Gender in the making: An empirical approach to understand gender relations in the maker movement

Abstract In this paper we explore gender issues in the maker movement using four different methods of data analysis: standardised questionnaires, analysis of makerspaces’ social media, statistical analysis of machine use and the coding of interviews and focus groups. The objective is to give a voice to female makers and makerspace managers, looking at the maker movement from an inside perspective. The paper demonstrates how gendered stereotypes are still reproduced within the maker movement. Makerspaces still attract considerably more males than females and exhibit a primarily “male” culture, reflected in the interior design of places, or by the language and attitudes of their members. Females in makerspaces, however, often have a background in communications, arts or design, as opposed to the coding or engineering background of the males. Previous research has shown how machines and materials also take on gendered connotations. The “genderisation” of objects refers to an attributed gender-specific use of machines. An example here could be that 3D printing, which is more often used by female makers compared to male members of makerspaces. Our research also identifies promising approaches for tackling the issue of gender imbalance. The maker movement has significant potential to improve gender equality as younger generations bring societal change to makerspaces and break with stereotypes. One of the findings our paper puts forward is the lack of female role models, especially in leading positions. Our data suggest that the maker scene still has to develop a tradition in reflecting questions around gender stereotypes or their role in partly reproducing them. Hence, we argue that the maker community should be more attentive to this issue and should make a concerted effort to become more diverse. Overall, our case research did not reveal any explicit animosity to gender questions; on the contrary, male makers and most maker communities showed great interest in avoiding gender stereotyping. We suggest applying the Bechdel-Test as a simple tool for clarifying gender topics and encouraging self-reflection among makers. Overall, our paper aims to support makerspaces that want to make diversity part of their strategy for future growth.

[1]  J. Schroeder,et al.  Marketing images of gender: A visual analysis , 1998 .

[2]  Stephen Coleman,et al.  The New Media and Democratic Politics , 1999, New Media Soc..

[3]  ニール ガーシェンフェルド,et al.  How to Make Almost Anything : The Digital Fabrication Revolution , 2012 .

[4]  Edward F. McQuarrie,et al.  Focus Groups: Theory and Practice , 1991 .

[5]  W. Faulkner The technology question in feminism: A view from feminist technology studies , 2001 .

[6]  Red Chidgey,et al.  Maker pedagogies, Do-It-Yourself feminism and DIY citizenship , 2014 .

[7]  P. J. Tichenor,et al.  MASS MEDIA FLOW AND DIFFERENTIAL GROWTH IN KNOWLEDGE , 1970 .

[8]  Austin Toombs Enacting Care Through Collaboration in Communities of Makers , 2015, CSCW Companion.

[9]  J. Moisander,et al.  Introduction: theorising gender and gendering theory in marketing and consumer research , 2015 .

[10]  Nick Taylor,et al.  Making Community: The Wider Role of Makerspaces in Public Life , 2016, CHI.

[11]  Karen Stendal,et al.  How do People with Disability Use and Experience Virtual Worlds and ICT: A Literature Review , 2012 .

[12]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  The Proper Care and Feeding of Hackerspaces: Care Ethics and Cultures of Making , 2015, CHI.

[13]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  HCI's Making Agendas , 2017, Found. Trends Hum. Comput. Interact..

[14]  Elisabeth Unterfrauner,et al.  Diversity in FabLabs: Culture, Role Models and the Gendering of Making , 2017, INSCI.

[15]  Massimo Menichinelli,et al.  An Empirically Informed Taxonomy for the Maker Movement , 2016, INSCI.

[16]  Chris Anderson,et al.  Makers: The New Industrial Revolution , 2012 .

[17]  Konstantin Aal,et al.  Sewing interest in E-textiles: analyzing making from a gendered perspective , 2014, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[18]  Caifeng Shan,et al.  Learning local binary patterns for gender classification on real-world face images , 2012, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[19]  K. Schwab The Fourth Industrial Revolution , 2013 .

[20]  David C. Wilson,et al.  Statement Making: A Maker Fashion Show Foregrounding Feminism, Gender, and Transdisciplinarity , 2018, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[21]  Pritee Khanna,et al.  Gender Classification Techniques: A Review , 2012 .

[22]  B. Kerr,et al.  An exploration of women’s engagement in Makerspaces , 2015 .

[23]  J. Freeman The Tyranny of Structurelessness , 2013 .

[24]  J. Pick,et al.  Digital divides in the world and its regions: A spatial and multivariate analysis of technological utilization , 2015 .

[25]  David Green,et al.  Open Design, Inclusivity and the Intersections of Making , 2018, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[26]  Alexandru Tupan,et al.  Triangulation , 1997, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[27]  Jennifer Ann Rode,et al.  Deconstructing sociotechnical identity in maker cultures , 2018, GenderIT.

[28]  Susan Faulkner,et al.  Making Change: Can Ethnographic Research about Women Makers Change the Future of Computing? , 2014 .

[29]  Li Zhen,et al.  Aligning Technology and Market Drivers in an Open Source Standards Testing Program , 2014, Computer.

[30]  Stefanie Wuschitz,et al.  Feminist Hackerspace as a Place of Infrastructure Production , 2018 .

[31]  Silvia Lindtner,et al.  Introduction to This Special Issue on Open Design at the Intersection of Making and Manufacturing , 2019, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[32]  John T. Sherrill Gender, technology, and narratives in DIY instructions , 2017, SIGDOC.

[33]  Daniela Karin Rosner,et al.  Hacking Culture, Not Devices: Access and Recognition in Feminist Hackerspaces , 2015, CSCW.

[34]  J. Rifkin The Zero Marginal Cost Society: The Internet of Things, the Collaborative Commons, and the Eclipse of Capitalism , 2014 .

[35]  D. Dougherty The Maker Movement , 2012, Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization.

[36]  Silvia Lindtner,et al.  The Crafting of DIY Fatherhood , 2017, CSCW.