Measuring Organizational Performance: A Case for Subjective Measures

We review the organizational performance (OP) measurement literature highlighting the limitations of both objective and subjective measures of performance. We argue that, with careful planning, subjective measures can be successfully employed to assess OP. This is because often consistent, reliable and comparable compatible objective data on OP measures – particularly across countries and sectors – is difficult to come by. Considering that an inflated OP measure can be cross‐checked with the use of secondary data, managers have little incentive to report such figures. As a result, when quizzed over the stand‐alone performance measures of their organizations or vis‐a‐vis their rivals, managers accurately assess and respond to questions on the performance of their organizations. An in‐depth statistical exercise conducted on the subjective measures of OP as reported by managers of four sets of companies in four separate countries, show consistent results, thus lending support to this premise.

[1]  M. Porter,et al.  HOW MUCH DOES INDUSTRY MATTER , REALLY ? , 1997 .

[2]  J. Pfeffer.  Seven Practices of Successful Organizations , 1998 .

[3]  Tamer K. Darwish,et al.  A comparative study of performance appraisals, incentives and rewards practices in domestic and multinational enterprises in the country of Brunei Darussalam , 2013 .

[4]  Abdelwahab Ait Razouk,et al.  High-performance work systems and performance of French small- and medium-sized enterprises: examining causal order , 2011 .

[5]  G. Glass,et al.  Consequences of Failure to Meet Assumptions Underlying the Fixed Effects Analyses of Variance and Covariance , 1972 .

[6]  Tamer K. Darwish,et al.  An analysis of recruitment, training and retention practices in domestic and multinational enterprises in the country of Brunei Darussalam , 2013 .

[7]  R. Kaplan,et al.  The balanced scorecard--measures that drive performance. , 2015, Harvard business review.

[8]  Yadong Luo.  Political behavior, social responsibility, and perceived corruption: a structuration perspective , 2006 .

[9]  T. Wall,et al.  On the validity of subjective measures of company performance , 2004 .

[10]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  Tamer K. Darwish,et al.  The Impact of Human Resource Practices on Actual and Perceived Organizational Performance in a Middle Eastern Emerging Market , 2016 .

[12]  John E. Delery,et al.  Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions , 1996 .

[13]  R. Croucher,et al.  Human resource management and performance in European firms , 2008 .

[14]  Jeffery S. McMullen,et al.  Capital Is Not Enough: Innovation in Developing Economies , 2012 .

[15]  R. Rumelt.  How much does industry matter , 1991 .

[16]  Zhiang Lin,et al.  Understanding Collaboration Outcomes From an Extended Resource-Based View Perspective: The Roles of Organizational Characteristics, Partner Attributes, and Network Structures† , 2007 .

[17]  Tamer K. Darwish,et al.  The role of strategic HR practices in organisational effectiveness: an empirical investigation in the country of Jordan , 2013 .

[18]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Knowledge Exchange and Combination: The Role of Human Resource Practices in the Performance of High-Technology Firms , 2006 .

[19]  D. Guest.  Human resource management and performance: still searching for some answers , 2011 .

[20]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Measurement of Business Economic Performance: An Examination of Method Convergence , 1987 .

[21]  A. Pavlovskaya,et al.  The effect of human resource management practices on firm performance in Russia , 2000 .

[22]  Tamer K. Darwish,et al.  Does strategic human resource involvement and devolvement enhance organisational performance? : Evidence from Jordan , 2013 .

[23]  E. Parry,et al.  The impact of bundles of strategic human resource management practices on the performance of European firms , 2008 .

[24]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit , 1984 .

[25]  J. M. Geringer,et al.  Measuring Performance of International Joint Ventures , 1991 .

[26]  Christian Homburg,et al.  Marketing Performance Measurement Systems: Does Comprehensiveness Really Improve Performance? , 2012 .

[27]  J. Roldán,et al.  From Entrepreneurial Orientation and Learning Orientation to Business Performance: Analysing the Mediating Role of Organizational Learning and the Moderating Effects of Organizational Size , 2014 .

[28]  Richard J. Arend.  SME–supplier alliance activity in manufacturing: contingent benefits and perceptions , 2006 .

[29]  M. Fottler,et al.  Measuring organizational performance in the hospital industry: an exploratory comparison of objective and subjective methods , 2001, Health services management research.

[30]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It To Performance , 1996 .

[31]  Mark A. Huselid.  The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance , 1995 .

[32]  James G. March,et al.  Crossroads---Organizational Performance as a Dependent Variable , 1997 .

[33]  Pawan S. Budhwar,et al.  When in Rome …?: Human resource management and the performance of foreign firms operating in India , 2007 .

[34]  Ashok Jashapara.  Cognition, Culture and Competition: An Empirical Test of the Learning Organization. , 2003 .

[35]  S. Snell,et al.  Human Resource Management and Firm Performance: Testing a Contingency Model of Executive Controls , 1995 .

[36]  R. Wilcox.  Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing , 1997 .

[37]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[38]  Umit Bititci,et al.  Performance Measurement: Challenges for Tomorrow , 2012 .

[39]  Julia Kastner,et al.  Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing , 2005 .

[40]  J. Froud,et al.  Financialization and Strategy: Narrative and Numbers , 2006 .

[41]  B. Cooper,et al.  Evaluation of a perceived organisational performance scale using Rasch model analysis , 2012 .

[42]  Joseph E. Coombs,et al.  Stakeholder management as a predictor of CEO compensation: main effects and interactions with financial performance , 2005 .

[43]  C. Collins,et al.  STRATEGIC HUMAN RESOURCE PRACTICES, TOP MANAGEMENT TEAM SOCIAL NETWORKS, AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: THE ROLE OF HUMAN RESOURCE PRACTICES IN CREATING ORGANIZATIONAL COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE , 2003 .

[44]  Tamer K. Darwish,et al.  Strategic intent, high-performance HRM, and the role of the HR director: an investigation into attitudes and practices in the country of Jordan , 2012 .

[45]  David J. Ketchen,et al.  An assessment of the measurement of performance in international business research , 2008 .

[46]  Satwinder Singh,et al.  Knowledge transfer, controls, and performance of MNE subsidiaries in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia , 2013 .

[47]  Richard L. Priem,et al.  Immigrant Entrepreneurs, the Ethnic Enclave Strategy, and Venture Performance , 2011 .

[48]  Timothy M. Gardner,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HR PRACTICES AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: EXAMINING CAUSAL ORDER , 2005 .

[49]  Marc J. Dollinger,et al.  Interorganizational and Collective Strategies in Small Firms: Environmental Effects and Performance , 1992 .

[50]  Neil Anderson,et al.  Measuring HRM and organisational performance: concepts, issues, and framework , 2012 .

[51]  David J. Flanagan,et al.  The Effect of Layoffs on Firm Reputation , 2005 .

[52]  R. Schroeder,et al.  The impact of human resource management practices on operational performance: recognizing country and industry differences , 2003 .

[53]  L. Kyrgidou,et al.  Drivers and Performance Outcomes of Innovativeness: An Empirical Study , 2013 .

[54]  D. Borst,et al.  Human resource management. , 2001, Occupational medicine.

[55]  Roberto Luna-Arocas,et al.  A Matter of Learning: How Human Resources Affect Organizational Performance , 2010 .

[56]  Laurence J. O'Toole,et al.  Subjective Organizational Performance and Measurement Error: Common Source Bias and Spurious Relationships , 2013 .

[57]  Pierre J. Richard,et al.  Measuring Organizational Performance: Towards Methodological Best Practice , 2009 .

[58]  Toby D. Wall,et al.  The romance of human resource management and business performance, and the case for big science , 2005 .

[59]  W. Kruskal,et al.  Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis , 1952 .

[60]  T. C. Powell.  Organizational alignment as competitive advantage , 1992 .

[61]  Patrick M. Wright,et al.  The impact of HR practices on the performance of business units , 2003 .

[62]  J. March,et al.  Organizational Performance as a Dependent Variable , 2016 .

[63]  J. Paauwe,et al.  HRM and performance: What's next? , 2005 .

[64]  J. Froud,et al.  Financialization at Work: Key Texts and Commentary , 2008 .

[65]  S. Tzafrir.  The relationship between trust, HRM practices and firm performance , 2005 .

[66]  J. Hulland,et al.  Managing An Organizational Learning System By Aligning Stocks and Flows , 2002 .

[67]  H. Bruch,et al.  Organizational Performance Consequences of Age Diversity: Inspecting the Role of Diversity‐Friendly HR Policies and Top Managers’ Negative Age Stereotypes , 2013 .

[68]  L. Harris.  Market Orientation and Performance: Objective and Subjective Empirical Evidence from UK Companies , 2001 .