Advanced characterization and refinement of poly N-butyl cyanoacrylate microbubbles for ultrasound imaging.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Fabian Kiessling | Georg Schmitz | Monica Siepmann | F. Kiessling | G. Schmitz | M. Siepmann | Zhe Liu | Jessica Gätjens | Stanley Fokong | S. Fokong | Zhe Liu | J. Gätjens
[1] Michel Schneider,et al. Characteristics of SonoVue™ , 1999 .
[2] Xiao Zhou,et al. Preparation and evaluation of poly(L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) microbubbles as a contrast agent for myocardial contrast echocardiography. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.
[3] W N McDicken,et al. Nanomechanical probing of microbubbles using the atomic force microscope. , 2007, Ultrasonics.
[4] K. Bjerknes,et al. Preparation of polymeric microbubbles: formulation studies and product characterisation , 1997 .
[5] G. Schmitz,et al. A Statistical Model for the Quantification of Microbubbles in Destructive Imaging , 2010, Investigative radiology.
[6] Nico de Jong,et al. Oil-filled polymer microcapsules for ultrasound-mediated delivery of lipophilic drugs. , 2009, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.
[7] Wolfhard Semmler,et al. Molecular profiling of angiogenesis with targeted ultrasound imaging: early assessment of antiangiogenic therapy effects , 2008, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.
[8] Eckhard Quandt,et al. Specific targeting of ultrasound contrast agent (USCA) for diagnostic application: an in vitro feasibility study based on SAW biosensor. , 2005, Biosensors & bioelectronics.
[9] R Gramiak,et al. Echocardiography of the aortic root. , 1968, Investigative radiology.
[10] F. Kiessling,et al. Functional and molecular ultrasound imaging: concepts and contrast agents. , 2009, Current medicinal chemistry.
[11] M. Stein,et al. Degradation of polybutyl 2-cyanoacrylate microparticles , 1992 .
[12] M. Schirner,et al. The in vitro stability of air-filled polybutylcyanoacrylate microparticles. , 2006, Biomaterials.
[13] Paul A Dayton,et al. Maintaining monodispersity in a microbubble population formed by flow-focusing. , 2008, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.
[14] Paul A. Dayton,et al. Optical observation of lipid- and polymer-shelled ultrasound microbubble contrast agents , 2004 .
[15] P. Dayton,et al. Optical and acoustical observations of the effects of ultrasound on contrast agents , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.
[16] S. Homma,et al. Effect of microbubble size on fundamental mode high frequency ultrasound imaging in mice. , 2010, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[17] L. Hoff,et al. Oscillations of polymeric microbubbles: effect of the encapsulating shell , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[18] E Stride,et al. Preparation of suspensions of phospholipid-coated microbubbles by coaxial electrohydrodynamic atomization , 2009, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.
[19] B. Goldberg,et al. Experimental investigation of contrast microbubble destruction , 2001, 2001 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.01CH37263).
[20] J. Pikkemaat,et al. Preparation of monodisperse polymer particles and capsules by ink-jet printing , 2006 .
[21] Jameel A Feshitan,et al. Microbubble size isolation by differential centrifugation. , 2009, Journal of colloid and interface science.
[22] O. A. Asbjornsen,et al. Size fractionation of gas-filled microspheres by flotation , 1996 .
[23] Paul A Dayton,et al. Tailoring the Size Distribution of Ultrasound Contrast Agents: Possible Method for Improving Sensitivity in Molecular Imaging , 2007, Molecular imaging.
[24] W. Mcdicken,et al. Quantification of microbubble destruction of three fluorocarbon-filled ultrasonic contrast agents. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[25] Zhanwen Xing,et al. The fabrication of novel nanobubble ultrasound contrast agent for potential tumor imaging , 2010, Nanotechnology.
[26] Nico de Jong,et al. High-speed optical observations of contrast agent destruction. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[27] R. Powell,et al. Needle size and injection rate impact microbubble contrast agent population. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[28] M. Schirner,et al. Sensitive Particle Acoustic Quantification (SPAQ): A New Ultrasound-Based Approach for the Quantification of Ultrasound Contrast Media in High Concentrations , 2005, Investigative Radiology.
[29] N. Zaffaroni,et al. Tethering functional ligands onto shell of ultrasound active polymeric microbubbles. , 2006, Biomacromolecules.
[30] S. Delorme,et al. Pharmacodynamics of Streptavidin-Coated Cyanoacrylate Microbubbles Designed for Molecular Ultrasound Imaging , 2008, Investigative radiology.
[31] Eleanor Stride,et al. Generation of microbubbles for diagnostic and therapeutic applications using a novel device. , 2008, Journal of drug targeting.
[32] N. Hosten,et al. Perfusion abnormalities of kidney parenchyma: microvascular imaging with contrast‐enhanced color and power Doppler ultrasonography‐‐preliminary results. , 2000, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.
[33] E. Wisner,et al. The effect of size on the acoustic response of polymer-shelled contrast agents. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.
[34] Michael Reinhardt,et al. Molecular targeting of lymph nodes with L-selectin ligand-specific US contrast agent: a feasibility study in mice and dogs. , 2004, Radiology.