Adaptive Variation in Beach Mice Produced by Two Interacting Pigmentation Genes

Little is known about the genetic basis of ecologically important morphological variation such as the diverse color patterns of mammals. Here we identify genetic changes contributing to an adaptive difference in color pattern between two subspecies of oldfield mice (Peromyscus polionotus). One mainland subspecies has a cryptic dark brown dorsal coat, while a younger beach-dwelling subspecies has a lighter coat produced by natural selection for camouflage on pale coastal sand dunes. Using genome-wide linkage mapping, we identified three chromosomal regions (two of major and one of minor effect) associated with differences in pigmentation traits. Two candidate genes, the melanocortin-1 receptor (Mc1r) and its antagonist, the Agouti signaling protein (Agouti), map to independent regions that together are responsible for most of the difference in pigmentation between subspecies. A derived mutation in the coding region of Mc1r, rather than change in its expression level, contributes to light pigmentation. Conversely, beach mice have a derived increase in Agouti mRNA expression but no changes in protein sequence. These two genes also interact epistatically: the phenotypic effects of Mc1r are visible only in genetic backgrounds containing the derived Agouti allele. These results demonstrate that cryptic coloration can be based largely on a few interacting genes of major effect.

[1]  F. B. Sumner Genetic and distributional studies of three sub-species ofPeromyscus , 1930, Journal of Genetics.

[2]  J. Coyne,et al.  THE LOCUS OF EVOLUTION: EVO DEVO AND THE GENETICS OF ADAPTATION , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[3]  P. Insel,et al.  A Single Amino Acid Mutation Contributes to Adaptive Beach Mouse Color Pattern , 2006, Science.

[4]  H. Hoekstra Genetics, development and evolution of adaptive pigmentation in vertebrates , 2006, Heredity.

[5]  Durrell D. Kapan,et al.  Localization of Müllerian Mimicry Genes on a Dense Linkage Map of Heliconius erato , 2006, Genetics.

[6]  T. Glenn,et al.  Sixty polymorphic microsatellite markers for the oldfield mouse developed in Peromyscus polionotus and Peromyscus maniculatus , 2006 .

[7]  Meredith E. Protas,et al.  Genetic analysis of cavefish reveals molecular convergence in the evolution of albinism , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[8]  S. Carroll,et al.  Evolution at Two Levels: On Genes and Form , 2005, PLoS biology.

[9]  Jeremy Schmutz,et al.  Widespread Parallel Evolution in Sticklebacks by Repeated Fixation of Ectodysplasin Alleles , 2005, Science.

[10]  S. Carroll,et al.  Chance caught on the wing: cis-regulatory evolution and the origin of pigment patterns in Drosophila , 2005, Nature.

[11]  H. A. Orr,et al.  The genetic theory of adaptation: a brief history , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[12]  D. Schluter,et al.  Genetic and developmental basis of evolutionary pelvic reduction in threespine sticklebacks , 2004, Nature.

[13]  J. V. Ooijen,et al.  Software for the mapping of quantitative trait loci in experimental populations , 2004 .

[14]  H. Nijhout Polymorphic mimicry in Papilio dardanus: mosaic dominance, big effects, and origins , 2003, Evolution & development.

[15]  D. Bennett,et al.  The color loci of mice--a genetic century. , 2003, Pigment cell research.

[16]  M. Nachman,et al.  The genetic basis of adaptive melanism in pocket mice , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  J. Coyne,et al.  GENETICS OF A DIFFERENCE IN PIGMENTATION BETWEEN DROSOPHILA YAKUBA AND DROSOPHILA SANTOMEA , 2002, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[18]  K. Manly,et al.  Map Manager QTX, cross-platform software for genetic mapping , 2001, Mammalian Genome.

[19]  H. A. Orr,et al.  Haldane's sieve and adaptation from the standing genetic variation. , 2001, Genetics.

[20]  Roeland E. Voorrips,et al.  Software for the calculation of genetic linkage maps , 2001 .

[21]  J. V. Ooijen,et al.  LOD significance thresholds for QTL analysis in experimental populations of diploid species , 1999, Heredity.

[22]  Van Ooijen JW LOD significance thresholds for QTL analysis in experimental populations of diploid species , 1999, Heredity.

[23]  D. I. Våge,et al.  A non-epistatic interaction of agouti and extension in the fox, Vulpes vulpes , 1997, Nature Genetics.

[24]  G. Barsh,et al.  Opposite orientations of an inverted duplication and allelic variation at the mouse agouti locus. , 1996, Genetics.

[25]  M. Belk,et al.  Pelage coloration in oldfield mice (Peromyscus polionotus) : Antipredator adaptation ? , 1996 .

[26]  G. Barsh,et al.  The genetics of pigmentation: from fancy genes to complex traits. , 1996, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[27]  Eric S. Lander,et al.  A comprehensive genetic map of the mouse genome , 1996, Nature.

[28]  Eric S. Lander,et al.  A comprehensive genetic map of the mouse genome , 1996, Nature.

[29]  M. Davisson,et al.  Molecular analysis of reverse mutations from nonagouti (a) to black-and-tan (a(t)) and white-bellied agouti (Aw) reveals alternative forms of agouti transcripts. , 1994, Genes & development.

[30]  J. Nadeau,et al.  Pigmentation phenotypes of variant extension locus alleles result from point mutations that alter MSH receptor function , 1993, Cell.

[31]  H. A. Orr,et al.  The Genetics of Adaptation: A Reassessment , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[32]  J. Endler On the measurement and classification of colour in studies of animal colour patterns , 1990 .

[33]  O. Domon,et al.  Phaeomelanin synthesis and obesity in mice. Interaction of the viable yellow (Avy) and sombre (eso) mutations. , 1978, The Journal of heredity.

[34]  T. Lawlor CHROMOSOMAL EVOLUTION IN PEROMYSCUS , 1974, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[35]  D. Kaufman Adaptive coloration in Peromyscus polionotus experimental selection by owls , 1974 .

[36]  N. Bateman SOMBRE, A VIABLE DOMINANT MUTANT IN THE HOUSE MOUSE , 1961 .

[37]  F. B. Sumner THE ANALYSIS OF A CONCRETE CASE OF INTERGRADATION BETWEEN TWO SUBSPECIES. II. ADDITIONAL DATA AND INTERPRETATIONS. , 1929, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  F. B. Sumner THE ANALYSIS OF A CONCRETE CASE OF INTERGRADATION BETWEEN TWO SUBSPECIES. , 1929, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  Mandy J. Haldane,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Natural and Artificial Selection, Part V: Selection and Mutation , 1927, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[40]  J B Haldane,et al.  A MATHEMATICAL THEORY OF NATURAL AND ARTIFICIAL SELECTION. PART II THE INFLUENCE OF PARTIAL SELF‐FERTILISATION, INBREEDING, ASSORTATIVE MATING, AND SELECTIVE FERTILISATION ON THE COMPOSITION OF MENDELIAN POPULATIONS, AND ON NATURAL SELECTION. , 1924, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.