Interim monitoring of clinical trials: Decision theory, dynamic programming and optimal stopping

It is standard practice to monitor clinical trials with a view to stopping early if results are sufficiently compelling. We explain how the properties of stopping boundaries can be calculated numerically and how to optimise boundaries to minimise expected sample size while controlling type I and II error probabilities. Our optimisation method involves the use of dynamic programming to solve Bayes decision problems with no constraint on error rates. This conversion to an unconstrained problem is equivalent to using Lagrange multipliers. Applications of these methods in clinical trial design include the derivation of optimal adaptive designs in which future group sizes are allowed to depend on previously observed responses; designs which test both for superiority and non-inferiority; and group sequential tests which allow for a delay between treatment and response.

[1]  Lisa V. Hampson,et al.  Group sequential tests for delayed responses (with discussion) , 2013 .

[2]  C. Jennison,et al.  Optimal group‐sequential designs for simultaneous testing of superiority and non‐inferiority , 2010, Statistics in medicine.

[3]  Christopher Jennison,et al.  Efficient group sequential designs when there are several effect sizes under consideration , 2006, Statistics in medicine.

[4]  Christopher Jennison,et al.  Adaptive and nonadaptive group sequential tests , 2006 .

[5]  Christopher Jennison,et al.  Optimal asymmetric one‐sided group sequential tests , 2002 .

[6]  Y Tsong,et al.  Group sequential test strategies for superiority and non‐inferiority hypotheses in active controlled clinical trials , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[7]  KyungMann Kim Group Sequential Methods with Applications to Clinical Trials , 2001 .

[8]  Sue-Jane Wang,et al.  Modification of Sample Size in Group Sequential Clinical Trials , 1999, Biometrics.

[9]  Christopher Jennison,et al.  Group Sequential Analysis Incorporating Covariate Information , 1997 .

[10]  James M. Robins,et al.  Semiparametric Efficiency and its Implication on the Design and Analysis of Group-Sequential Studies , 1997 .

[11]  Christopher Jennison,et al.  An improved method for deriving optimal one-sided group sequential tests , 1992 .

[12]  A A Tsiatis,et al.  The impact that group sequential tests would have made on ECOG clinical trials. , 1989, Statistics in medicine.

[13]  D L DeMets,et al.  Statistical aspects of early termination in the beta-blocker heart attack trial. , 1982, Controlled clinical trials.

[14]  P. O'Brien,et al.  A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. , 1979, Biometrics.

[15]  S. Pocock Group sequential methods in the design and analysis of clinical trials , 1977 .

[16]  P. Armitage,et al.  Repeated Significance Tests on Accumulating Data , 1969 .

[17]  Lisa V. Hampson,et al.  Group sequential tests for delayed responses , 2008 .