Models of Technology Development in Intermediate Research Organisations

The development and exploitation of new scientific and technological know-how is a prime engine of economic growth. Different innovation systems have developed different approaches to this problem and have built upon varying combinations of public and private support for R&D over time. In this context, research and technology intermediaries play an important brokering and entrepreneurial role. This paper contains a comparative institutional analysis of the policy and business models of the Fraunhofer Society (Germany), IMEC (Belgium), the Holst Centre (the Netherlands), ITRI (Taiwan) and ETRI (South Korea). It includes an investigation and discussion of their main features, modus operandi, opportunities/risks and trade-offs. The study responds to the need to gain better understanding of possible ways to strengthen the capacity of the UK economy to generate value from its science and technology base. The case studies presented in this paper offer a number of useful lessons for the development of new innovation policy instruments of great potential benefit to the UK plc.

[1]  A. Hughes Innovation Policy as Cargo Cult: Myth and Reality in Knowledge-Led Productivity Growth , 2010 .

[2]  Cristiano Antonelli,et al.  Localized technological change , 2003 .

[3]  J. Mathews The origins and dynamics of Taiwan's R&D consortia , 2002 .

[4]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[5]  C. Antonelli,et al.  Venture Capitalism as a Mechanism for Knowledge Governance , 2006 .

[6]  Rna Rudi Bekkers,et al.  Analysing knowledge transfer channels between universities and industry: To what degree do sectors also matter? , 2008 .

[7]  Andy Cosh,et al.  Never mind the quality feel the width: University–industry links and government financial support for innovation in small high-technology businesses in the UK and the USA , 2010 .

[8]  Marian Beise,et al.  Public research and industrial innovations in Germany , 1999 .

[9]  R. Lester,et al.  UK plc. Just how innovative are we , 2006 .

[10]  Rebecca Harding Competition and Collaboration in German Technology Transfer , 2002 .

[11]  V. G Ryckaert,et al.  IMEC Industrial Affiliation Program (IIAP) as IPR model to set up nanotechnology research and patenting , 2008 .

[12]  Jinn-yuh Hsu THE EVOLVING INSTITUTIONAL EMBEDDEDNESS OF A LATE-INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT IN TAIWAN , 2004 .

[13]  Ulrich Schmoch,et al.  Interaction of Universities and Industrial Enterprises in Germany and the United States-A Comparison , 1999 .

[14]  Alasdair Reid,et al.  Tackling the paradox: can attaining global research excellence be compatible with local technology development? , 2004 .

[15]  Jae-Yong Choung,et al.  National Systems of Innovation: Institutional Linkages and Performances in the Case of Korea and Taiwan , 2000, Scientometrics.

[16]  J. Marshall Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2004 .

[17]  Chiung-Wen Hsu,et al.  The government strategy for the upgrading of industrial technology in Taiwan , 2001 .

[18]  Davide Consoli Localised technological change: towards the economics of complexity , 2009, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[19]  Cristiano Antonelli,et al.  Localised Technological Change: Towards the Economics of Complexity , 2008 .

[20]  Yu-Ling Lin,et al.  Externality evaluation: an empirical study of ITRI , 2009, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[21]  B. Clarysse,et al.  Institutional Change and the Resource Flows going to Spin off Projects: The case of IMEC , 2004 .

[22]  J. Howells Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation , 2006 .

[23]  Mike Wright,et al.  Mid-range universities' linkages with industry: Knowledge types and the role of intermediaries , 2008 .

[24]  Wim Van Petegem,et al.  Innovative ways of knowledge transfer between Universities and Industry , 2006 .

[25]  D. Audretsch,et al.  Entrepreneurship, State Economic Development Policy, and the Entrepreneurial University , 2007 .

[26]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  MIT and the Rise of Entrepreneurial Science , 2002 .