Undergraduate Students\u2019 Academic Achievement, Field Dependent/Independent Cognitive Styles and Attitude toward Computers

This paper reports an investigation of cognitive styles, achievement scores and attitudes toward computers among university students. Field dependence/field independence is a dimension of cognitive style that has been researched with various student groups as well as with attitudes. Nevertheless, there appears to be a dearth of published research in this area relevant to teacher trainees in an international setting. In this study, the standardised Group Embedded Figures Test was used to assess field dependency among 130 teacher trainees. Overall, it was found that there was no significant relationship between cognitive styles and academic achievement (r= .14, p= .15); cognitive styles and attitudes toward computers (r = .01, p= .84); and, cognitive styles and attitudes toward computers when their academic achievement scores were covariated (F(2,126) = .40, p > .05). The findings indicate that students’ attitudes toward computers are not associated with field dependency, even when their achievement levels were controlled. Attitude toward computers is found to function independently from cognitive styles.

[1]  Relationship of Field Dependence and Color Coding to Female Students' Achievement , 2001, Perceptual and motor skills.

[2]  Scores on the Group Embedded Figures Test by Undergraduates in Information Management , 1997, Perceptual and motor skills.

[3]  Harold Lee Daniels,et al.  Interaction of Cognitive Style and Learner Control of Presentation Mode in a Hypermedia Environment , 1996 .

[4]  Richard J. Riding,et al.  The Effect of Cognitive Style and Cognitive Skills on School Subject Performance , 1997 .

[5]  R. Abouserie,et al.  Cognitive Style, Gender, Attitude toward Computer‐assisted Learning and Academic Achievement , 1992 .

[6]  S. Messick.  The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promise in educational practice , 1984 .

[7]  C. Tinajero,et al.  Field dependence‐independence and academic achievement: a re‐examination of their relationship , 1997 .

[8]  Lynna J. Ausburn,et al.  Cognitive styles: Some information and implications for instructional design , 1978 .

[9]  Hesham Alomyan,et al.  Exploration of Instructional Strategies and Individual Difference within the Context of Web-Based Learning. , 2004 .

[10]  H. A. Witkin.  A Manual for the embedded figures tests , 1971 .

[11]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  Developing an Internet Attitude Scale for high school students , 2001, Comput. Educ..

[12]  Sang M. Lee,et al.  An Empirical Study of the Relationships among End-User Information Systems Acceptance, Training, and Effectiveness , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Francis M. Dwyer,et al.  The effect of colour coding and test type (visual/verbal) on students identified as possessing different field dependence levels , 1994, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[14]  Mehtap Cakan.  Interaction Between Cognitive Styles and Assessment Approaches. , 2000 .

[15]  David Steele,et al.  Learning style influences student examination performance. , 1998, American journal of surgery.

[16]  Clarice P. Gressard,et al.  Reliability and Factorial Validity of Computer Attitude Scales , 1984 .

[17]  Edward E. Cureton,et al.  The upper and lower twenty-seven per cent rule , 1957 .

[18]  C. A. Moore,et al.  FIELD‐DEPENDENT AND FIELD‐INDEPENDENT COGNITIVE STYLES AND THEIR EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATIONS , 1975 .

[19]  H. Eysenck.  Cognitive styles: Essence and origins: Herman A. Witkin and Donald R. Goodenough International Universities Press, New York (1981). 141 pp. , 1982 .

[20]  W. Paul Jones,et al.  Computer Use and Cognitive Style , 1994 .

[21]  C. Marmar.  Conitive Styles: Essence and Origins , 1982 .

[22]  Jennifer Summerville,et al.  The Role of Awareness of Cognitive Style in Hypermedia. , 1998 .

[23]  Mehtap Cakan.  Psychometric Data on the Group Embedded Figures Test for Turkish Undergraduate Students , 2003, Perceptual and motor skills.