The Pros and Cons of Use of Handheld Electronic Devices During Ward Rounds and the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Purpose The exponential use of handheld electronic devices (HEDs) among healthcare providers has shown the potential to enhance clinical workflows and improve patient care. However, the challenges and risks of carrying these devices during ward rounds and their impact on postgraduate trainees’ (PGTs’) training in general and more specifically during the COVID-19 pandemic need to be explored. Methods A cross-sectional mixed-methods online survey was conducted to evaluate the perceptions of trainees and faculty at Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education International accredited residency and fellowships programs in Qatar on the use of HEDs on clinical workflow, trainees’ education, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. One hundred and fifty-eight participants were enrolled in the study (87 postgraduate trainees and 71 faculty). Exploratory data analysis and descriptive statistics were performed using STATA version 12 and thematic analysis of 301 qualitative responses to the survey open-ended questions using Atlas. ti qualitative software, version 9.4.0. Results Almost all PGTs, 83 (95.4%), and faculty 43 (62.3%) use HEDs during ward rounds. Accessibility of patient information by PGTs 73 (94.8%) and faculty 46 (84.4%) and work efficiency were the main perceived benefits. Hindering communication between team members, disruption of interaction with patients, increased risk of infection and breach of patient confidentiality were among the challenges associated with their use. Carrying devices reduced the frequency of hand hygiene practices and physical examinations of patients by trainees. The COVID-19 pandemic led to a decrease in the use of HEDs by both faculty [38(64%)] and PGTs [42(60%)]. Conclusion HEDs’ use is valued by both faculty and PGTs in enhancing workflow, trainees’ education, patient experience, and patient care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Graduate medical education leaders should adopt measures to monitor their use during ward rounds as they can negatively impact trainees’ education, reduce interaction with patients, increase the risk of infection, and breach patient confidentiality.

[1]  S. Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Survey Fatigue During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Analysis of Neurosurgery Survey Response Rates , 2021, Frontiers in Surgery.

[2]  A. Raza,et al.  Smartphone use in virtual student teaching and virtual ward rounds during and after the COVID-19 pandemic? , 2021, BMJ Innovations.

[3]  H. Wertheim,et al.  Disinfecting handheld electronic devices with UV-C in a healthcare setting , 2021, Infection prevention in practice.

[4]  E. Hitti,et al.  Mobile device use among emergency department healthcare professionals: prevalence, utilization and attitudes , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[5]  R. Mamtani,et al.  Use of Telehealth During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review , 2020, Journal of medical Internet research.

[6]  C. Leaver,et al.  Routine Disinfection of Mobile Communication Devices in the Postanesthesia Care Unit. , 2019, Journal of perianesthesia nursing : official journal of the American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses.

[7]  D. Migneault,et al.  Use of personal mobile devices to record patient data by Canadian emergency physicians and residents. , 2019, CJEM.

[8]  Ara Darzi,et al.  The impact of mobile technology on teamwork and communication in hospitals: a systematic review , 2019, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[9]  Byungtae Lee,et al.  What Clinical Information Is Valuable to Doctors Using Mobile Electronic Medical Records and When? , 2017, Journal of medical Internet research.

[10]  S. Brandt,et al.  Mobile Electronic Medical Records Promote Workflow: Physicians’ Perspective From a Survey , 2016, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[11]  Steven Walczak,et al.  Impacts of mobile tablet computing on provider productivity, communications, and the process of care , 2016, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[12]  Judith W. Dexheimer,et al.  Use of mobile devices in the emergency department: A scoping review , 2015, Health Informatics J..

[13]  Vineet M Arora,et al.  Resident Use of Text Messaging for Patient Care: Ease of Use or Breach of Privacy? , 2015, JMIR medical informatics.

[14]  N. Al-sweih,et al.  Microbiological contamination of mobile phones of clinicians in intensive care units and neonatal care units in public hospitals in Kuwait , 2015, BMC Infectious Diseases.

[15]  A. Zargari,et al.  Mobile Phones as a Potential Vehicle of Infection in a Hospital Setting , 2015, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[16]  L. Caffery,et al.  Radiological interpretation of images displayed on tablet computers: a systematic review. , 2015, The British journal of radiology.

[17]  Susan Szpunar,et al.  Use of portable electronic devices in a hospital setting and their potential for bacterial colonization. , 2015, American journal of infection control.

[18]  S. Brandt,et al.  Tablet computers with mobile electronic medical records enhance clinical routine and promote bedside time: a controlled prospective crossover study , 2014, Journal of Neurology.

[19]  J. Ryan,et al.  Is the iPad suitable for image display at American Board of Radiology examinations? , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  Raman R Khanna,et al.  Tablet computers for hospitalized patients: a pilot study to improve inpatient engagement. , 2014, Journal of hospital medicine.

[21]  O. ten Cate,et al.  Bedside teaching in medical education: a literature review , 2013, Perspectives on medical education.

[22]  J. A. Salkeld,et al.  Evidence that contaminated surfaces contribute to the transmission of hospital pathogens and an overview of strategies to address contaminated surfaces in hospital settings. , 2013, American journal of infection control.

[23]  Neal E Dunlap,et al.  Pilot Study of iPad Incorporation Into Graduate Medical Education. , 2013, Journal of graduate medical education.

[24]  R. Wyber,et al.  The Gr8est Good: Use of text messages between doctors in a tertiary hospital , 2013 .

[25]  James A Levine,et al.  Internal medicine residents' computer use in the inpatient setting. , 2012, Journal of graduate medical education.

[26]  L. Lingard,et al.  Grounded theory in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 70 , 2012, Medical teacher.

[27]  Kristina Groth,et al.  Of organization, device and context: Interruptions from mobile communication in highly specialized care , 2012, Interact. Comput..

[28]  C. Tracy,et al.  Interpretation of remotely downloaded pocket-size cardiac ultrasound images on a web-enabled smartphone: validation against workstation evaluation. , 2011, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[29]  Sharon E. Straus,et al.  Personal health records: a scoping review , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[30]  Bradley C. Love,et al.  Patient education on mobile devices: an e-health intervention for low health literate audiences , 2009, J. Inf. Sci..

[31]  A. Strauss Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[32]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .