The spatial organization of the population density in cities

Although the average population density of a city is an extremely simple indicator, it is often used as a determinant factor for describing various aspects of urban phenomena. On the other hand, a plethora of different measures that aim at characterizing the urban form have been introduced in the literature, often with the risk of redundancy. Here, we argue that two measures are enough to capture a wealth of different forms of the population density. First, fluctuations of the local density can be very important and we should distinguish almost homogeneous cities from highly heterogeneous ones. This is easily characterized by an indicator such as the Gini coefficient $G$, or equivalently by the relative standard deviation or the entropy. The second important dimension is the spatial organization of the heterogeneities in population density. We propose a dispersion index $\eta$ that characterizes the degree of localization of highly populated areas. As far as population density is concerned, we argue that these two dimensions are enough to characterize the spatial organization of cities. We discuss this approach using a dataset of about 4, 500 cities belonging to the 10 largest urban areas in France, for which we have high resolution data, at the level of a square grid of 200 × 200 meters. Representing cities in the plane ($G$, $\eta$) allows us to construct families of cities. We find that, on average, compactness increases with heterogeneity. More precisely, we find four large categories of cities (with population larger than 10, 000 inhabitants): (i) first, homogeneous and dispersed cities where the density fluctuations are small, (ii) very heterogeneous cities with a compact organization of large densities areas. The last two groups comprise heterogeneous cities with (iii) a monocentric organization or (iv) a more delocalized, polycentric structure. We believe that integrating these two parameters in econometric analysis could improve our understanding of the impact of urban form on various socio-economical aspects.

[1]  P. Moran Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. , 1950, Biometrika.

[2]  W. Alonso Location And Land Use , 1964 .

[3]  D. Defays,et al.  An Efficient Algorithm for a Complete Link Method , 1977, Comput. J..

[4]  Philip M. Dixon,et al.  Bootstrapping the gini coefficient of inequality , 1987 .

[5]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[6]  A. Venables,et al.  The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade , 1999 .

[7]  A. Venables,et al.  The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and International Trade , 2000 .

[8]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2003, Technometrics.

[9]  M. Batty,et al.  Representing multifunctional cities: density and diversity in space and time , 2004 .

[10]  Alain Bertaud The Spatial Organization of Cities: Deliberate Outcome or Unforeseen Consequence? , 2004 .

[11]  Yu-hsin Tsai Quantifying Urban Form: Compactness versus 'Sprawl' , 2005 .

[12]  Xixi Lu,et al.  A global comparative analysis of urban form: Applying spatial metrics and remote sensing , 2007 .

[13]  Denise Pumain,et al.  Built-Up Encroachment and the Urban Field: A Comparison of Forty European Cities , 2008 .

[14]  Florence Puech,et al.  Measures of the geographic concentration of industries: improving distance-based methods , 2010 .

[15]  Nina Schwarz Urban form revisited—Selecting indicators for characterising European cities , 2010 .

[16]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Multidimensional urban sprawl in Europe: A self-organizing map approach , 2011, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[17]  M. Batty The New Science of Cities , 2013 .

[18]  M. Barthelemy,et al.  Modeling the polycentric transition of cities. , 2013, Physical review letters.

[19]  Lígia Torres Silva,et al.  Urban form indicators as proxy on the noise exposure of buildings , 2014 .

[20]  M. Barthelemy,et al.  How congestion shapes cities: from mobility patterns to scaling , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[21]  M. Barthelemy,et al.  From mobile phone data to the spatial structure of cities , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[22]  Chuanglin Fang,et al.  Changing urban forms and carbon dioxide emissions in China: A case study of 30 provincial capital cities , 2015 .

[23]  L. Salvati,et al.  Scattered or polycentric? Untangling urban growth in three southern European metropolitan regions through exploratory spatial data analysis , 2016 .

[24]  Yong Liu,et al.  Research on the relationship between urban form and urban smog in China , 2017 .

[25]  J. M. Sobstyl,et al.  Role of City Texture in Urban Heat Islands at Nighttime. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[26]  Yingcheng Li,et al.  How did urban polycentricity and dispersion affect economic productivity? A case study of 306 Chinese cities , 2018 .