Inquiry.

[31]  Joe Pater,et al.  Weighted Constraints in Generative Linguistics , 2009, Cogn. Sci..

[32]  P. Boersma Praat : doing phonetics by computer (version 5.1.05) , 2009 .

[33]  J. Blevins The Syllable in Phonological Theory , 1995 .

[34]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[35]  Treebank Penn,et al.  Linguistic Data Consortium , 1999 .

[36]  Sharon Inkelas,et al.  ChildPhon: A Database Solution for the Study of Child Phonology , 2003 .

[37]  P. Fikkert On the acquisition of prosodic structure , 1994 .

[38]  R. Jakobson Child Language, Aphasia and Phonological Universals , 1980 .

[39]  Frank Keller,et al.  Linear Optimality Theory as a Model of Gradience in Grammar , 2006 .

[40]  Kay Atkinson-King,et al.  A First Language: The Early Stages , 1975 .

[41]  R. Weist,et al.  The defective tense hypothesis: on the emergence of tense and aspect in child Polish , 1984, Journal of Child Language.

[42]  R. Shillcock,et al.  Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 1998 .

[43]  Niels O. Schiller,et al.  The Acquisition of Syllable Types , 2000 .

[44]  John Kingston,et al.  Between the grammar and physics of speech , 1994 .

[45]  Mark Johnson,et al.  Learning OT constraint rankings using a maximum entropy model , 2003 .

[46]  B. MacWhinney The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk , 1992 .

[47]  C. Stoel-Gammon,et al.  Development of syllable structure in English-speaking children with particular reference to rhymes , 2001, Journal of Child Language.

[48]  Bruce Tesar,et al.  A Comparison of Lexicographic and Linear Numeric Optimization Using Violation Difference Ratios * , 2007 .

[49]  R. Brown,et al.  A First Language , 1973 .

[50]  G. Clements Papers in Laboratory Phonology: The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification , 1990 .

[51]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar , 2004 .

[52]  M. C. Templin Certain language skills in children : their development and interrelationships , 1957 .

[53]  Bruce P. Hayes,et al.  Phonetically Driven Phonology: The Role of Optimality Theory and Inductive Grounding 1 , 2008 .

[54]  Joe Pater Minimal Violation and Phonological Development , 1997 .

[55]  G. Szagun Learning different regularities: the acquisition of noun plurals by German-speaking children , 2001 .

[56]  Clara C. Levelt,et al.  Syllable Types in Cross-linguistic and Developmental Grammars * , 1998 .

[57]  Gerhard Jäger,et al.  Maximum Entropy Models and Stochastic Optimality Theory , 2003 .

[58]  Karen Jesney,et al.  Biases in Harmonic Grammar: the road to restrictive learning , 2011 .

[59]  B. Lukaszewicz Reduction in syllable onsets in the acquisition of Polish: deletion, coalescence, metathesis and gemination. , 2007, Journal of child language.

[60]  Frederick J. Newmeyer,et al.  Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics: Volume I: General papers , 1999 .