Legitimacy Without Democracy? Sources of Diffuse Regime Support in Post-Colonial Hong Kong

The resilience of non-democratic regimes in the past decades demonstrates that some authoritarian regimes have figured out ways to consolidate regime support without democratic elections. Hong Kong is a remarkable case of “legitimacy without democracy” as the system of government enjoyed a certain level of legitimacy since colonial days without being democratically elected. Using Hong Kong as a case and based on data from several waves of Asian Barometer Survey (ABS), this study analyzes the impact of citizens’ evaluation of the economic conditions, perception of freedoms, perceived procedural justice and institutional trust, and stability concerns on diffuse regime support in Hong Kong. There are three key findings of this study. First, economic performance is not a significant predictor of diffuse regime support in the case of Hong Kong, whereas, second, institutional trust and perceived civil liberties are. Finally, we found indirect evidence for the role of stability in shaping regime support, although its importance seems far less important than institutional trust and civil liberties.

[1]  B. Dickson.  Lily L. Tsai, When People Want Punishment: Retributive Justice and the Puzzle of Authoritarian Popularity , 2022, Journal of Chinese Political Science.

[2]  Ming-Jen Lin,et al.  Anti-ELAB Movement, National Security Law, and heterogeneous institutional trust in Hong Kong , 2021, Japanese Journal of Political Science.

[3]  Lily L. Tsai.  When People Want Punishment , 2021 .

[4]  S. Wong,et al.  Electoral impacts of a failed uprising: Evidence from Hong Kong's Umbrella Movement , 2021 .

[5]  Filippo Costa Buranelli.  Authoritarianism as an Institution? The Case of Central Asia , 2020 .

[6]  Francis L. F. Lee,et al.  Five Demands and (Not Quite) Beyond , 2020 .

[7]  R. Truex,et al.  In Search of Self-Censorship , 2020, British Journal of Political Science.

[8]  A. Roets,et al.  Disliked but Free to Speak: Cognitive Ability Is Related to Supporting Freedom of Speech for Groups Across the Ideological Spectrum , 2020, Social Psychological and Personality Science.

[9]  Andrew J. Nathan.  The Puzzle of Authoritarian Legitimacy , 2020, Journal of Democracy.

[10]  Mathew Y. H. Wong,et al.  Understanding youth activism and radicalism: Chinese values and socialization , 2019, The Social Science Journal.

[11]  A. Ku.  In Search of a New Political Subjectivity in Hong Kong: The Umbrella Movement as a Street Theater of Generational Change , 2019, The China Journal.

[12]  Seraphine F. Maerz.  The Many Faces of Authoritarian Persistence: A Set-Theory Perspective on the Survival Strategies of Authoritarian Regimes , 2018, Government and Opposition.

[13]  Fei Shen,et al.  Revisiting the Asian Values Thesis: An Empirical Study of Asian Values, Internet Use, and Support for Freedom of Expression in 11 Societies , 2018 .

[14]  S. Guriev,et al.  The Popularity of Authoritarian Leaders: A Cross-National Investigation , 2017 .

[15]  Ma Ngok.  Protracted transition in a liberal autocracy , 2017 .

[16]  Brian C. H. Fong.  In-between liberal authoritarianism and electoral authoritarianism: Hong Kong’s democratization under Chinese sovereignty, 1997–2016 , 2017 .

[17]  Sebastian Veg.  The Rise of “Localism” and Civic Identity in Post-handover Hong Kong: Questioning the Chinese Nation-state , 2017, The China Quarterly.

[18]  M. Kaeding.  The Rise of “Localism” in Hong Kong , 2017 .

[19]  L. Diamond,et al.  Authoritarianism Goes Global: The Challenge to Democracy , 2016 .

[20]  Dali L. Yang,et al.  Lying or Believing? Measuring Preference Falsification From a Political Purge in China , 2015 .

[21]  M. Dimitrov.  Why Communism Did Not Collapse: Understanding Authoritarian Regime Resilience In Asia And Europe , 2013 .

[22]  Yun-han Chu,et al.  Southeast Asia: Sources of Regime Support , 2013 .

[23]  Johannes Gerschewski.  The three pillars of stability: legitimation, repression, and co-optation in autocratic regimes , 2013 .

[24]  Yun-han Chu.  Sources of Regime Legitimacy and the Debate over the Chinese Model , 2013 .

[25]  W. J. Dobson.  The Dictator's Learning Curve: Inside the Global Battle for Democracy , 2012 .

[26]  Ma Ngok.  Value Changes and Legitimacy Crisis in Post-industrial Hong Kong , 2011 .

[27]  W. Lam.  Political legitimacy in Hong Kong: a hybrid notion , 2011 .

[28]  M. Wigell.  Mapping ‘Hybrid Regimes’: Regime Types and Concepts in Comparative Politics , 2008 .

[29]  Arjun Tremblay.  Assessing the Quality of Democracy , 2007, Canadian Journal of Political Science.

[30]  W. Lam.  Understanding the Political Culture of Hong Kong: The Paradox of Activism and Depoliticization , 2004 .

[31]  Andrew J. Nathan.  China's Changing of the Guard: Authoritarian Resilience , 2003 .

[32]  Lau Siu‐kai,et al.  Between Liberal Autocracy and Democracy: Democratic Legitimacy in Hong Kong , 2002 .

[33]  V. Hesli,et al.  The Impact of Time and Economic Circumstances on Popular Evaluations of Russia's President , 2001 .

[34]  Ming Sing.  Democratization and economic development: The anomalous case of Hong Kong , 1996 .

[35]  J. M. Maravall.  The Myth of the Authoritarian Advantage , 2008 .

[36]  A. Hirschman,et al.  Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States , 1970 .