Comparison of gestational age at birth based on last menstrual period and ultrasound during the first trimester.

Reported last menstrual period (LMP) is commonly used to estimate gestational age (GA) but may be unreliable. Ultrasound in the first trimester is generally considered a highly accurate method of pregnancy dating. The authors compared first trimester report of LMP and first trimester ultrasound for estimating GA at birth and examined whether disagreement between estimates varied by maternal and infant characteristics. Analyses included 1867 singleton livebirths to women enrolled in a prospective pregnancy cohort. The authors computed the difference between LMP and ultrasound GA estimates (GA difference) and examined the proportion of births within categories of GA difference stratified by maternal and infant characteristics. The proportion of births classified as preterm, term and post-term by pregnancy dating methods was also examined. LMP-based estimates were 0.8 days (standard deviation = 8.0, median = 0) longer on average than ultrasound estimates. LMP classified more births as post-term than ultrasound (4.0% vs. 0.7%). GA difference was greater among young women, non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic women, women of non-optimal body weight and mothers of low-birthweight infants. Results indicate first trimester report of LMP reasonably approximates gestational age obtained from first trimester ultrasound, but the degree of discrepancy between estimates varies by important maternal characteristics.

[1]  K. Roghmann,et al.  Early vaginal bleeding, late prenatal care, and misdating in adolescent pregnancies. , 1991, Pediatrics.

[2]  P. Grøttum,et al.  Fetal outcome when the ultrasound estimate of the day of delivery is more than 14 days later than the last menstrual period estimate , 1999, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[3]  D J Hutchon.  Routine ultrasound is the method of choice for dating pregnancy , 1999, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[4]  J. Himes,et al.  A United States National Reference for Fetal Growth , 1996, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[5]  Gary G. Koch,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis Using The SAS1 System , 1995 .

[6]  Megan L. Wier,et al.  Assessing the quality of last menstrual period date on California birth records. , 2007, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[7]  Jun Zhang,et al.  The research implications of the selection of a gestational age estimation method. , 2007, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[8]  S. Harlow,et al.  Epidemiology of menstruation and its relevance to women's health. , 1995, Epidemiologic reviews.

[9]  A. Wilcox,et al.  Bias in studies of preterm and postterm delivery due to ultrasound assessment of gestational age. , 1995 .

[10]  D. Savitz,et al.  Recruitment for a community-based study of early pregnancy: the Right From The Start study. , 2004, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[11]  G. Breart,et al.  Determinants and consequences of discrepancies in menstrual and ultrasonographic gestational age estimates , 2005, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[12]  Sexual Difference in Early Fetal Crown-Rump Length versus Gestational Age in Pregnancies Arising from in vitro Fertilization , 1998, Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation.

[13]  A. Wilcox,et al.  Errors in gestational age: evidence of bleeding early in pregnancy. , 1999, American journal of public health.

[14]  M S Kramer,et al.  The validity of gestational age estimation by menstrual dating in term, preterm, and postterm gestations. , 1988, JAMA.

[15]  B. Backe,et al.  Adverse obstetric outcome in fetuses that are smaller than expected at second trimester routine ultrasound examination , 2002, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[16]  J. Olsen,et al.  Correlation between self‐reported gestational age and ultrasound measurements , 2004, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[17]  M. Susser,et al.  Early ultrasound dating of pregnancy: selection and measurement biases. , 1995, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[18]  J. Blum,et al.  Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2d ed , 1985 .

[19]  G. Berkowitz,et al.  Epidemiology of preterm birth. , 1993, Epidemiologic reviews.

[20]  D. Waller,et al.  Assessing number-specific error in the recall of onset of last menstrual period. , 2000, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[21]  C. Weinberg,et al.  Application of a method for estimating day of ovulation using urinary estrogen and progesterone metabolites. , 1995, Epidemiology.

[22]  M. Kramer,et al.  How does early ultrasound scan estimation of gestational age lead to higher rates of preterm birth? , 2002, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[23]  D. Savitz,et al.  Comparison of pregnancy dating by last menstrual period, ultrasound scanning, and their combination. , 2002, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[24]  B. Ottesen,et al.  Ultrasonography in pregnancy , 1994, Ugeskrift for laeger.

[25]  D. Baird,et al.  A comparison of recalled date of last menstrual period with prospectively recorded dates. , 2005, Journal of women's health.

[26]  P. Grøttum,et al.  A comparison between ultrasound and a reliable last menstrual period as predictors of the day of delivery in 15 000 examinations , 1996, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[27]  B. Haglund.  Birthweight distributions by gestational age: comparison of LMP-based and ultrasound-based estimates of gestational age using data from the Swedish Birth Registry. , 2007, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[28]  Megan L. Wier,et al.  A comparison of LMP-based and ultrasound-based estimates of gestational age using linked California livebirth and prenatal screening records. , 2007, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[29]  P. Grøttum,et al.  Gestational age in pregnancies conceived after in vitro fertilization: a comparison between age assessed from oocyte retrieval, crown‐rump length and biparietal diameter , 2000, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[30]  H Almström,et al.  Ultrasound dating at 12–14 weeks of gestation. A prospective cross‐validation of established dating formulae in in‐vitro fertilized pregnancies , 2005, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[31]  H. Thaler,et al.  First- and second-trimester ultrasound assessment of gestational age. , 2004, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[32]  R. T. Lie,et al.  Ultrasound estimates of gestational age among perinatally demised: a population‐based study , 2004, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[33]  T. Fehm,et al.  Fetal gender and sonographic assessment of crown–rump length: implications for multifetal pregnancy reduction , 2004, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.