Mobile communication and social capital: an analysis of geographically differentiated usage patterns

Drawing from a representative sample of adults in the USA, this study explored the links between mobile communication and select indicators of social capital, while also accounting for usage patterns regarding the proximity of mobile contact. Overall, the findings show that mobile phone use intersects with proximity in distinctive ways that are related to spending leisure time with others in a face-to-face context and being active in organized groups and clubs. For individuals with primarily local usage patterns, both voice calling and text messaging were positively associated with social leisure activity. For those who primarily used the mobile phone to contact others from a distance, text messaging was positively related to social leisure activity, and for those whose mobile contacts were balanced between local and distant, voice calling was positively associated with active membership in organizations. Interpretation of these findings and directions for future research are offered in the discussion.

[1]  K. Miller,et al.  Magic in the Air , 2001 .

[2]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[3]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Community Integration, Local Media Use, and Democratic Processes , 1996 .

[4]  Scott W. Campbell,et al.  Mobile Communication and Civic Life: Linking Patterns of Use to Civic and Political Engagement , 2010 .

[5]  L. Cronbach.  Statistical tests for moderator variables: flaws in analyses recently proposed , 1987 .

[6]  Mary Gaver.  Magic in the air , 1962 .

[7]  Scott Campbell.  Mobile Technology and the Body: Apparatgeist, Fashion, and Function , 2008 .

[8]  Daisuke Okabe,et al.  Technosocial Situations: Emergent Structuring of Mobile E-mail Use , 2003 .

[9]  W. Rahn,et al.  Individual-Level Evidence for the Causes and Consequences of Social Capital , 1997 .

[10]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  "Connecting" and "Disconnecting" With Civic Life: Patterns of Internet Use and the Production of Social Capital , 2001 .

[11]  R. Putnam.  Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital , 1995, The City Reader.

[12]  Brian G. Southwell,et al.  The Effects of News and Entertainment on Interpersonal Trust: Political TalkRadio, Newspapers, and Television , 2003 .

[13]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Internet Paradox Revisited , 2002 .

[14]  Keith N. Hampton,et al.  Long Distance Community in the Network Society , 2001 .

[15]  Pippa Norris.  Does television erode social capital , 1996 .

[16]  R. Putnam.  The Prosperous Community: Social Capital and Public Life , 1993 .

[17]  Richard Ling.  New Tech, New Ties: How Mobile Communication Is Reshaping Social Cohesion , 2008 .

[18]  NAEWON KANG,et al.  A Multilevel Approach to Civic Participation , 2003, Commun. Res..

[19]  Dhavan V. Shah.  Civic Engagement, Interpersonal Trust, and Television Use: An Individual-Level Assessment of Social Capital , 1998 .

[20]  James E. Katz,et al.  Mobile Phones as Fashion Statements: The Co-creation of Mobile Communication’s Public Meaning , 2005 .

[21]  James E. Katz,et al.  Mobile phones as fashion statements: evidence from student surveys in the US and Japan , 2006, New Media Soc..

[22]  Richard Ling,et al.  Hyper-coordination via mobile phones in Norway , 2002 .

[23]  P. Norris.  Does Television Erode Social Capital? A Reply to Putnam , 1996, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[24]  Mira Sotirovic, Jack M. McLeod.  Values, Communication Behavior, and Political Participation , 2001 .

[25]  Anandam P. Kavoori,et al.  Mobile Communication and Society: A Global Perspective , 2009 .

[26]  Barry Wellman,et al.  The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[27]  Kenichi Ishii.  Implications of Mobility: The Uses of Personal Communication Media in Everyday Life , 2006 .

[28]  J. Michael Brick,et al.  A Minimally Intrusive Method for Sampling Persons in Random Digit Dial Surveys , 2004 .

[29]  Christopher J. Anderson,et al.  Political Action and Social Integration , 1996 .

[30]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Organizational Colleagues, Media Richness, and Electronic Mail , 1991 .

[31]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? , 1998, The American psychologist.

[32]  D. Hindman.  The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier , 1996 .

[33]  Keith N. Hampton.  LIVING THE WIRED LIFE IN THE WIRED SUBURB: NETVILLE, GLOCALIZATION AND CIVIL SOCIETY , 2001 .

[34]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  Connecting, Trusting, and Participating: The Direct and Interactive Effects of Social Associations , 2004 .

[35]  Henry E. Brady,et al.  Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics , 1996 .

[36]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  Communication, Context, and Community , 2001, Commun. Res..

[37]  Gerard Delanty.  The Foundations of Social Theory , 2009 .

[38]  Barry Wellman,et al.  Little Boxes, Glocalization, and Networked Individualism , 2001, Digital Cities.

[39]  Keith N. Hampton,et al.  The not so Global Village of Netville , 2008 .

[40]  Bruce Bimber,et al.  The Internet and Political Transformation: Populism, Community, and Accelerated Pluralism , 1998, Polity.

[41]  James E. Katz,et al.  A nation of strangers? , 1997, CACM.

[42]  C. Coulton,et al.  Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression , 1993 .

[43]  Robert D. Putnam,et al.  Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community , 2000, CSCW '00.

[44]  K. Gergen.  Mobile Communication and the Transformation of the Democratic Process , 2008 .

[45]  M. Castells.  The rise of the network society , 1996 .

[46]  J. Besley.  The Role of Entertainment Television and Its Interactions with Individual Values in Explaining Political Participation , 2006 .

[47]  N. Nie,et al.  Internet and society: a preliminary report , 2001 .

[48]  Noelle Chesley.  Blurring Boundaries? Linking Technology Use, Spillover, Individual Distress, and Family Satisfaction , 2005 .

[49]  Tracy Callaway Russo,et al.  The cocial construction of mobile telephony: an application of the social influence model to perceptions and uses of mobile phones within personal communication networks , 2003 .

[50]  R. Daft,et al.  Information Richness. A New Approach to Managerial Behavior and Organization Design , 1983 .

[51]  Claire Lobet-Maris.  Mobile phone tribes: Youth and social identity , 2003 .

[52]  M. Jennings,et al.  Internet Use and Civic Engagement: A Longitudinal Analysis , 2003 .

[53]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Community, Communication, and Participation: The Role of Mass Media and Interpersonal Discussion in Local Political Participation , 1999 .