Microbial nutrient limitation in rhizosphere soils of different food crop families: Evidence from ecoenzymatic stoichiometry

Microbial metabolism directly participates in soil nutrient recycling and ecosystem stability. Although the rhizosphere soil is one of the most active habitats, information on how microorganisms acquire nutrients based on ecoenzymatic stoichiometry is lacking, especially for major food crops under field conditions. Thus, this study aimed to explore the soil nutrient properties and microbial biomass concentrations as well as extracellular enzymatic activities and focused on carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and phosphorus (P) cycling of different crop types, including potato (Solanaceae), maize (cereal), soybean (Leguminosae), and buckwheat (Polygonaceae) in the arid area of northern Shaanxi, China. Microorganisms in the rhizosphere soil of four crops were subjected to relative C and N limitation tests based on ecoenzymatic activities. Among the crops, potato and soybean exhibited the maximum limitations. Linear regression analysis of soil nutrients, microorganisms (stoichiometric homeostasis), and threshold elemental ratio synthetically supported microbial metabolic limitations. This finding coincided with the highest and lowest microbial carbon use efficiencies in soybean (0.58) and potato (0.51), illustrating the distinguishing physiological responses of microbes. Partial least squares path modeling further confirmed that the soil microbial nutrient limitations were significantly regulated by soil nutrient properties and extracellular enzyme activities. Taken together, soil microbial metabolism in agricultural ecosystems was co‐limited by relative C and N regardless of the main food crop families in this region in China (northern Loess Plateau). These observations clarified the nutrient cycling driven by soil elemental stoichiometry at the root–soil interface in arid and oligotrophic ecosystems.

[1]  R. Chang,et al.  Microbial Metabolic Limitation Response to Experimental Warming Along an Altitudinal Gradient in Alpine Grasslands, Eastern Tibetan Plateau , 2022, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[2]  G. Feng,et al.  C:P stoichiometric imbalance between soil and microorganisms drives microbial phosphorus turnover in the rhizosphere , 2022, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[3]  X. Gong,et al.  Changes in rhizosphere soil nitrogen fractions associated with enzyme activities are linked to the microbial community following intercropping combined with nitrogen fertilization , 2022, Land Degradation & Development.

[4]  Chao Zhang,et al.  Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry reflects the regulation of microbial carbon and nitrogen limitation on soil nitrogen cycling potential in arid agriculture ecosystems , 2022, Journal of Soils and Sediments.

[5]  D. Moorhead,et al.  Progressively decreased nitrogen-stimulation of soil phosphatase activity with long-term nitrogen addition , 2022, Applied Soil Ecology.

[6]  H. Urrutia,et al.  Microplastic pollution on the soil and its consequences on the nitrogen cycle: a review , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[7]  F. Zhao,et al.  Microbial traits determine soil C emission in response to fresh carbon inputs in forests across biomes , 2021, Global change biology.

[8]  Shi-huai Deng,et al.  Microbial resource limitation and regulation of soil carbon cycle in Zoige Plateau peatland soils , 2021 .

[9]  D. Schachtman,et al.  Root exudates impact plant performance under abiotic stress. , 2021, Trends in plant science.

[10]  X. Cheng,et al.  Soil nitrogen‐hydrolyzing enzyme activity and stoichiometry following a subtropical land use change , 2021, Land Degradation & Development.

[11]  B. Feng,et al.  Interspecific competition and nitrogen application alter soil ecoenzymatic stoichiometry, microbial nutrient status, and improve grain yield in broomcorn millet/mung bean intercropping systems , 2021, Field Crops Research.

[12]  Y. Liao,et al.  Rhizobacterial communities and crop development in response to long-term tillage practices in maize and soybean fields on the Loess Plateau of China , 2021, CATENA.

[13]  Lie Xiao,et al.  Ecological stoichiometry of plant-soil-enzyme interactions drives secondary plant succession in the abandoned grasslands of Loess Plateau, China , 2021, CATENA.

[14]  S. Roy,et al.  Relating brand anxiety, brand hatred and obsess: Moderating role of age and brand affection , 2021 .

[15]  Xugao Wang,et al.  Stoichiometric imbalance and microbial community regulate microbial elements use efficiencies under nitrogen addition , 2021 .

[16]  W. Ahmed,et al.  Linkages between ecoenzymatic stoichiometry and microbial community structure under long-term fertilization in paddy soil: A case study in China , 2021 .

[17]  S. Yue,et al.  Effects of plastic and straw mulching on soil microbial P limitations in maize fields: Dependency on soil organic carbon demonstrated by ecoenzymatic stoichiometry , 2021 .

[18]  R. Sinsabaugh,et al.  Linking microbial functional gene abundance and soil extracellular enzyme activity: Implications for soil carbon dynamics , 2020, Global change biology.

[19]  Yun-qiang Wang,et al.  Soil moisture mediates microbial carbon and phosphorus metabolism during vegetation succession in a semiarid region , 2020 .

[20]  Yahui Song,et al.  Revealing the nutrient limitation and cycling for microbes under forest management practices in the Loess Plateau – Ecological stoichiometry , 2020 .

[21]  B. Feng,et al.  Linkages between nutrient ratio and the microbial community in rhizosphere soil following fertilizer management. , 2020, Environmental research.

[22]  Yi Li,et al.  Bioaugmentation-assisted phytoremediation of manganese and cadmium co-contaminated soil by Polygonaceae plants (Polygonum hydropiper L. and Polygonum lapathifolium L.) and Enterobacter sp. FM-1 , 2020, Plant and Soil.

[23]  Robert B. Jackson,et al.  Global patterns of terrestrial nitrogen and phosphorus limitation , 2020, Nature Geoscience.

[24]  Jinfeng Gao,et al.  Comparison of structural and physicochemical properties of starches from five coarse grains. , 2019, Food chemistry.

[25]  Jian Deng,et al.  Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry and nutrient dynamics along a revegetation chronosequence in the soils of abandoned land and Robinia pseudoacacia plantation on the Loess Plateau, China , 2019, Soil Biology and Biochemistry.

[26]  He Zhu,et al.  Extracellular enzyme stoichiometry reveals the carbon and phosphorus limitations of microbial metabolisms in the rhizosphere and bulk soils in alpine ecosystems , 2019, Plant and Soil.

[27]  Sha Xue,et al.  How microbes cope with short-term N addition in a Pinus tabuliformis forest-ecological stoichiometry , 2019, Geoderma.

[28]  T. Kunito,et al.  Microbial biomass and ecoenzymatic stoichiometries vary in response to nutrient availability in an arable soil , 2019, European Journal of Soil Biology.

[29]  H. Lambers,et al.  Root-released organic anions in response to low phosphorus availability: recent progress, challenges and future perspectives , 2019, Plant and Soil.

[30]  Linchuan Fang,et al.  Natural grassland as the optimal pattern of vegetation restoration in arid and semi-arid regions: Evidence from nutrient limitation of soil microbes. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[31]  N. Sokol,et al.  Microbial formation of stable soil carbon is more efficient from belowground than aboveground input , 2018, Nature Geoscience.

[32]  Zehao Shen,et al.  Stair-Step Pattern of Soil Bacterial Diversity Mainly Driven by pH and Vegetation Types Along the Elevational Gradients of Gongga Mountain, China , 2018, Front. Microbiol..

[33]  Pengfei Li,et al.  Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry and microbial nutrient limitation in rhizosphere soil in the arid area of the northern Loess Plateau, China , 2018 .

[34]  T. Northen,et al.  Feed Your Friends: Do Plant Exudates Shape the Root Microbiome? , 2018, Trends in plant science.

[35]  Zhong Zhao,et al.  Response of soil microbial community dynamics to Robinia pseudoacacia L. afforestation in the loess plateau: a chronosequence approach , 2018, Plant and Soil.

[36]  Davey L. Jones,et al.  Stability and dynamics of enzyme activity patterns in the rice rhizosphere: Effects of plant growth and temperature , 2017 .

[37]  A. Rosemond,et al.  Changes in nutrient stoichiometry, elemental homeostasis and growth rate of aquatic litter-associated fungi in response to inorganic nutrient supply , 2017, The ISME Journal.

[38]  Yiqi Luo,et al.  Soil extracellular enzyme activities, soil carbon and nitrogen storage under nitrogen fertilization: A meta-analysis , 2016 .

[39]  F. Zhao,et al.  Linkages of C:N:P stoichiometry and bacterial community in soil following afforestation of former farmland , 2016 .

[40]  D. Moorhead,et al.  Vector analysis of ecoenzyme activities reveal constraints on coupled C, N and P dynamics , 2016 .

[41]  D. Moorhead,et al.  Extracellular enzyme kinetics scale with resource availability , 2014, Biogeochemistry.

[42]  D. Burton,et al.  Effect of green manure and supplemental fertility amendments on selected soil quality parameters in an organic potato rotation in Eastern Canada , 2014, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[43]  A. Austin,et al.  Microbial community composition explains soil respiration responses to changing carbon inputs along an Andes-to-Amazon elevation gradient , 2014, The Journal of ecology.

[44]  Colin W. Bell,et al.  Rhizosphere stoichiometry: are C : N : P ratios of plants, soils, and enzymes conserved at the plant species-level? , 2014, The New phytologist.

[45]  Fei Wang,et al.  SOIL EROSION, CONSERVATION, AND ECO‐ENVIRONMENT CHANGES IN THE LOESS PLATEAU OF CHINA , 2013 .

[46]  R. Sinsabaugh,et al.  Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of microbial nutrient acquisition in tropical soils , 2013, Biogeochemistry.

[47]  Benjamin L Turner,et al.  Priming and microbial nutrient limitation in lowland tropical forest soils of contrasting fertility , 2012, Biogeochemistry.

[48]  H. Hartikainen,et al.  Effects of land use on the level, variation and spatial structure of soil enzyme activities and bacterial communities , 2011 .

[49]  Y. Kuzyakov.  Priming effects : interactions between living and dead organic matter , 2010 .

[50]  B. Hill,et al.  Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of microbial organic nutrient acquisition in soil and sediment , 2009, Nature.

[51]  J. Schimel,et al.  Seasonal variation in enzyme activities and temperature sensitivities in Arctic tundra soils , 2009 .

[52]  B. Zebarth,et al.  Organic Amendment History and Crop Rotation Effects on Soil Nitrogen Mineralization Potential and Soil Nitrogen Supply in a Potato Cropping System , 2008 .

[53]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  The Global Stoichiometry of Litter Nitrogen Mineralization , 2008, Science.

[54]  R. Monson,et al.  The effects of tree rhizodeposition on soil exoenzyme activity, dissolved organic carbon, and nutrient availability in a subalpine forest ecosystem , 2007, Oecologia.

[55]  J. Whalen,et al.  Impacts of earthworms on soil nutrients and plant growth in soybean and maize agroecosystems , 2007 .

[56]  John McNeill,et al.  International code of botanical nomenclature (Vienna Code) : adopted by the Seventeenth International Botanical Congress, Vienna, Austria, July 2005 , 2006 .

[57]  James H. Brown,et al.  The metabolic basis of whole-organism RNA and phosphorus content. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[58]  David L. Jones,et al.  The carbon we do not see : The impact of low molecular weight compounds on carbon dynamics and respiration in forest soils - A review , 2005 .

[59]  R. Sinsabaugh,et al.  Enzymic analysis of microbial pattern and process , 2004, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[60]  Joshua P. Schimel,et al.  The implications of exoenzyme activity on microbial carbon and nitrogen limitation in soil: a theoretical model , 2003 .

[61]  P. Brookes,et al.  AN EXTRACTION METHOD FOR MEASURING SOIL MICROBIAL BIOMASS C , 1987 .