Hidden Markov modeling for single channel kinetics with filtering and correlated noise.

Hidden Markov modeling (HMM) can be applied to extract single channel kinetics at signal-to-noise ratios that are too low for conventional analysis. There are two general HMM approaches: traditional Baum's reestimation and direct optimization. The optimization approach has the advantage that it optimizes the rate constants directly. This allows setting constraints on the rate constants, fitting multiple data sets across different experimental conditions, and handling nonstationary channels where the starting probability of the channel depends on the unknown kinetics. We present here an extension of this approach that addresses the additional issues of low-pass filtering and correlated noise. The filtering is modeled using a finite impulse response (FIR) filter applied to the underlying signal, and the noise correlation is accounted for using an autoregressive (AR) process. In addition to correlated background noise, the algorithm allows for excess open channel noise that can be white or correlated. To maximize the efficiency of the algorithm, we derive the analytical derivatives of the likelihood function with respect to all unknown model parameters. The search of the likelihood space is performed using a variable metric method. Extension of the algorithm to data containing multiple channels is described. Examples are presented that demonstrate the applicability and effectiveness of the algorithm. Practical issues such as the selection of appropriate noise AR orders are also discussed through examples.

[1]  T R Chay Kinetic modeling for the channel gating process from single channel patch clamp data. , 1988, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  K L Magleby,et al.  Identifying kinetic gating mechanisms for ion channels by using two-dimensional distributions of simulated dwell times , 1990, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  F G Ball,et al.  Ion-channel gating mechanisms: model identification and parameter estimation from single channel recordings , 1989, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences.

[4]  K L Magleby,et al.  Estimating kinetic parameters for single channels with simulation. A general method that resolves the missed event problem and accounts for noise. , 1990, Biophysical journal.

[5]  Fred J. Sigworth,et al.  Fitting and Statistical Analysis of Single-Channel Records , 1983 .

[6]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical recipes in C , 2002 .

[7]  R Horn,et al.  Estimating kinetic constants from single channel data. , 1983, Biophysical journal.

[8]  F. Sigworth Electronic Design of the Patch Clamp , 1983 .

[9]  F Sachs,et al.  A direct optimization approach to hidden Markov modeling for single channel kinetics. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[10]  S H Chung,et al.  Characterization of single channel currents using digital signal processing techniques based on Hidden Markov Models. , 1990, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[11]  D R Fredkin,et al.  Bayesian restoration of single-channel patch clamp recordings. , 1992, Biometrics.

[12]  Roman Kuc,et al.  Identification of hidden Markov models for ion channel currents. I. Colored background noise , 1998, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[13]  S.M. Kay,et al.  Spectrum analysis—A modern perspective , 1981, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[14]  F J Sigworth,et al.  Activation of Torpedo acetylcholine receptors expressed in mouse fibroblasts. Single channel current kinetics reveal distinct agonist binding affinities , 1990, The Journal of general physiology.

[15]  Richard Fitzhugh,et al.  Statistical properties of the asymmetric random telegraph signal, with applications to single-channel analysis , 1983 .

[16]  Anthony Auerbach,et al.  Identification of a High Affinity Divalent Cation Binding Site near the Entrance of the NMDA Receptor Channel , 1996, Neuron.

[17]  Roman Kuc,et al.  Identification of hidden Markov models for ion channel currents. II. State-dependent excess noise , 1998, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[18]  J. Rice,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation and identification directly from single-channel recordings , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  Stephen A. Dyer,et al.  Digital signal processing , 2018, 8th International Multitopic Conference, 2004. Proceedings of INMIC 2004..

[20]  John A. Rice,et al.  Fast evaluation of the likelihood of an HMM: ion channel currents with filtering and colored noise , 2001, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[21]  Allan O. Steinhardt,et al.  Fast algorithms for digital signal processing , 1986, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[22]  R. Fletcher Practical Methods of Optimization , 1988 .

[23]  Lawrence R. Rabiner,et al.  A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition , 1989, Proc. IEEE.

[24]  B. Sakmann,et al.  Single-Channel Recording , 1995, Springer US.

[25]  F. Qin,et al.  Estimating single-channel kinetic parameters from idealized patch-clamp data containing missed events. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[26]  A. Auerbach,et al.  Maximum likelihood estimation of aggregated Markov processes , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[27]  K L Magleby,et al.  Calcium dependence of open and shut interval distributions from calcium‐activated potassium channels in cultured rat muscle. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  John Leclerc Walsh Extraction of single channel current from correlated noise via a hidden Markov model , 1992 .