Case report: Pharmacokinetics of pembrolizumab in a patient with stage IV non–small cell lung cancer after a single 200 mg administration

Background Pembrolizumab is a well-tolerated biologic agent with a potentially stable and durable anti-tumor response. Unfortunately, discontinuation of therapy can occur as a consequence of immune-related adverse effects (irAEs). These irAEs appear independent of dose and exposure. However, such irAEs might also result from pembrolizumab’s highly specific mechanism of action and current dosing regimens. However, the currently available pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) data to reassess dosing strategies are insufficient. To highlight the importance of additional PK/PD studies, we present a case describing the complexity of pembrolizumab’s PK/PD after a single 200 mg pembrolizumab dose in a treatment-naive patient with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Case description A 72-year-old man with stage IV NSCLC presented hepatotoxic symptoms 19 days after receiving the first 200 mg pembrolizumab dose. Hence, pembrolizumab therapy was paused, and prednisolone therapy was initiated, which successfully inhibited the toxic effect of pembrolizumab. However, repeated flare-ups due to prednisolone tapering suggest that the toxic effect of pembrolizumab outlasts the presence of pembrolizumab in the bloodstream. This further suggests that the T-cell–mediated immune response outlasts the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) receptor occupancy by pembrolizumab, which challenges the need for the current fixed-interval strategies and their stop criteria. Furthermore, a validated ELISA quantified pembrolizumab levels in 15 samples within 123 days after administration. A shift in the pembrolizumab clearance rate was evident ensuing day 77 (0.6 µg/mL) after administration. Pembrolizumab levels up to day 77 (9.1–0.6 µg/mL) strongly exhibited a linear, first-order clearance (R2 = 0.991), whereas after day 77, an accelerated non-linear clearance was observed. This transition from a linear to non-linear clearance was most likely a result of full target receptor saturation to non-full target receptor saturation, in which the added effect of target-mediated drug disposition occurs. This suggests that pembrolizumab’s targets were fully saturated at levels above 0.6 µg/mL, which is 43 to 61 times lower than the steady-state trough levels (Ctrough,ss) of the currently registered fixed-dosing regimens (3–5).

[1]  D. Davar,et al.  Immune-Related Adverse Events in PD-1 Treated Melanoma and Impact Upon Anti-Tumor Efficacy: A Real World Analysis , 2021, Frontiers in Oncology.

[2]  M. Hino,et al.  Delayed immune-related neutropenia with hepatitis by pembrolizumab. , 2021, Immunotherapy.

[3]  M. Ratain,et al.  Pharmacokinetic Simulation Analysis of Less Frequent Nivolumab and Pembrolizumab Dosing: Pharmacoeconomic Rationale for Dose Deescalation , 2021, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[4]  J. Aerts,et al.  Prospective real-world study on the pharmacokinetics of pembrolizumab in patients with solid tumors , 2021, Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer.

[5]  D. Stenehjem,et al.  Real-world outcomes of immunotherapy-based regimens in first-line advanced non-small cell lung cancer. , 2021, Lung cancer.

[6]  L. Lipton,et al.  Very Delayed Acute Hepatitis after Pembrolizumab Therapy for Advanced Malignancy: How Long Should We Watch? , 2021, Current oncology.

[7]  J. Ciccolini,et al.  Cancer Immunotherapy Dosing: A Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Perspective , 2020, Vaccines.

[8]  G. Helmlinger,et al.  Dose dependence of treatment-related adverse events for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies: a model-based meta-analysis , 2020, Oncoimmunology.

[9]  S. Okada,et al.  Clinical Features of Liver Injury Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Japanese Patients , 2019, Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology.

[10]  S. Suryawanshi,et al.  Evaluation of covariate effects on pharmacokinetics of monoclonal antibodies in oncology , 2019, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[11]  R. Bell,et al.  Delayed immune-related events (DIRE) after discontinuation of immunotherapy: diagnostic hazard of autoimmunity at a distance , 2019, Journal of Immunotherapy for Cancer.

[12]  H. Sung,et al.  Associations of serum liver enzyme levels and their changes over time with all-cause and cause-specific mortality in the general population: a large-scale national health screening cohort study , 2019, BMJ Open.

[13]  I. Trocóniz,et al.  Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors , 2019, Clinical Pharmacokinetics.

[14]  D. Eurich,et al.  Dosing and Timing of Immuno-Oncology Drugs , 2019 .

[15]  B. Turner International Union Against Cancer (UICC) , 2019, B-Model Gromov-Witten Theory.

[16]  L. Peletier,et al.  Predicting the Onset of Nonlinear Pharmacokinetics , 2018, CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology.

[17]  P. Lorigan,et al.  Dose Rationalization of Pembrolizumab and Nivolumab Using Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Simulation and Cost Analysis , 2018, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[18]  M. Leshno,et al.  A Phamacoeconomic Analysis of Personalized Dosing vs Fixed Dosing of Pembrolizumab in Firstline PD-L1-Positive Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2017, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[19]  Peng-fei Wang,et al.  Immune-Related Adverse Events Associated with Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Treatment for Malignancies: A Meta-Analysis , 2017, Front. Pharmacol..

[20]  C. Parkinson,et al.  Severe steroid-resistant anti-PD1 T-cell checkpoint inhibitor-induced hepatotoxicity driven by biliary injury , 2017, ESMO Open.

[21]  M. Garg,et al.  Current Diagnosis and Management of Immune Related Adverse Events (irAEs) Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy , 2017, Front. Pharmacol..

[22]  Manash S. Chatterjee,et al.  Population Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Tumor Size Dynamics in Pembrolizumab‐Treated Advanced Melanoma , 2016, CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology.

[23]  J. Stone,et al.  Model‐Based Characterization of the Pharmacokinetics of Pembrolizumab: A Humanized Anti–PD‐1 Monoclonal Antibody in Advanced Solid Tumors , 2016, CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology.

[24]  S. Kang,et al.  Using Model‐Based “Learn and Confirm” to Reveal the Pharmacokinetics‐Pharmacodynamics Relationship of Pembrolizumab in the KEYNOTE‐001 Trial , 2016, CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology.

[25]  Lon Smith,et al.  Phase I Study of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475; Anti–PD-1 Monoclonal Antibody) in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors , 2015, Clinical Cancer Research.

[26]  Avinash A. K. Math,et al.  A review on laboratory liver function tests , 2009, The Pan African medical journal.

[27]  Leslie H. Sobin,et al.  TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, 7th Edition , 2009 .

[28]  F. Schmidt Meta-Analysis , 2008 .

[29]  R. Green,et al.  AGA technical review on the evaluation of liver chemistry tests. , 2002, Gastroenterology.

[30]  Richard A. Szucs,et al.  TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors. 5th ed , 1998 .

[31]  R. Navinchandra Amin,et al.  Real World Analysis , 1988 .