Effects of cell size and bicarbonate on single photon response variability in retinal rods

Accurate photon counting requires that rods generate highly amplified, reproducible single photon responses (SPRs). The SPR is generated within the rod outer segment (ROS), a multilayered structure built from membranous disks that house rhodopsin. Photoisomerization of rhodopsin at the disk rim causes a local depletion of cGMP that closes ion channels in the plasmalemma located nearby with relative rapidity. In contrast, a photoisomerization at the disk center, distant from the plasmalemma, has a delayed impact on the ion channels due to the time required for cGMP redistribution. Radial differences should be greatest in large diameter rods. By affecting membrane guanylate cyclase activity, bicarbonate could impact spatial inhomogeneity in cGMP content. It was previously known that in the absence of bicarbonate, SPRs are larger and faster at the base of a toad ROS (where the ROS attaches to the rest of the cell) than at the distal tip. Given that bicarbonate enters the ROS at the base and diffuses to the tip and that it expedites flash response recovery, there should be an axial concentration gradient for bicarbonate that would accentuate the base-to-tip SPR differences. Seeking to understand how ROS geometry and bicarbonate affect SPR variability, we used mathematical modeling and made electrophysiological recordings of single rods. Modeling predicted and our experiments confirmed minor radial SPR variability in large diameter, salamander rods that was essentially unchanged by bicarbonate. SPRs elicited at the base and tip of salamander rods were similar in the absence of bicarbonate, but when treated with 30 mM bicarbonate, SPRs at the base became slightly faster than those at the tip, verifying the existence of an axial gradient for bicarbonate. The differences were small and unlikely to undermine visual signaling. However, in toad rods with longer ROSs, bicarbonate somehow suppressed the substantial, axial SPR variability that is naturally present in the absence of bicarbonate. Modeling suggested that the axial gradient of bicarbonate might dampen the primary phototransduction cascade at the base of the ROS. This novel effect of bicarbonate solves a mystery as to how toad vision is able to function effectively in extremely dim light.

[1]  H. Hamm,et al.  Position of rhodopsin photoisomerization on the disk surface confers variability to the rising phase of the single photon response in vertebrate rod photoreceptors , 2020, PloS one.

[2]  V. Torre,et al.  Calcium flares and compartmentalization in rod photoreceptors , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  M. Sandberg,et al.  Modes of Accessing Bicarbonate for the Regulation of Membrane Guanylate Cyclase (ROS-GC) in Retinal Rods and Cones , 2019, eNeuro.

[4]  Yiming Lu,et al.  Light-Induced Length Shrinkage of Rod Photoreceptor Outer Segments , 2018, Translational vision science & technology.

[5]  K. Donner,et al.  The dual rod system of amphibians supports colour discrimination at the absolute visual threshold , 2017, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  G. Fain,et al.  Why are rods more sensitive than cones? , 2016, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  C. Makino,et al.  Bicarbonate and Ca2+ Sensing Modulators Activate Photoreceptor ROS-GC1 Synergistically , 2016, Front. Mol. Neurosci..

[8]  V. Torre,et al.  The phototransduction machinery in the rod outer segment has a strong efficacy gradient , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  C. Makino,et al.  Bicarbonate Modulates Photoreceptor Guanylate Cyclase (ROS-GC) Catalytic Activity* , 2015, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  A. Dizhoor,et al.  Membrane guanylyl cyclase complexes shape the photoresponses of retinal rods and cones , 2014, Front. Mol. Neurosci..

[11]  Wah Chiu,et al.  Three-Dimensional Architecture of the Rod Sensory Cilium and Its Disruption in Retinal Neurodegeneration , 2012, Cell.

[12]  P. Bisegna,et al.  Identification of key factors that reduce the variability of the single photon response , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  T. Wensel,et al.  Biochemical Cascade of Phototransduction , 2011 .

[14]  Giovanni Caruso,et al.  Kinetics of Rhodopsin Deactivation and Its Role in Regulating Recovery and Reproducibility of Rod Photoresponse , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[15]  Daniele Andreucci,et al.  Diffusion of the second messengers in the cytoplasm acts as a variability suppressor of the single photon response in vertebrate phototransduction. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[16]  W. Baumeister,et al.  Three-dimensional architecture of murine rod outer segments determined by cryoelectron tomography , 2007, The Journal of cell biology.

[17]  Daniele Andreucci,et al.  Modeling the role of incisures in vertebrate phototransduction. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[18]  S. Ueno,et al.  Ultracytochemical study of Ca++-ATPase and K+-NPPase activities in retinal photoreceptors of the guinea pig , 2004, Cell and Tissue Research.

[19]  A.-C. Aho,et al.  Visual performance of the toad (Bufo bufo) at low light levels: retinal ganglion cell responses and prey-catching accuracy , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[20]  Alapakkam P Sampath,et al.  Molecular mechanism of spontaneous pigment activation in retinal cones. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[21]  E. Pugh,et al.  Massive Light-Driven Translocation of Transducin between the Two Major Compartments of Rod Cells A Novel Mechanism of Light Adaptation , 2002, Neuron.

[22]  K. Leibovic The response gradient along the rod outer segment: cGMP, age and calcium. , 2001, Progress in brain research.

[23]  N. Artemyev,et al.  Identification of the γ Subunit-interacting Residues on Photoreceptor cGMP Phosphodiesterase, PDE6α′* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[24]  Hoon Kim,et al.  Monte Carlo Statistical Methods , 2000, Technometrics.

[25]  J. Ellory,et al.  Ion Transport , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  T. Lamb,et al.  Variability in the Time Course of Single Photon Responses from Toad Rods Termination of Rhodopsin’s Activity , 1999, Neuron.

[27]  D. Baylor,et al.  Origin of reproducibility in the responses of retinal rods to single photons. , 1998, Biophysical journal.

[28]  W. G. Owen,et al.  Linear transduction of natural stimuli by dark‐adapted and light‐adapted rods of the salamander, Ambystoma tigrinum , 1997, The Journal of physiology.

[29]  S. Hemilä,et al.  Changes in the light-sensitive current of salamander rods upon manipulation of putative pH-regulating mechanisms in the inner and outer segment , 1994, Vision Research.

[30]  E. Pugh,et al.  Diffusion coefficient of cyclic GMP in salamander rod outer segments estimated with two fluorescent probes. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[31]  K. Donner,et al.  Rod phototransduction modulated by bicarbonate in the frog retina: roles of carbonic anhydrase and bicarbonate exchange. , 1990, The Journal of physiology.

[32]  L. Lagnado,et al.  Ion transport by the Na-Ca exchange in isolated rod outer segments. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  The effect of ions on sodium‐calcium exchange in salamander rods. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[34]  A. Mariani,et al.  Photoreceptors of the larval tiger salamander retina , 1986, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[35]  D. Baskin,et al.  Immunocytochemical localization of Na+,K+ adenosine triphosphatase in the rat retina. , 1984, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[36]  E. Pugh,et al.  Protons suppress the dark current of frog retinal rods. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[37]  J. L. Schnapf Dependence of the single photon response on longitudinal position of absorption in toad rod outer segments. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[38]  P. Mcnaughton,et al.  Spatial spread of activation and background desensitization in toad rod outer segments , 1981, The Journal of physiology.

[39]  D. Baylor,et al.  Two components of electrical dark noise in toad retinal rod outer segments. , 1980, The Journal of physiology.

[40]  D. Baylor,et al.  Responses of retinal rods to single photons. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[41]  D. Baylor,et al.  The membrane current of single rod outer segments , 1979, Vision Research.

[42]  A. Cohen New details of the ultrastructure of the outer segments and ciliary connectives of the rods of human and macaque retinas , 1965, The Anatomical record.