Archival Memory on the Web: Web 2.0 Technologies for Collective Memory

Archives have directly and indirectly served for memory. What is collected in archives, how it is presented to users, and how users understand and use the documents affects how a given society remembers its past. Some archival scholars see that how users interpret documents from their perspectives and by social interests may play a central role in constructing social memory because memories are often triggered by individual and social concerns of the present time. Therefore, knowing what causes users to seek for a certain materials, how they use those materials and why can offer a clue to learn how archives serve for social memory. In the Web space, the interaction between users and archives/archival materials can be easily observed. Beyond making access simple for users and promoting archival documents using Web technology, archives can serve the broader purpose of memory by skillfully exploiting the characteristics of Web 2.0 and digital cultures in a way to observe how users engage in and contribute to archival contents available on the Web. This study examines the discourses on memory in the archival context, and in particular, how archives can serve as platforms for memory within the new environment of Web 2.0 technologies. It surveys discussions on memory in relation to archives, history, and evidence, focusing on the user and use context as it is represented in the archival literature. This paper discusses how that technology provides features that allow us to see collective memory being constructed in the archives, and presents examples of how the Web 2.0 technology can structure the way users share their memories in building a larger narrative around the archive.

[1]  Angelika Menne-Haritz Access — The reformulation of an archival paradigm , 2001 .

[2]  Kate Theimer What Is the Meaning of Archives 2.0 , 2011 .

[3]  J. Meehan The archival nexus: rethinking the interplay of archival ideas about the nature, value, and use of records , 2009 .

[4]  A. Reading Digital interactivity in public memory institutions: the uses of new technologies in Holocaust museums , 2003 .

[5]  Michelle Light,et al.  Colophons and Annotations: New Directions for the Finding Aid , 2007 .

[6]  E. Ketelaar Tacit narratives: The meanings of archives , 2001 .

[7]  Brien Brothman,et al.  The Past That Archives Keep: Memory, History, and the Preservation of Archival Records , 2001 .

[8]  Elizabeth Yakel,et al.  Interaction in Virtual Archives: The Polar Bear Expedition Digital Collections Next Generation Finding Aid , 2008 .

[9]  Geoffrey Yeo ‘Nothing is the same as something else’: significant properties and notions of identity and originality , 2010 .

[10]  Donghee Sinn Room for archives? Use of archival materials in No Gun Ri research , 2010 .

[11]  P. Nora Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire , 1989 .

[12]  Terry Cook,et al.  Archives, records, and power: From (postmodern) theory to (archival) performance , 2002 .

[13]  Geoffrey Yeo Concepts of Record (1) : Evidence, Information, and Persistent Representations , 2008 .

[14]  J. Wallot Building a Living Memory for the History of Our Present: New Perspectives on Archival Appraisal , 1991 .

[15]  Mary E. Samouelian,et al.  Embracing Web 2.0: Archives and the Newest Generation of Web Applications , 2009 .

[16]  Ciaran B. Trace What is recorded is never simply ‘what happened’: Record keeping in modern organizational culture , 2002 .

[17]  J. Bastian Flowers for Homestead: A Case Study in Archives and Collective Memory , 2009 .

[18]  Verne Harris,et al.  The archival sliver: Power, memory, and archives in South Africa , 2002 .

[19]  Terry Cook Archival science and postmodernism: new formulations for old concepts , 2001 .