The slippery context effect in psychophysics: Intensive, extensive, and qualitative continua

When subjects gave magnitude estimates of 500- and 2500-Hz tones at various SPLs, they judged a 500-Hz tone of 60 dB to be as loud as a 2500-Hz tone of 57 dB in one context (low SPLs at 500 Hz, high SPLs at 2500 Hz), but as loud as a 2500-Hz tone at 40 dB in another context (high SPLs at 500 Hz, low at 2500 Hz) (Marks, 1988). Such shifts in matches derived from judgments of multi-dimensionally varying stimuli are termedslippery context effects. The present set of seven experiments showed that slippery effects were absent from judgments of pitch of tones at different loudnesses, duration of tones at different pitches, and length of lines at different colors, though a small effect emerged in judgments of duration of tones and lights. Slippery context effects were substantial when subjects gave magnitude estimates of loudness of 500- and 2500-Hz tones under conditions in which the pitch at each trial either was cued visually beforehand or could be known through the regular stimulus sequence, and with instructions to make absolute magnitude estimates. The results are consistent with the view that slippery context effects occur automatically and “preattentively.”

[1]  J. Zwislocki,et al.  Absolute scaling of sensory magnitudes: A validation , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  L E Marks,et al.  Perceptual primacy of dimensions: support for a model of dimensional interaction. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  N I Durlach,et al.  Intensity perception. I. Preliminary theory of intensity resolution. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  L. Allan The perception of time , 1979 .

[5]  D. Cross,et al.  Sequential dependencies and regression in psychophysical judgments , 1973 .

[6]  D. M. Green,et al.  Sequential effects in judgments of loudness. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  Pervasiveness and magnitude of context effects: Evidence for the relativity of absolute magnitude estimation , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  Lawrence E. Marks,et al.  Magnitude-matching: the measurement of taste and smell , 1988 .

[9]  L M Ward,et al.  Critical bands and mixed-frequency scaling: Sequential dependencies, equal-loudness contours, and power function exponents , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  S. Parker,et al.  Does stimulus context affect loudness or only loudness judgments? , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  H. Helson Adaptation-level theory : an experimental and systematic approach to behavior , 1964 .

[12]  L. Marks Reliability of magnitude matching , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  L. M. Ward,et al.  Mixed-modality psychophysical scaling: Sequential dependencies and other properties , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  G R Lockhead,et al.  Range and sequence effects in judgment , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  S. Goldstone,et al.  Judgment of Filled and Unfilled Durations: Intersensory Factors , 1963, Perceptual and motor skills.

[16]  L. M. Ward,et al.  Remembrance of sounds past: memory and psychophysical scaling. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  N I Durlach,et al.  Intensity perception. XIII. Perceptual anchor model of context-coding. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  J W Grau,et al.  The distinction between integral and separable dimensions: evidence for the integrality of pitch and loudness. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[19]  C. McCollough Color Adaptation of Edge-Detectors in the Human Visual System , 1965, Science.

[20]  G. Gescheider,et al.  Stimulus context and absolute magnitude estimation: A study of individual differences , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  L E Marks,et al.  On the cross-modal perception of intensity. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  A. Parducci Category judgment: a range-frequency model. , 1965, Psychological review.

[23]  W. R. Garner The Processing of Information and Structure , 1974 .

[24]  L M Ward,et al.  Stimulus information and sequential dependencies in magnitude estimation and cross-modality matching. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  S. S. Stevens The Relation of Pitch to Intensity , 1935 .

[26]  J. Zwislocki Group and individual relations between sensation magnitudes and their numerical estimates , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  Daniel Algom,et al.  Range and regression, loudness scales, and loudness processing: toward a context-bound psychophysics. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  L. Marks,et al.  Slippery context effect and critical bands. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  L E Marks,et al.  Magnitude estimation and sensory matching , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  W. Larkin,et al.  Frequency-response characteristic of auditory observers detecting signals of a single frequency in noise: the probe-signal method. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.