Willingness to Pay and Competition in Online Auctions

The authors model how to measure consumer willingness to pay (WTP) using an English, or ascending first-price, auction based on two general bidding premises: No bidder bids more than his or her WTP, and no bidder allows a rival bidder to win at a price that he or she is willing to beat. In other words, the authors propose a “no-regret” rule in bidding. They impose no other restrictive assumptions on “maximands” or the bidders' behaviors in a competitive auction context. The authors model WTP as having two components: a pure product feature component and one based on the auction market environment. The latter includes bidder experience, seller reputation, and measures for competition among bidders and items. The proposed model is general enough to include a “buy-it-now” (equivalent to a posted price) auction mechanism. The authors use data on notebook auctions from one of the largest Internet auction sites in Korea. They find that most product characteristics matter in the expected ways. There are two additional primary findings: First, WTP declines as more similar items are concurrently listed with the focal item; there is an additional effect if these similar items also belong to the same brand. Therefore, market thickness matters for consumer WTP. Second, more extensive site surfing and bidding histories lead to lower WTP, implying that search costs and experience matter in bidding. As specific substantive benefits, the authors demonstrate how sellers can calculate changes in WTP and, thus, the expected revenue as the number of concurrently available similar items varies.

[1]  René Kirkegaard,et al.  Buy‐out prices in auctions: seller competition and multi‐unit demands , 2008 .

[2]  K. Srinivasan,et al.  When auction meets fixed price: a theoretical and empirical examination of buy-it-now auctions , 2008 .

[3]  Young-Hoon Park,et al.  Bayesian Estimation of Bid Sequences in Internet Auctions Using a Generalized Record Breaking Model , 2007 .

[4]  P. Yin,et al.  Information Dispersion and Auction Prices , 2006 .

[5]  Tong Li,et al.  Econometrics of first-price auctions with entry and binding reservation prices , 2005 .

[6]  Peter T. L. Popkowski Leszczyc,et al.  The signal effect of buy-now price in internet auctions , 2005 .

[7]  M. Dewally,et al.  Reputation, Certification, Warranties, and Information as Remedies for Seller-Buyer Information Asymmetries: Lessons from the On-Line Comic Book Market , 2006 .

[8]  Leonardo Rezende,et al.  Auction econometrics by least squares , 2004 .

[9]  Ali Hortaçsu,et al.  Economic Insights from Internet Auctions , 2004 .

[10]  Michael A. Kamins,et al.  Effects of Seller-Supplied Prices on Buyers' Product Evaluations: Reference Prices in an Internet Auction Context , 2004 .

[11]  Han Hong,et al.  Econometric models of asymmetric ascending auctions , 2003 .

[12]  Philip A. Haile,et al.  Inference with an Incomplete Model of English Auctions , 2000, Journal of Political Economy.

[13]  D. Ariely,et al.  Buying, Bidding, Playing, or Competing? Value Assessment and Decision Dynamics in Online Auctions , 2003 .

[14]  M. Melnik,et al.  Does a Seller's Ecommerce Reputation Matter? Evidence from Ebay Auctions , 2003 .

[15]  Alvin E. Roth,et al.  An Experimental Analysis of Ending Rules in Internet Auctions , 2003 .

[16]  Ginger Zhe Jin,et al.  Blind Trust Online: Experimental Evidence from Baseball Cards , 2002 .

[17]  John A. List,et al.  BIDDING BEHAVIOR AND DECISION COSTS IN FIELD EXPERIMENTS , 2002 .

[18]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Evidence of the Effect of Trust Building Technology in Electronic Markets: Price Premiums and Buyer Behavior , 2002, MIS Q..

[19]  A. Roth,et al.  Last-Minute Bidding and the Rules for Ending Second-Price Auctions: Evidence from eBay and Amazon Auctions on the Internet , 2002 .

[20]  Atanu R. Sinha,et al.  Auctions: Research Opportunities in Marketing , 2002 .

[21]  Paul Resnick,et al.  The value of reputation on eBay: A controlled experiment , 2002 .

[22]  J. Wooders,et al.  Reputation in Auctions: Theory, and Evidence from Ebay , 2006 .

[23]  Martin Pesendorfer,et al.  Estimation of a Dynamic Auction Game , 2001 .

[24]  U. Dholakia,et al.  Coveted or Overlooked? The Psychology of Bidding for Comparable Listings in Digital Auctions , 2001 .

[25]  Ali Hortaçsu,et al.  Winner's Curse, Reserve Prices and Endogenous Entry: Empirical Insights from Ebay Auctions , 2003 .

[26]  Ronald T. Wilcox Experts and Amateurs: The Role of Experience in Internet Auctions , 2000 .

[27]  P M Todd,et al.  Précis of Simple heuristics that make us smart , 2000, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[28]  David H. Reiley,et al.  Pennies from Ebay: The Determinants of Price in Online Auctions , 2000 .

[29]  Susan Athey,et al.  Identification of Standard Auction Models , 2000 .

[30]  Q. Vuong,et al.  Optimal Nonparametric Estimation of First-price Auctions , 2000 .

[31]  H. Mendelson,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue on the Information Technology Industry , 2000 .

[32]  Ronald M. Harstad,et al.  An Alternating Recognition Model of English Auctions , 2000 .

[33]  David Lucking-Reiley,et al.  Using field experiments to test equivalence between auction formats: Magic on the internet , 1999 .

[34]  R. Porter,et al.  Empirical Implications of Equilibrium Bidding in First-Price, Symmetric, Common Value Auctions , 1999 .

[35]  Han Hong,et al.  Econometric Models of Ascending Auctions , 1999 .

[36]  Dan Levin,et al.  Optimal Reservation Prices in Auctions , 1996 .

[37]  Harry J. Paarsch,et al.  Identification, Estimation, and Testing in Parametric Empirical Models of Auctions within the Independent Private Values Paradigm , 1996, Econometric Theory.

[38]  J. Laffont,et al.  ECONOMETRICS OF FIRST-PRICE AUCTIONS , 1995 .

[39]  Peter S. Fader,et al.  An Elimination by Aspects Model of Consumer Response to Promotion Calibrated on UPC Scanner Data , 1990 .

[40]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  A theory of auctions and competitive bidding , 1982 .

[41]  S. Rosen Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition , 1974, Journal of Political Economy.