Discourse, Syntax, and Prosody: The Brain Reveals an Immediate Interaction

Speech is structured into parts by syntactic and prosodic breaks. In locally syntactic ambiguous sentences, the detection of a syntactic break necessarily follows detection of a corresponding prosodic break, making an investigation of the immediate interplay of syntactic and prosodic information impossible when studying sentences in isolation. This problem can be solved, however, by embedding sentences in a discourse context that induces the expectation of either the presence or the absence of a syntactic break right at a prosodic break. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were compared to acoustically identical sentences in these different contexts. We found in two experiments that the closure positive shift, an ERP component known to be elicited by prosodic breaks, was reduced in size when a prosodic break was aligned with a syntactic break. These results establish that the brain matches prosodic information against syntactic information immediately.

[1]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Prosody-driven Sentence Processing: An Event-related Brain Potential Study , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Journal of Memory and Language , 2001 .

[3]  W.J.M. Haeseryn Algemene Nederlandse spraakkunst , 1997 .

[4]  Mireille Besson,et al.  Brain potentials during semantic and prosodic processing in French. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[5]  Knud Lambrecht,et al.  Information structure and sentence form , 1994 .

[6]  Anne Pier Salverda,et al.  The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension , 2003, Cognition.

[7]  J. Mehler,et al.  Phonological phrase boundaries constrain lexical access II. Infant data , 2004 .

[8]  Ann Cutler,et al.  Prosody in the Comprehension of Spoken Language: A Literature Review , 1997, Language and speech.

[9]  Phillip J. Holcomb,et al.  An electrophysiological investigation of the effects of coreference on word repetition and synonymy , 2005, Brain and Language.

[10]  Sharon Peperkamp,et al.  Discovering words in the continuous speech stream: the role of prosody , 2003, J. Phonetics.

[11]  R. C. Oldfield THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS , 1971 .

[12]  Erwin Marsi,et al.  Prosodic Typology and Transcription : A Unified Approach , 2003 .

[13]  A D Friederici,et al.  Prosodic Boundaries, Comma Rules, and Brain Responses: The Closure Positive Shift in ERPs as a Universal Marker for Prosodic Phrasing in Listeners and Readers , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[14]  M. Rugg,et al.  Modulation of event-related potentials by word repetition: the effects of inter-item lag. , 1989, Psychophysiology.

[15]  Karsten Steinhauer Electrophysiological correlates of prosody and punctuation , 2003, Brain and Language.

[16]  A. Christophea,et al.  Phonological phrase boundaries constrain lexical access I . Adult data q , 2003 .

[17]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Syntactic processing: Evidence from dutch , 1987 .

[18]  O. Witte,et al.  Perception of phrase structure in music , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[19]  Petra Hendriks,et al.  Processing the noun phrase versus sentence coordination ambiguity: Thematic information does not completely eliminate processing difficulty , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  Anne Lacheret,et al.  On-line Processing of Pop-Out Words in Spoken French Dialogues , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  A. Friederici,et al.  Processing Tonal Modulations: An ERP Study , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Sentence processing in the visual and auditory modality: Do comma and prosodic break have parallel functions? , 2008, Brain Research.

[24]  J. Hart,et al.  The role of intonation in speech perception , 1975 .

[25]  M Besson,et al.  The many facets of repetition: a cued-recall and event-related potential analysis of repeating words in same versus different sentence contexts. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  T. Givón,et al.  Topic continuity in discourse : a quantitative cross-language study , 1983 .

[27]  Paul Bloom,et al.  Speech boundaries, syntax and the brain , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  A. Friederici,et al.  Late interaction of syntactic and prosodic processes in sentence comprehension as revealed by ERPs. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[29]  A. Friederici,et al.  Prosody-assisted head-driven access to spoken German compounds. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Brain potentials indicate immediate use of prosodic cues in natural speech processing , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  Carlos Gussenhoven,et al.  Transcription of Dutch intonation , 2005 .

[32]  Charles N. Li,et al.  Subject and topic , 1979 .