Macroinvertebrate Regionalisation for use in the Management of Aquatic Ecosystems in Victoria, Australia

The development of a broader, more holistic approach to aquaticecosystem management has been called for in recent years. Physical and chemical objectives alone are no longer consideredsufficient for the protection of aquatic ecosystems and shouldbe supplemented with biological objectives. The ubiquitousand sedentary nature of macroinvertebrates, combined with theirmeasurable response to environmental conditions, favour their use as important indicators in environmental policies. To establish biological objectives, there is a need for a regionalframework to limit the variability between ecosystems. Past studies have demonstrated that an a posteriori regionalisationapproach may be more useful than an a priori approach in explaining single component (e.g. macroinvertebrates) patternsacross ecosystems. This is particularly important as aquaticresource management agencies often focus on one or twocomponents of the ecosystem to assess environmental health. This study uses an a posteriori method to delineate and describebiological regions based on edge and riffle macroinvertebrate data. The regionalisation will provide a framework for settingbiological objectives, based on the range of reference conditionsmeasured within each separate region. The objectives will includeregional checklists for taxa and biotic indices. Predictive modelling in the style of RIVPACS or AUSRIVAS will also be usedwithin each region to develop objectives, incorporating local, regional and systematic features as predictor variables.

[1]  T. R. E. Southwood,et al.  HABITAT, THE TEMPLET FOR ECOLOGICAL STRATEGIES? , 1977 .

[2]  Chris O. Yoder,et al.  The Role of Biological Indicators in a State Water Quality Management Process , 1998 .

[3]  Richard H. Norris,et al.  Classification of macroinvertebrate communities across drainage basins in Victoria, Australia: consequences of sampling on a broad spatial scale for predictive modelling , 1999 .

[4]  A. H. Weatherley,et al.  Some Aquatic Animals. (Book Reviews: Australian Inland Waters and Their Fauna. Eleven Studies; Australian Freshwater Life. The Invertebrates of Australian Inland Waters) , 1969 .

[5]  P. Newall,et al.  Potential for delineating indicator-defined regions for streams in Victoria, Australia , 2000, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[6]  Wayne S. Davis,et al.  Biological assessment and criteria : tools for water resource planning and decision making , 1995 .

[7]  J. Wright,et al.  An introduction to RIVPACS. , 2000 .

[8]  N. Poff,et al.  Physical habitat template of lotic systems: Recovery in the context of historical pattern of spatiotemporal heterogeneity , 1990 .

[9]  M. Parsons,et al.  The effect of habitat‐specific sampling on biological assessment of water quality using a predictive model , 1996 .

[10]  B. Chessman.  Dietary studies of aquatic insects from two Victorian rivers , 1986 .

[11]  G. Minshall,et al.  The River Continuum Concept , 1980 .

[12]  T. Reynoldson,et al.  The Reference Condition: A Comparison of Multimetric and Multivariate Approaches to Assess Water-Quality Impairment Using Benthic Macroinvertebrates , 1997, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[13]  D. Faith.  Benthic macroinvertebrates in biological surveillance: Monte carlo significance tests on functional groups' responses to environmental gradients , 1990, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[14]  Michael T. Barbour,et al.  Evaluation of EPA's rapid bioassessment benthic metrics: Metric redundancy and variability among reference stream sites , 1992 .

[15]  J. Wright,et al.  The influence of seasonal and taxonomic factors on the ordination and classification of running‐water sites in Great Britain and on the prediction of their macro‐invertebrate communities , 1984 .

[16]  Peter Davies,et al.  Development of a national river bioassessment system (AUSRIVAS) in Australia. , 2000 .

[17]  J. Karr.  Assessment of Biotic Integrity Using Fish Communities , 1981 .

[18]  R. Marchant,et al.  Assessment of an ecoregion approach for classifying macroinvertebrate assemblages from streams in Victoria, Australia , 2000, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[19]  R. Hewlett.  Implications of taxonomic resolution and sample habitat for stream classification at a broad geographic scale , 2000, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[20]  J. Omernik.  Ecoregions of the Conterminous United States , 1987 .

[21]  James R. Karr,et al.  Ecological perspective on water quality goals , 1981 .

[22]  M. Mackerras,et al.  Notes on Australasian Simuliidae (Diptera). II. , 1950 .

[23]  B. Kerans,et al.  Aquatic Invertebrate Assemblages: Spatial and Temporal Differences among Sampling Protocols , 1992, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.