Applying artificial intelligence in the science & technology cycle

The science and technology (S&T) cycle starts with Congress identifying areas that demand scientific advancements. The cycle continues with funding agencies distributing funds to researchers to investigate and advance these areas. These novel advancements are then reported in scholarly publications. Scientific advancements a e ultimately expected to be converted into wealth, promoting economic activity, and benefiting society. It is not, however, guaranteed that the desired advances targeted by Congress are met. Scholarly publications encompass valuable knowledge about many aspects of the S&T cycle and may retain the key to many unanswered questions and support multiple, yet unoffered, services to users. Because of the data deluge, it has become necessary to rely on automated decision-making agents based on artificial intelligence (AI) methods to make decisions. This article introduces AI and proposes to relieve highly-specialized human experts from the position of decision makers and shift them to become managers of automated decision-making agents that can handle the data volume. This article will lay out research directions, technical challenges, and the benefits of applying AI in various steps of the S&T cycle.

[1]  Tsuyoshi Murata,et al.  {m , 1934, ACML.

[2]  G. Huber Managerial decision making , 1980 .

[3]  Geoffrey C. Fox,et al.  Examining the Challenges of Scientific Workflows , 2007, Computer.

[4]  Peter Norvig,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach , 1995 .

[5]  Rosina O. Weber,et al.  Designing Multifunctional Knowledge Management Systems , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[6]  Marina Jirotka,et al.  Supporting Scientific Collaboration: Methods, Tools and Concepts , 2013, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[7]  Andreas Nürnberger,et al.  A comparative study about children's and adults' perception of targeted web search engines , 2014, CHI.

[8]  Dragomir R. Radev,et al.  Generating Extractive Summaries of Scientific Paradigms , 2013, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[9]  Chandra Bhagavatula,et al.  Content-Based Citation Recommendation , 2018, NAACL.

[10]  Benoît Godin,et al.  Measurement and statistics on science and technology : 1920 to the present , 2004 .

[11]  G. Huber Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[12]  Nicolás Robinson-García,et al.  The Google scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicators , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[13]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[14]  Franco Turini,et al.  A Survey of Methods for Explaining Black Box Models , 2018, ACM Comput. Surv..

[15]  P. Glasziou,et al.  Systematic review automation technologies , 2014, Systematic Reviews.

[16]  Erik T. Mueller,et al.  Watson: Beyond Jeopardy! , 2013, Artif. Intell..

[17]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[18]  Bert Carelli,et al.  TrendMD: Using AI to enhance discovery and achieve publisher goals , 2020, Inf. Serv. Use.

[19]  Anne E. Trefethen,et al.  The UK e-Science Core Programme and the Grid , 2002, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[20]  Ming-Wei Chang,et al.  BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding , 2019, NAACL.

[21]  S. Rijcke,et al.  Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics , 2015, Nature.

[22]  M. Baker 1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility , 2016, Nature.

[23]  Manabu Okumura,et al.  Towards Multi-paper Summarization Using Reference Information , 1999, IJCAI.

[24]  Colin Macilwain,et al.  Science economics: What science is really worth , 2010, Nature.

[25]  Michael M. Richter,et al.  Case-Based Reasoning: A Textbook , 2013 .

[26]  Stefano Bertuzzi,et al.  Measuring the Results of Science Investments , 2011, Science.

[27]  Rosina O. Weber,et al.  Investigating Textual Case-Based XAI , 2018, ICCBR.

[28]  J. Savulescu,et al.  The hexamethonium asthma study and the death of a normal volunteer in research , 2002, Journal of medical ethics.

[29]  Amina Adadi,et al.  Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) , 2018, IEEE Access.

[30]  J. Lane Assessing the Impact of Science Funding , 2009, Science.

[31]  Min Song,et al.  Representing Scientific Knowledge , 2017, Springer International Publishing.

[32]  Rosina O. Weber Objectivistic knowledge artifacts , 2018, Data Technol. Appl..

[33]  James H. Moor,et al.  The Dartmouth College Artificial Intelligence Conference: The Next Fifty Years , 2006, AI Mag..

[34]  P. Kearney,et al.  The effect of moderate gestational alcohol consumption during pregnancy on speech and language outcomes in children: a systematic review , 2014, Systematic Reviews.

[35]  William J. Clancey,et al.  Explanation in Human-AI Systems: A Literature Meta-Review, Synopsis of Key Ideas and Publications, and Bibliography for Explainable AI , 2019, ArXiv.

[36]  Stephen H. Koslow,et al.  Should the neuroscience community make a paradigm shift to sharing primary data? , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[37]  Søren Brunak,et al.  A comprehensive and quantitative comparison of text-mining in 15 million full-text articles versus their corresponding abstracts , 2018, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[38]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  ROC Graphs: Notes and Practical Considerations for Researchers , 2007 .

[39]  Konrad P. Körding,et al.  Claim Extraction in Biomedical Publications using Deep Discourse Model and Transfer Learning , 2019, ArXiv.

[40]  Michael M. Richter,et al.  Case-Based Reasoning , 2013, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[41]  Mads Holmen Blockchain and scholarly publishing could be best friends , 2018, Inf. Serv. Use.

[42]  Tim Miller,et al.  Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciences , 2017, Artif. Intell..

[43]  Andrew Thatcher,et al.  Changes in users’ mental models of Web search engines after ten years , 2014 .

[44]  Yiming Yang,et al.  XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understanding , 2019, NeurIPS.