Modeling Dissolution–Precipitation Kinetics of Alkali-Activated Metakaolin

The numerical model HydratiCA was used to simulate the reaction kinetics of alkali-activated metakaolin, a material belonging to a class of sustainable binders alternative to Portland cement. The full chemistry of the system, including solid phases and aqueous species, is taken into account in these simulations. Specifically, metakaolin dissolution, reaction product nucleation and growth, and ion speciation, and diffusion in solution are simulated. The sodium aluminosilicate (N–A–S–H), formed by the reaction of metakaolin in alkaline solution, is implemented in the model as a combination of co-precipitating pseudo-zeolitic phases, with variable stoichiometry. The results show how variations of the reaction pathways, occurring when alkaline activators of different composition and concentration are used, can be associated with different macroscopic behaviors in terms of mechanical performance and durability. Reconciling these macroscopic properties with the basic chemical processes will be a fundamental technological challenge for the deployment of sustainable technologies in the construction industry.

[1]  J. Bullard A three-dimensional microstructural model of reactions and transport in aqueous mineral systems , 2007 .

[2]  G. Artioli,et al.  Kinetic Model of Calcium-Silicate Hydrate Nucleation and Growth in the Presence of PCE Superplasticizers , 2016 .

[3]  Alaa M. Rashad,et al.  Alkali-activated metakaolin: A short guide for civil Engineer – An overview , 2013 .

[4]  A. Nonat,et al.  Formation of the C-S-H Layer during early hydration of tricalcium silicate grains with different sizes. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[5]  Leslie J. Struble,et al.  Setting and nanostructural evolution of metakaolin geopolymer , 2017 .

[6]  Frank Bullen,et al.  Quantitative kinetic and structural analysis of geopolymers. Part 1. The activation of metakaolin wi , 2012 .

[7]  J.S.J. van Deventer,et al.  Geopolymerisation kinetics. 2. Reaction kinetic modelling , 2007 .

[8]  Olivier Diat,et al.  Structural Evolution during geopolymerization from an early age to consolidated material. , 2012, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[9]  W. Tremel,et al.  Two-Step Nucleation Process of Calcium Silicate Hydrate, the Nanobrick of Cement , 2018 .

[10]  Yousif K. Kharaka,et al.  A Compilation of Rate Parameters of Water-Mineral Interaction Kinetics for Application to Geochemical Modeling , 2004 .

[11]  Jeffrey W. Bullard,et al.  The Filler Effect: The Influence of Filler Content and Surface Area on Cementitious Reaction Rates , 2013 .

[12]  M. R. Andalibi,et al.  On the Mesoscale Mechanism of Synthetic Calcium-Silicate-Hydrate Precipitation: A Population Balance Modeling Approach , 2018 .

[13]  Jeffrey W. Bullard,et al.  New Insights Into the Effect of Calcium Hydroxide Precipitation on the Kinetics of Tricalcium Silicate Hydration , 2010 .

[14]  B. Lothenbach,et al.  Zeolite formation in the presence of cement hydrates and albite , 2017 .

[15]  A. Navrotsky,et al.  Formation and hydration enthalpies of the hydrosodalite family of materials , 2006 .

[16]  William L. George,et al.  A parallel reaction-transport model applied to cement hydration and microstructure development , 2010 .

[17]  M. Blanco-Varela,et al.  Alkaline Activation of Metakaolin: Effect of Calcium Hydroxide in the Products of Reaction , 2004 .

[18]  Jeffrey W Bullard Approximate rate constants for nonideal diffusion and their application in a stochastic model. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[19]  C. White,et al.  Modeling the Formation of Alkali Aluminosilicate Gels at the Mesoscale Using Coarse-Grained Monte Carlo. , 2016, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[20]  R. Hooton Current developments and future needs in standards for cementitious materials , 2015 .

[21]  Hao Wang,et al.  Quantitative kinetic and structural analysis of geopolymers. Part 2. Thermodynamics of sodium silica , 2013 .

[22]  J. Davidovits Geopolymers Based on Natural and Synthetic Metakaolin a Critical Review , 2018 .

[23]  J. Gale,et al.  Water is the key to nonclassical nucleation of amorphous calcium carbonate. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[24]  R. Howie,et al.  An Introduction to the Rock-Forming Minerals , 1966 .

[25]  Sun Wei,et al.  Semi-empirical AM1 calculations on 6-memebered alumino-silicate rings model: implications for dissolution process of metakaoline in alkaline solutions , 2007 .

[26]  R. Garrels,et al.  Diffusion Coefficient of Silica in Seawater , 1971 .

[27]  Luca Valentini,et al.  Alkali-activated calcined smectite clay blended with waste calcium carbonate as a low-carbon binder , 2018 .

[28]  V. Sirivivatnanon,et al.  Kinetics of geopolymerization: Role of Al2O3 and SiO2 , 2007 .

[29]  Helmut Cölfen,et al.  Stable Prenucleation Calcium Carbonate Clusters , 2008, Science.

[30]  Longtu Li,et al.  A review: The comparison between alkali-activated slag (Si + Ca) and metakaolin (Si + Al) cements , 2010 .

[31]  K. Sagoe-Crentsil,et al.  Dissolution processes, hydrolysis and condensation reactions during geopolymer synthesis: Part I—Low Si/Al ratio systems , 2007 .

[32]  J. Bullard A Determination of Hydration Mechanisms for Tricalcium Silicate Using a Kinetic Cellular Automaton Model , 2008 .

[33]  M. Arnoult,et al.  How to control the geopolymer setting time with the alkaline silicate solution , 2018, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids.

[34]  Julien Rouyer,et al.  Evidence of a Fractal Percolating Network During Geopolymerization , 2015 .

[35]  B. Lothenbach,et al.  Thermodynamic modelling of alkali-activated slag cements , 2015 .

[36]  Y. Liew,et al.  Structure and properties of clay-based geopolymer cements: A review , 2016 .

[37]  J. Deventer,et al.  Historical Aspects and Overview , 2014 .

[38]  J. Deventer,et al.  The effect of silica availability on the mechanism of geopolymerisation , 2011 .

[39]  T. Karapiperis,et al.  Cellular automaton model of precipitation/dissolution coupled with solute transport , 1995, comp-gas/9502004.

[40]  M. Illikainen,et al.  One-part alkali-activated materials : a review , 2018 .

[41]  Maria Chiara Bignozzi,et al.  Atomistic Simulations of Geopolymer Models: The Impact of Disorder on Structure and Mechanics. , 2018, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[42]  N. A. Deskins,et al.  Modeling the Polymerization Process for Geopolymer Synthesis through Reactive Molecular Dynamics Simulations , 2018 .

[43]  Martin Cyr,et al.  Carbonation in the pore solution of metakaolin-based geopolymer , 2016 .

[44]  A. Katz,et al.  The formation of crystalline phases in metakaolin-based geopolymers in the presence of sodium nitrate , 2016, Journal of Materials Science.

[45]  J. Dandurand,et al.  Determination of the surface energy of amorphous silica from solubility measurements in micropores , 1985 .

[46]  J. Deventer,et al.  Understanding the relationship between geopolymer composition, microstructure and mechanical properties , 2005 .

[47]  Hubert Rahier,et al.  Durability of alkali activated cement produced from kaolinitic clay , 2015 .

[48]  Peter Graham,et al.  Solubility of Zeolite A and Its Amorphous Precursor under Synthesis Conditions , 1999 .

[49]  Zuhua Zhang,et al.  Geopolymerization process of alkali-metakaolinite characterized by isothermal calorimetry , 2009 .

[50]  J. Cravillon,et al.  Fast nucleation and growth of ZIF-8 nanocrystals monitored by time-resolved in situ small-angle and wide-angle X-ray scattering. , 2011, Angewandte Chemie.

[51]  J. Wastiels,et al.  Characterization of alkali activated kaolinitic clay , 2013 .

[52]  P. Sipos The structure of Al(III) in strongly alkaline aluminate solutions — A review , 2009 .

[53]  P. Duxson,et al.  Effect of Alkali Cations on Aluminum Incorporation in Geopolymeric Gels , 2005 .

[54]  N. Roussel,et al.  Mechanical properties and compositional heterogeneities of fresh geopolymer pastes , 2013 .

[55]  H. Barnes,et al.  Solubility and stability of zeolites in aqueous solution: I. Analcime, Na-, and K-clinoptilolite , 1998 .

[56]  J. Banfield,et al.  Crystallization by particle attachment in synthetic, biogenic, and geologic environments , 2015, Science.

[57]  J. Deventer,et al.  Dissolution behaviour of source materials for synthesis of geopolymer binders: A kinetic approach , 2016 .

[58]  D. Zahn Thermodynamics and Kinetics of Prenucleation Clusters, Classical and Non-Classical Nucleation , 2015, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[59]  J. Provis,et al.  Binder Chemistry – Low-Calcium Alkali-Activated Materials , 2014 .

[60]  C. Catlow,et al.  Modeling the Polymerization of Aluminosilicate Clusters , 2012 .

[61]  Un Desa Transforming our world : The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development , 2016 .

[62]  Hannes Jónsson,et al.  Dynamics of basaltic glass dissolution - Capturing microscopic effects in continuum scale models , 2013 .

[63]  J. Deventer,et al.  Do Geopolymers Actually Contain Nanocrystalline Zeolites? A Reexamination of Existing Results , 2005 .

[64]  Wesley Griffin,et al.  A Critical Comparison of 3D Experiments and Simulations of Tricalcium Silicate Hydration. , 2018, Journal of the American Ceramic Society. American Ceramic Society.

[65]  T. K. Radhakrishnan,et al.  A Review of Classical and Nonclassical Nucleation Theories , 2016 .