Quantitative accuracy analysis of the discontinuous Galerkin method for seismic wave propagation

SUMMARY We present a quantitative accuracy analysis of the Discontinuous Galerkin Finite-Element method for the simulation of seismic wave propagation on tetrahedral meshes. Several parameters are responsible for the accuracy of results, such as the chosen approximation order, the spatial discretization, that is, number of elements per wavelength, and the propagation distance of the waves due to numerical dispersion and dissipation. As error norm we choose the time‐frequency representation of the envelope and phase misfit of seismograms to assess the accuracy of the resulting seismograms since this provides the time evolution of the spectral content and allows for the clear separation of amplitude and phase errors obtained by the numerical method. Our results can be directly used to set up the necessary modelling parameters for practical applications, such as the minimum approximation order for a given mesh spacing to reach a desired accuracy. Finally, we apply our results to the well-acknowledged LOH.1 and LOH.3 problems of the SPICE Code Validation project, including heterogeneous material and the free surface boundary condition, and compare our solutions with those of other methods. In general, we want to stress the increasing importance of certain standard procedures to facilitate future code validations and comparisons of results in the community of numerical seismology.

[1]  D. Komatitsch,et al.  The spectral element method: An efficient tool to simulate the seismic response of 2D and 3D geological structures , 1998, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[2]  Géza Seriani,et al.  Spectral element method for acoustic wave simulation in heterogeneous media , 1994 .

[3]  J. Kristek,et al.  3D Heterogeneous Staggered-grid Finite-difference Modeling of Seismic Motion with Volume Harmonic and Arithmetic Averaging of Elastic Moduli and Densities , 2002 .

[4]  Jean-Pierre Vilotte,et al.  Solving elastodynamics in a fluid-solid heterogeneous sphere: a parallel spectral element approximation on non-conforming grids , 2003 .

[5]  P. Moczo,et al.  The finite-difference time-domain method for modeling of seismic wave propagation , 2007 .

[6]  B. Fornberg The pseudospectral method: Comparisons with finite differences for the elastic wave equation , 1987 .

[7]  Jean-Pierre Vilotte,et al.  Spectral Element Analysis in Seismology , 2007 .

[8]  D. Komatitsch,et al.  Simulations of Ground Motion in the Los Angeles Basin Based upon the Spectral-Element Method , 2004 .

[9]  K. Marfurt Accuracy of finite-difference and finite-element modeling of the scalar and elastic wave equations , 1984 .

[10]  D. J. Andrews,et al.  From antimoment to moment: Plane-strain models of earthquakes that stop , 1975, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[11]  Steven M. Day,et al.  Misfit Criteria for Quantitative Comparison of Seismograms , 2006 .

[12]  M. Dumbser,et al.  An arbitrary high-order Discontinuous Galerkin method for elastic waves on unstructured meshes — III. Viscoelastic attenuation , 2007 .

[13]  R. Geller,et al.  A new method for computing highly accurate DSM synthetic seismograms , 1995 .

[14]  Robert J. Geller,et al.  Optimally accurate second-order time-domain finite difference scheme for the elastic equation of motion: one-dimensional case , 1998 .

[15]  B. Fornberg On a Fourier method for the integration of hyperbolic equations , 1975 .

[16]  S. Shapiro,et al.  Modeling the propagation of elastic waves using a modified finite-difference grid , 2000 .

[17]  Hiroyuki Fujiwara,et al.  Finite-element Simulation of Seismic Ground Motion with a Voxel Mesh , 2004 .

[18]  Matthias Holschneider,et al.  Wavelets - an analysis tool , 1995, Oxford mathematical monographs.

[19]  J. Kristek,et al.  The finite-difference and finite-element modeling of seismic wave propagation and earthquake motion , 2007 .

[20]  Peter Moczo,et al.  On the Accuracy of the Finite-Difference Schemes: The 1D Elastic Problem , 2006 .

[21]  J. Virieux P-SV wave propagation in heterogeneous media: Velocity‐stress finite‐difference method , 1986 .

[22]  Michael Dumbser,et al.  An arbitrary high-order discontinuous Galerkin method for elastic waves on unstructured meshes - IV. Anisotropy , 2007 .

[23]  J. Carcione The wave equation in generalized coordinates , 1994 .

[24]  R. Madariaga Dynamics of an expanding circular fault , 1976, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[25]  Jean Virieux,et al.  SH-wave propagation in heterogeneous media: velocity-stress finite-difference method , 1984 .

[26]  E. Toro,et al.  An arbitrary high-order Discontinuous Galerkin method for elastic waves on unstructured meshes - V. Local time stepping and p-adaptivity , 2007 .

[27]  Khalid M. Mosalam,et al.  PACIFIC EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING RESEARCH CENTER , 2009 .

[28]  Erik H. Saenger,et al.  Finite-difference modeling of viscoelastic and anisotropic wave propagation using the rotated staggered grid , 2004 .

[29]  J. Bielak,et al.  Domain Reduction Method for Three-Dimensional Earthquake Modeling in Localized Regions, Part I: Theory , 2003 .

[30]  Michael Dumbser,et al.  Accurate Calculation of Fault-Rupture Models Using the High-Order Discontinuous Galerkin Method on Tetrahedral Meshes , 2007 .

[31]  M. Dumbser,et al.  An arbitrary high-order discontinuous Galerkin method for elastic waves on unstructured meshes — II. The three-dimensional isotropic case , 2006 .

[32]  Bengt Fornberg,et al.  A practical guide to pseudospectral methods: Introduction , 1996 .

[33]  M. Bouchon,et al.  Boundary Integral Equations and Boundary Elements Methods in Elastodynamics , 2007 .

[34]  M. Dumbser,et al.  An arbitrary high-order discontinuous Galerkin method for elastic waves on unstructured meshes - I. The two-dimensional isotropic case with external source terms , 2006 .

[35]  R. J. Apsel,et al.  On the Green's functions for a layered half-space. Part II , 1983 .