Financial Gains and Risks in Pay-for-Performance Bonus Algorithms

Considerable attention has been given to evidence-based process indicators associated with quality of care, while much less attention has been given to the structure and key parameters of the various pay-for-performance (P4P) bonus and penalty arrangements using such measures. In this article we develop a general model of quality payment arrangements and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the key parameters. We then conduct simulation analyses of four general P4P payment algorithms by varying seven parameters, including indicator weights, indicator intercorrelation, degree of uncertainty regarding intervention effectiveness, and initial baseline rates. Bonuses averaged over several indicators appear insensitive to weighting, correlation, and the number of indicators. The bonuses are sensitive to disease manager perceptions of intervention effectiveness, facing challenging targets, and the use of actual-to-target quality levels versus rates of improvement over baseline.

[1]  M. Rosenthal,et al.  Pay-for-performance: will the latest payment trend improve care? , 2007, JAMA.

[2]  A. Epstein.  Paying for performance in the United States and abroad. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  Andrew S. Boozary,et al.  The Commonwealth Fund , 1948, Nature.

[4]  M. Chassin,et al.  The urgent need to improve health care quality. Institute of Medicine National Roundtable on Health Care Quality. , 1998, JAMA.

[5]  C. Marano,et al.  To err is human. Building a safer health system , 2005 .

[6]  James N Weinstein,et al.  United States’ Trends and Regional Variations in Lumbar Spine Surgery: 1992–2003 , 2006, Spine.

[7]  Thomas R. Williams.  Practical design and implementation considerations in pay-for-performance programs. , 2006, The American journal of managed care.

[8]  Molla S. Donaldson,et al.  National Roundtable On Health Care Quality , 1999 .

[9]  J. Christianson,et al.  Health plan pay-for-performance strategies. , 2006, The American journal of managed care.

[10]  Richard Smith.  Improving the management of chronic disease , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  Eric T. Bradlow,et al.  Relationship between Medicare's hospital compare performance measures and mortality rates. , 2006, JAMA.

[12]  E. Fisher.  Paying for performance--risks and recommendations. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Alastair Baker,et al.  Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  Julie M Hook,et al.  Incentive Implementation in Physician Practices: A Qualitative Study of Practice Executive Perspectives on Pay for Performance , 2006, Medical care research and review : MCRR.

[15]  J. Weinstein,et al.  Trends Trends And Geographic Variations In Major Surgery For Degenerative Diseases Of The Hip , Knee , And Spine Is there a roadmap for change ? , 2004 .

[16]  R. Morrison,et al.  Effect of Inpatient Quality of Care on Functional Outcomes in Patients With Hip Fracture , 2006, Medical care.

[17]  James N Weinstein,et al.  Trends and geographic variations in major surgery for degenerative diseases of the hip, knee, and spine. , 2004, Health affairs.