A dynamical systems approach to gross domestic product forecasting

Models developed for gross domestic product (GDP) growth forecasting tend to be extremely complex, relying on a large number of variables and parameters. Such complexity is not always to the benefit of the accuracy of the forecast. Economic complexity constitutes a framework that builds on methods developed for the study of complex systems to construct approaches that are less demanding than standard macroeconomic ones in terms of data requirements, but whose accuracy remains to be systematically benchmarked. Here we develop a forecasting scheme that is shown to outperform the accuracy of the five-year forecast issued by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) by more than 25% on the available data. The model is based on effectively representing economic growth as a two-dimensional dynamical system, defined by GDP per capita and ‘fitness’, a variable computed using only publicly available product-level export data. We show that forecasting errors produced by the method are generally predictable and are also uncorrelated to IMF errors, suggesting that our method is extracting information that is complementary to standard approaches. We believe that our findings are of a very general nature and we plan to extend our validations on larger datasets in future works.Inspired to methods developed for the study of complex systems, a framework for predicting gross domestic product growth outperforms the accuracy of the five-year forecast of the International Monetary Fund.

[1]  R. Solow A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth , 1956 .

[2]  B. Balassa Trade Liberalisation and “Revealed” Comparative Advantage , 1965 .

[3]  E. Lorenz Atmospheric Predictability as Revealed by Naturally Occurring Analogues , 1969 .

[4]  R. Batchelor How useful are the forecasts of intergovernmental agencies? The IMF and OECD versus the consensus , 2001 .

[5]  A. Dreher,et al.  The political economy of IMF forecasts , 2008 .

[6]  César A. Hidalgo,et al.  The network structure of economic output , 2011, 1101.1707.

[7]  Massimo Cencini,et al.  Predicting the future from the past: An old problem from a modern perspective , 2012, 1210.6758.

[8]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  A New Metrics for Countries' Fitness and Products' Complexity , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[9]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  Measuring the Intangibles: A Metrics for the Economic Complexity of Countries and Products , 2013, PloS one.

[10]  Do private sector forecasters chase after IMF or OECD forecasts , 2013 .

[11]  G. Caldarelli,et al.  Economic complexity: Conceptual grounding of a new metrics for global competitiveness , 2013 .

[12]  Lant Pritchett,et al.  Asiaphoria Meets Regression to the Mean , 2014 .

[13]  Riccardo Di Clemente,et al.  Diversification versus Specialization in Complex Ecosystems , 2014, PloS one.

[14]  L. Pietronero,et al.  How the Taxonomy of Products Drives the Economic Development of Countries , 2014, PloS one.

[15]  Luciano Pietronero,et al.  The Heterogeneous Dynamics of Economic Complexity , 2015, PloS one.

[16]  George Sugihara,et al.  Equation-free mechanistic ecosystem forecasting using empirical dynamic modeling , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Emanuele Pugliese,et al.  On the convergence of the Fitness-Complexity algorithm , 2014, 1410.0249.

[18]  Emanuele Pugliese,et al.  Complex Economies Have a Lateral Escape from the Poverty Trap , 2015, PloS one.

[19]  L. Pietronero,et al.  On the Predictability of Growth , 2017 .

[20]  Cristian S. Calude,et al.  The Deluge of Spurious Correlations in Big Data , 2016, Foundations of Science.