The Fog of Change: Opacity and Asperity in Organizations

Initial architectural change in organizations often induces other subsequent changes, generating lengthy cascades of changes in subordinate units. This article extends a formal model of cascading organizational change by examining the implications for organizational change of the limited foresight of those who initiate such change about unit interconnections (structural opacity) and the normative restrictiveness imposed on architectural features by organizational culture (cultural asperity). Opacity leads actors to underestimate the lengths of periods of reorganization and the associated costs of change, thereby prompting them unwittingly to undertake changes with adverse consequences. Increased opacity and asperity lengthen the total time that the organization spends reorganizing and the associated opportunity costs; and the expected effect of an architectural change on mortality hazards increases with the intricacy of the organizational design, structural opacity, and the asperity of organizational culture. We illustrate the theory with an interpretation of the 1995 collapse of Baring Brothers Bank.

[1]  P. Bonacich Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  Glenn R. Carroll,et al.  The evolution of inertia , 2004 .

[3]  N. Repenning,et al.  Unanticipated side effects of successful quality programs: exploring a paradox of organizational improvement , 1997 .

[4]  Michael Hannan,et al.  Foundations of a Theory of Social Forms , 2000 .

[5]  H. Rao,et al.  The Demography of Corporations and Industries , 1999 .

[6]  Erik R. Larsen,et al.  Dynamics of Organizations: Computational Modeling and Organizational Theories , 2001 .

[7]  L. T. F. Gamut Logic, language, and meaning , 1991 .

[8]  Philip Selznick Foundations of the Theory of Organization , 1948 .

[9]  Michael T. Hannan,et al.  A logic for theories in flux: a model-theoretic approach , 2004 .

[10]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .

[11]  Michael T. Hannan,et al.  4. Reasoning with Partial Knowledge , 2002 .

[12]  William L. Simon,et al.  On the Firing Line: My 500 Days at Apple Computer , 1998 .

[13]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  MODELING INTERNAL ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE , 1995 .

[14]  A. Stinchcombe Information and Organizations , 2019 .

[15]  Michael T. Hannan,et al.  Back to Inertia: Theoretical Implications of Alternative Styles of Logical Formalization* , 2000 .

[16]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[17]  H. Simon,et al.  A Formal Theory of the Employment Relationship , 1951 .

[18]  Judith H. Rawnsley,et al.  Total Risk: Nick Leeson and the Fall of Barings Bank , 1995 .

[19]  M. Crozier The Bureaucratic Phenomenon , 1964 .

[20]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Timid choices and bold forecasts: a cognitive perspective on risk taking , 1993 .

[21]  Glenn R. Carroll,et al.  Cascading Organizational Change , 2003, Organ. Sci..