A dynamic model of long‐range conformational adaptations triggered by nucleotide binding in GroEL‐GroES

The molecular chaperone, GroEL, essential for correct protein folding in E. coli, is composed of 14 identical subunits organized in two interacting rings, each providing a folding chamber for non‐native substrate proteins. The oligomeric assembly shows positive cooperativity within each ring and negative cooperativity between the rings. Although it is well known that ATP and long‐range allosteric interactions drive the functional cycle of GroEL, an atomic resolution view of how ligand binding modulates conformational adaptations over long distances remains a major challenge. Moreover, little is known on the relation between equilibrium dynamics at physiological temperatures and the allosteric transitions in GroEL. Here we present multiple all‐atom molecular dynamics simulations of the GroEL‐GroES assemblies at different stages of the functional cycle. Combined with an extensive analysis of the complete set of experimentally available structures, principal component analysis and conformer plots, we provide an explicit evaluation of the accessible conformational space of unliganded GroEL. Our results suggest the presence of pre‐existing conformers at the equatorial domain level, and a shift of the conformational ensemble upon ATP‐binding. At the inter‐ring interface the simulations capture a remarkable offset motion of helix D triggered by ATP‐binding to the folding active ring. The reorientation of helix D, previously only observed upon GroES association, correlates with a change of the internal dynamics in the opposite ring. This work contributes to the understanding of the molecular mechanisms in GroEL and highlights the ability of all‐atom MD simulations to model long‐range structural changes and allosteric events in large systems. Proteins 2012;. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  J. Wang,et al.  Structural basis for GroEL-assisted protein folding from the crystal structure of (GroEL-KMgATP)14 at 2.0A resolution. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  RosemanAM ChenS FurtakK FentonWA SaibilHR HorwichAL RyeHS GroEL-GroES cycling: ATP and nonnative polypeptide direct alternation of folding-active rings. , 1999 .

[3]  M. Karplus,et al.  Molecular dynamics and protein function. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  M Karplus,et al.  A Dynamic Model for the Allosteric Mechanism of GroEL , 2000 .

[5]  Jimin Wang,et al.  Domain motions in GroEL upon binding of an oligopeptide. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[6]  Charu Chaudhry,et al.  Role of the γ‐phosphate of ATP in triggering protein folding by GroEL–GroES: function, structure and energetics , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[7]  Jianpeng Ma,et al.  The unfolding action of GroEL on a protein substrate. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[8]  W. Delano The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System , 2002 .

[9]  James Andrew McCammon,et al.  Ras Conformational Switching: Simulating Nucleotide-Dependent Conformational Transitions with Accelerated Molecular Dynamics , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[10]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[11]  Zbyszek Otwinowski,et al.  The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonln GroEL at 2.8 Å , 1994, Nature.

[12]  G. A. Frank,et al.  Out-of-equilibrium conformational cycling of GroEL under saturating ATP concentrations , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  D. Case,et al.  Insights into protein-protein binding by binding free energy calculation and free energy decomposition for the Ras-Raf and Ras-RalGDS complexes. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[15]  Bert L. de Groot,et al.  Spontaneous Quaternary and Tertiary T-R Transitions of Human Hemoglobin in Molecular Dynamics Simulation , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[16]  Nathalie Reuter,et al.  Principal component and normal mode analysis of proteins; a quantitative comparison using the GroEL subunit , 2011, Proteins.

[17]  D. Kern,et al.  Dynamic personalities of proteins , 2007, Nature.

[18]  D. J. Naylor,et al.  Proteome-wide Analysis of Chaperonin-Dependent Protein Folding in Escherichia coli , 2005, Cell.

[19]  Yelena R. Sliozberg,et al.  Spontaneous conformational changes in the E. coli GroEL subunit from all-atom molecular dynamics simulations. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[20]  A. Muga,et al.  Salt Bridges at the Inter-ring Interface Regulate the Thermostat of GroEL* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[21]  A. Horovitz,et al.  Dissociation of the GroEL-GroES asymmetric complex is accelerated by increased cooperativity in ATP binding to the GroEL ring distal to GroES. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[22]  Changbong Hyeon,et al.  Dynamics of allosteric transitions in GroEL , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  S. Spinelli,et al.  Crystal structure of the temperature-sensitive and allosteric-defective chaperonin GroELE461K. , 2006, Journal of structural biology.

[24]  G. Montoya,et al.  Chaperonins: two rings for folding. , 2011, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[25]  D. Boisvert,et al.  The 2.4 A crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL complexed with ATP gamma S. , 1996, Nature structural biology.

[26]  Helen R. Saibil,et al.  GroEL-GroES Cycling ATP and Nonnative Polypeptide Direct Alternation of Folding-Active Rings , 1999, Cell.

[27]  N. Reuter,et al.  Dynamics, flexibility and ligand-induced conformational changes in biological macromolecules: a computational approach. , 2011, Future medicinal chemistry.

[28]  J. Berg,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.

[29]  H. Saibil,et al.  Allosteric signaling of ATP hydrolysis in GroEL–GroES complexes , 2006, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[30]  T. Blundell,et al.  Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[31]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Is allostery an intrinsic property of all dynamic proteins? , 2004, Proteins.

[32]  Holger Gohlke,et al.  Converging free energy estimates: MM‐PB(GB)SA studies on the protein–protein complex Ras–Raf , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[33]  Leo S. D. Caves,et al.  Bio3d: An R Package , 2022 .

[34]  Zbyszek Otwinowski,et al.  The 2.4 Å crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL complexed with ATPγS , 1996, Nature Structural Biology.

[35]  Axel T Brunger,et al.  Exploring the structural dynamics of the E.coli chaperonin GroEL using translation-libration-screw crystallographic refinement of intermediate states. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[36]  A. Horwich,et al.  Distinct actions of cis and trans ATP within the double ring of the chaperonin GroEL , 1997, Nature.

[37]  D. Kern,et al.  The role of dynamics in allosteric regulation. , 2003, Current opinion in structural biology.

[38]  Robert B Best,et al.  A mutant chaperonin with rearranged inter-ring electrostatic contacts and temperature-sensitive dissociation , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[39]  R. Nussinov,et al.  The origin of allosteric functional modulation: multiple pre-existing pathways. , 2009, Structure.

[40]  H. Frauenfelder,et al.  Conformational substates in proteins. , 1988, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[41]  D. Case,et al.  Modification of the Generalized Born Model Suitable for Macromolecules , 2000 .

[42]  A. Horovitz,et al.  Nested cooperativity in the ATPase activity of the oligomeric chaperonin GroEL. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[43]  Mark A. Wilson,et al.  Intrinsic motions along an enzymatic reaction trajectory , 2007, Nature.

[44]  Amnon Horovitz,et al.  Mapping the Transition State of the Allosteric Pathway of GroEL by Protein Engineering , 1998 .

[45]  A. Horovitz,et al.  Residue lysine-34 in GroES modulates allosteric transitions in GroEL. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[46]  Arthur L Horwich,et al.  Chaperonin-mediated protein folding: using a central cavity to kinetically assist polypeptide chain folding , 2009, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[47]  A. Horwich,et al.  The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL–GroES–(ADP)7 chaperonin complex , 1997, Nature.

[48]  P. Kollman,et al.  Calculating structures and free energies of complex molecules: combining molecular mechanics and continuum models. , 2000, Accounts of chemical research.

[49]  B. Gowen,et al.  ATP-Bound States of GroEL Captured by Cryo-Electron Microscopy , 2001, Cell.

[50]  A. Fersht,et al.  A structural model for GroEL-polypeptide recognition. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  M Karplus,et al.  The allosteric mechanism of the chaperonin GroEL: a dynamic analysis. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[52]  K. Wüthrich,et al.  GroEL‐GroES‐mediated protein folding , 2006, Chemical reviews.

[53]  K. Teilum,et al.  Functional aspects of protein flexibility , 2009, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[54]  Heather A. Carlson,et al.  Development of polyphosphate parameters for use with the AMBER force field , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[55]  James Andrew McCammon,et al.  Conformational Sampling and Nucleotide-Dependent Transitions of the GroEL Subunit Probed by Unbiased Molecular Dynamics Simulations , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[56]  Wei Zhang,et al.  A point‐charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed‐phase quantum mechanical calculations , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[57]  D. Case,et al.  Exploring protein native states and large‐scale conformational changes with a modified generalized born model , 2004, Proteins.

[58]  S. Takada,et al.  Frustration, specific sequence dependence, and nonlinearity in large-amplitude fluctuations of allosteric proteins , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[59]  Cecilia Bartolucci,et al.  Crystal structure of wild-type chaperonin GroEL. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[60]  Yong Duan,et al.  Distinguish protein decoys by Using a scoring function based on a new AMBER force field, short molecular dynamics simulations, and the generalized born solvent model , 2004, Proteins.