Neural capacity limits during unconscious semantic processing

A growing body of neuroimaging data suggests that direct measurements of brain activity can reveal subliminal effects that remain invisible with behavior measures alone. We examined whether sentence comprehension processes could be triggered by a sequence of masked words. On each trial, participants viewed a rapid sequence of masked or unmasked words, including a subject noun, three adverbs and followed by a visible target verb. To probe the capacity limits of unconscious processing, we measured event‐related potentials associated with the semantic congruency between the noun and the verb, while varying the subject position in each sentence. Unmasked sentences produced significant behavioral effects of congruency, paralleled by robust N400 effects, independently of subject–verb distance. By contrast, masked sentences produced no behavioral effect and elicited N400 effects only when subjects and verbs were separated by 0 or 1 word. The present results suggest that semantic integration of multiple words can occur unconsciously only if the distance between the words to be integrated does not exceed two words. Although the possibility remains that even longer sequence of invisible words may produce similar neural effects in different experimental settings, our ERP data show that only conscious perception gives access to a buffer that enables robust sentence‐level processing independently of temporal distance.

[1]  Helen J. Neville,et al.  The Role of Awareness in Semantic and Syntactic Processing: An ERP Attentional Blink Study , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  So Much to Read, So Little Time , 2016, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[3]  Kevin J. Miller,et al.  Unconscious neural processing differs with method used to render stimuli invisible , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[4]  T. Busey,et al.  Age-related changes in visual temporal order judgment performance: Relation to sensory and cognitive capacities , 2010, Vision Research.

[5]  Andreas Kleinschmidt,et al.  The Attentional Blink Modulates Activity in the Early Visual Cortex , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Neural Correlates of Subliminal Language Processing , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[7]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Converging Intracranial Markers of Conscious Access , 2009, PLoS biology.

[8]  C. Owsley Aging and vision , 2011, Vision Research.

[9]  Nir Levy,et al.  Reading and doing arithmetic nonconsciously , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  C. Petten,et al.  Neural localization of semantic context effects in electromagnetic and hemodynamic studies , 2006, Brain and Language.

[11]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Levels of processing during non-conscious perception: a critical review of visual masking , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  Pierluigi Zoccolotti,et al.  Perceptual and Cognitive Factors Imposing “Speed Limits” on Reading Rate: A Study with the Rapid Serial Visual Presentation , 2016, PloS one.

[13]  S. C. Draine Analytic limitations of unconscious language processing , 1997 .

[14]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: basic evidence and a workspace framework , 2001, Cognition.

[15]  Helen J. Neville,et al.  The Human Brain Processes Syntax in the Absence of Conscious Awareness , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Direct Intracranial, fMRI, and Lesion Evidence for the Causal Role of Left Inferotemporal Cortex in Reading , 2006, Neuron.

[17]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  A Temporal Bottleneck in the Language Comprehension Network , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Stephen R Mitroff,et al.  Age-related decline of visual processing components in change detection. , 2010, Psychology and aging.

[19]  P. Casado,et al.  Automaticity of higher cognitive functions: Neurophysiological evidence for unconscious syntactic processing of masked words , 2014, Biological Psychology.

[20]  Ross Cunnington,et al.  Attenuation of Neural Responses in Primary Visual Cortex during the Attentional Blink , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  Thierry Baccino,et al.  Rapid serial visual presentation in reading: The case of Spritz , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[22]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? . , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[24]  Hugh Rabagliati,et al.  The Importance of Awareness for Understanding Language , 2018, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[25]  R. Marois,et al.  Capacity limits of information processing in the brain , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  G. Hesselmann,et al.  A critical reexamination of doing arithmetic nonconsciously , 2018, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[27]  Ronald P. Carver,et al.  Reading Rate: Theory, Research, and Practical Implications. , 1992 .

[28]  Julia D. I. Meuwese,et al.  Can the meaning of multiple words be integrated unconsciously? , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  Reappraising the relationship between working memory and conscious awareness , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  Riitta Salmelin,et al.  Localization of Syntactic and Semantic Brain Responses using Magnetoencephalography , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  The role of temporal predictability in semantic expectation: An MEG investigation , 2015, Cortex.

[32]  P. Holcomb Semantic priming and stimulus degradation: implications for the role of the N400 in language processing. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[33]  Markus Siegel,et al.  Neural substrates of cognitive capacity limitations , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Helen L Jamison,et al.  Morphology and the internal structure of words. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  Manuel Martín-Loeches,et al.  Subliminal Emotional Words Impact Syntactic Processing: Evidence from Performance and Event-Related Brain Potentials , 2017, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[36]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[37]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  So that's what you meant! Event-related potentials reveal multiple aspects of context use during construction of message-level meaning , 2012, NeuroImage.

[38]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Beyond the sentence given , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Cortical representation of the constituent structure of sentences , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  Alfred Anwander,et al.  Segregating the core computational faculty of human language from working memory , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  C. Van Petten,et al.  Prediction during language comprehension: benefits, costs, and ERP components. , 2012, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[42]  J. Changeux,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.10 No.5 May 2006 Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomy , 2022 .

[43]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Journal Section: Behavior/systems/cognitive Title: Semantic Analysis Does Not Occur in the Absence of Awareness Induced by Interocular Suppression Abbreviated Title: No Semantic Processing during Interocular Suppression , 2022 .

[44]  A. Lansner,et al.  Neurocognitive Architecture of Working Memory , 2015, Neuron.

[45]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  About Edible Restaurants: Conflicts between Syntax and Semantics as Revealed by ERPs , 2010, Front. Psychology.