Optimization of surface roughness parameters in Hybrid-Chemo Magnetorheological Finishing (HC-MRF) process using Response Surface Methodology and Genetic Algorithm

Hybrid Chemo-Magnetorheological Finishing ( HC-MRF) process is an advanced surface finishing process that utilizes the interaction of Magnetorheological Finishing and chemical etching to reduce the surface roughness of the cemented carbide cutting tools. Herein, Murakami’s reagent is used as a Magnetorheological (MR) fluid carrier medium to trigger chemical etching and mechanical abrasion. The synergic action reduces surface finishing time and increases process efficiency. However, optimizing process parameters during the HC-MRF process is required to improve process efficiency further. Response Surface Methodology ( RSM) is used to develop the regression model to study the impact of process parameters (i.e. spindle speed, feed rate, and vol.% of Murakami’s reagent in MR fluid) on the surface quality. Three surface roughness parameters, namely average surface roughness ( Ra), skewness ( Rsk), and kurtosis ( Rk), are opted to analyze the surface characteristics of the polished surface. Furthermore, optimization is performed with the help of a Genetic Algorithm ( GA) to achieve the best surface quality following input parameters. The surface roughness ( Ra) is reduced by 88.97% as the initial Ra value decreases to 34.50 nm from 312.87 nm after the HC-MRF process. The results obtained from RSM and GA are in good agreement with the experimental results. The optimum value of feed rate, spindle speed, and vol.% of Murakami’s reagent in the MR fluid while achieving minimum surface roughness value (i.e. 31.26 nm) through GA are 1.2 mm/min, 23 rpm, and 53%, respectively. The measured kurtosis ( Rku) value of 0.64 at the optimum process parameter condition represents flat peaks on the surface roughness irregularities of the polished surface. Similarly, a skewness ( Rsk) value of 1.46 signifies that the number of peaks is higher than the number of valleys on the polished surface. Furthermore, it is observed that the Vol.% of Murakami’s reagent in MR fluid is the most significant process parameter compared with other parameters among all responses.

[1]  M. Das,et al.  Investigations on a hybrid chemo-magnetorheological finishing process for freeform surface quality enhancement , 2022, Journal of Manufacturing Processes.

[2]  M. Das,et al.  Investigations on the trochoidal toolpath for processing the biomaterial through magnetorheological fluid assisted finishing process , 2022, Journal of Manufacturing Processes.

[3]  Rongrong Li,et al.  Modeling and optimizing the specific cutting energy of medium density fiberboard during the helical up-milling process , 2022, Wood Material Science & Engineering.

[4]  Jingya Li,et al.  Study of Cutting Power and Power Efficiency during Straight-Tooth Cylindrical Milling Process of Particle Boards , 2022, Materials.

[5]  P. M. Mashinini,et al.  Examination of Machining Parameters and Prediction of Cutting Velocity and Surface Roughness Using RSM and ANN Using WEDM of Altemp HX , 2022, Advances in Materials Science and Engineering.

[6]  A. I. Aria,et al.  Rapid surface finishing of chemical vapour deposited tungsten carbide hard coatings by electropolishing , 2021, Surface and Coatings Technology.

[7]  F. Kara,et al.  Analysis and Optimization of Cutting Tool Coating Effects on Surface Roughness and Cutting Forces on Turning of AA 6061 Alloy , 2021, Advances in Materials Science and Engineering.

[8]  F. Kara,et al.  Statistical Analysis of the Effect of the Cutting Tool Coating Type on Sustainable Machining Parameters , 2021, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance.

[9]  Rongrong Li,et al.  Evaluation and Modeling of Processability of Laser Removal Technique for Bamboo Outer Layer , 2021, JOM.

[10]  Sunpreet Singh,et al.  Experimental investigation into nano-finishing of β-TNTZ alloy using magnetorheological fluid magnetic abrasive finishing process for orthopedic applications , 2021 .

[11]  F. Kara,et al.  Optimization of Surface Roughness in Drilling Medium-Density Fiberboard with a Parallel Robot , 2021 .

[12]  F. Kara,et al.  Taguchi optimization of surface roughness in grinding of cryogenically treated AISI 5140 steel , 2020, Materials Testing.

[13]  S. Veldhuis,et al.  An integrative approach to coating/carbide substrate design of CVD and PVD coated cutting tools during the machining of austenitic stainless steel , 2020 .

[14]  J. Ramkumar,et al.  Development of inverse replica fixture for nano-finishing of knee joint using R-MRAFF process , 2018, Journal of Micromanufacturing.

[15]  M. Das,et al.  Simulation and experimental investigation of finishing forces in magnetic field assisted finishing process , 2018 .

[16]  Jun Zhao,et al.  Optimal selection of cutting tool materials based on multi-criteria decision-making methods in machining Al-Si piston alloy , 2016 .

[17]  Noboru Morita,et al.  Development of cutting tools with microscale and nanoscale textures to improve frictional behavior , 2009 .

[18]  Y. Wong,et al.  A study on the fine-finish die-sinking micro-EDM of tungsten carbide using different electrode materials , 2009 .

[19]  Vijay K. Jain,et al.  Parametric study of magnetic abrasive finishing process , 2004 .

[20]  Connie M. Borror,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: A Retrospective and Literature Survey , 2004 .

[21]  I. A. Kattan,et al.  Developing new trends of cutting tool geometry , 1996 .