Bridging meta-analysis and the comparative method: a test of seed size effect on germination after frugivores’ gut passage

Most studies using meta-analysis try to establish relationships between traits across taxa from interspecific databases and, thus, the phylogenetic relatedness among these taxa should be taken into account to avoid pseudoreplication derived from common ancestry. This paper illustrates, with a representative example of the relationship between seed size and the effect of frugivore’s gut on seed germination, that meta-analytic procedures can also be phylogenetically corrected by means of the comparative method. The conclusions obtained in the meta-analytical and phylogenetical approaches are very different. The meta-analysis revealed that the positive effects that gut passage had on seed germination increased with seed size in the case of gut passage through birds whereas decreased in the case of gut passage through non-flying mammals. However, once the phylogenetic relatedness among plant species was taken into account, the effects of gut passage on seed germination did not depend on seed size and were similar between birds and non-flying mammals. Some methodological considerations are given to improve the bridge between the meta-analysis and the comparative method.

[1]  J. Gillooly,et al.  Effect of body size and temperature on generation time in zooplankton , 2000 .

[2]  Wesley Rodrigues Silva,et al.  A meta-analysis of the effect of gut treatment on seed germination. , 2002 .

[3]  Martins,et al.  Adaptation and the comparative method. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[4]  M. Westoby,et al.  Seed Size and Phylogeny in Six Temperate Floras: Constraints, Niche Conservatism, and Adaptation , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[5]  Jonathan Silvertown,et al.  PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF TRAIT EVOLUTION AND SPECIES DIVERSITY VARIATION AMONG ANGIOSPERM FAMILIES , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[6]  D. Penny.  The comparative method in evolutionary biology , 1992 .

[7]  George Davey Smith,et al.  Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures , 1997, BMJ.

[8]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  The Interaction between Competition and Predation: A Meta‐analysis of Field Experiments , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[9]  Jessica Gurevitch,et al.  Meta-analysis in ecology , 2001 .

[10]  C. Herrera.  INTERSPECIFIC VARIATION IN FRUIT SHAPE: ALLOMETRY, PHYLOGENY, AND ADAPTATION TO DISPERSAL AGENTS' , 1992 .

[11]  C. Herrera.  VERTEBRATE-DISPERSED PLANTS OF THE IBERIAN PENINSULA: A STUDY OF FRUIT CHARACTERISTICS' , 1987 .

[12]  T. R. Paulsen,et al.  Passage through bird guts increases germination rate and seedling growth in Sorbus aucuparia , 2002 .

[13]  T. Garland,et al.  Polytomies and phylogenetically independent contrasts: examination of the bounded degrees of freedom approach. , 1999, Systematic biology.

[14]  Theodore Garland,et al.  Phylogenetic Analysis of Covariance by Computer Simulation , 1993 .

[15]  J. L. Tomkins,et al.  Meta‐analysis, can it ever fail? , 2002 .

[16]  W. Kress,et al.  Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences , 2000 .

[17]  C. Herrera.  Frugivory and seed dispersal by carnivorous mammals, and associated fruit characteristics, in undisturbed Mediterranean habitatsFrugivory and seed dispersal by carnivorous mammals, and associated fruit characteristics, in undisturbed Mediterranean habitats , 1989 .

[18]  Peter A. Van Zandt,et al.  A Meta‐Analysis of Adaptive Deme Formation in Phytophagous Insect Populations , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[19]  D. Waller,et al.  Do Plant Populations Purge Their Genetic Load? Effects of Population Size and Mating History on Inbreeding Depression , 1999 .

[20]  T. Garland,et al.  Procedures for the Analysis of Comparative Data Using Phylogenetically Independent Contrasts , 1992 .

[21]  R. Thornhill,et al.  A meta‐analysis of the heritability of developmental stability , 1997 .

[22]  P. Reich,et al.  Convergence and correlations among leaf size and function in seed plants: a comparative test using independent contrasts. , 1999, American journal of botany.

[23]  L. Fahrig,et al.  HABITAT LOSS AND POPULATION DECLINE: A META‐ANALYSIS OF THE PATCH SIZE EFFECT , 1998 .

[24]  Mark Pagel,et al.  Statistical analysis of comparative data , 2000 .

[25]  P. Jordano.  Angiosperm Fleshy Fruits and Seed Dispersers: A Comparative Analysis of Adaptation and Constraints in Plant-Animal Interactions , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[26]  A. Dixon,et al.  Developmental Rate Isomorphy in Insects and Mites , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[27]  L. Hedges,et al.  Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis , 1987 .

[28]  AGE AT MATURITY AND DIVERSIFICATION IN WOODY ANGIOSPERMS , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[29]  G. Arnqvist,et al.  The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[30]  G. Arnqvist,et al.  MetaWin: Statistical Software for Meta-Analysis with Resampling Tests. Version 1.Michael S. Rosenberg , Dean C. Adams , Jessica Gurevitch , 1998 .

[31]  E. V. Werf,et al.  Lack's Clutch Size Hypothesis: An Examination of the Evidence Using Meta‐Analysis , 1992 .

[32]  S. Mazer.  Seed mass of Indiana Dune genera and families: Taxonomic and ecological correlates , 1990, Evolutionary Ecology.

[33]  S. Barrett,et al.  A comparative analysis of pollen limitation in flowering plants , 2000 .

[34]  Philip Ineson,et al.  Elevated CO2, litter chemistry, and decomposition: a synthesis , 2001, Oecologia.

[35]  C. Nilsson,et al.  The effects of plant litter on vegetation: a meta‐analysis , 1999 .

[36]  M. Jennions,et al.  Relationships fade with time: a meta-analysis of temporal trends in publication in ecology and evolution , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  D. Levey,et al.  Evolutionary Implications of Fruit-Processing Limitations in Cedar Waxwings , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[38]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Male parental care, differential parental investment by females and sexual selection , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[39]  D. Ackerly.  TAXON SAMPLING, CORRELATED EVOLUTION, AND INDEPENDENT CONTRASTS , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[40]  T. F. Hansen,et al.  Phylogenies and the Comparative Method: A General Approach to Incorporating Phylogenetic Information into the Analysis of Interspecific Data , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[41]  Robert Poulin,et al.  Variation in the intraspecific relationship between fish length and intensity of parasitic infection: biological and statistical causes. , 2000 .