An improved spinning lens test to determine the stiffness of the human lens

It is widely accepted that age-related changes in lens stiffness are significant for the development of presbyopia. However, precise details on the relative importance of age-related changes in the stiffness of the lens, in comparison with other potential mechanisms for the development of presbyopia, have not yet been established. One contributing factor to this uncertainty is the paucity and variability of experimental data on lens stiffness. The available published data generally indicate that stiffness varies spatially within the lens and that stiffness parameters tend to increase with age. However, considerable differences exist between these published data sets, both qualitatively and quantitatively. The current paper describes new and improved methods, based on the spinning lens approach pioneered by Fisher, R.F. (1971) ‘The elastic constants of the human lens’, Journal of Physiology, 212, 147–180, to make measurements on the stiffness of the human lens. These new procedures have been developed in an attempt to eliminate, or at least substantially reduce, various systematic errors in Fisher’s original experiment. An improved test rig has been constructed and a new modelling procedure for determining lens stiffness parameters from observations made during the test has been devised. The experiment involves mounting a human lens on a vertical rotor so that the lens spins on its optical axis (typically at 1000 rpm). An automatic imaging system is used to capture the outline of the lens, while it is rotating, at pre-determined angular orientations. These images are used to quantify the deformations developed in the lens as a consequence of the centripetal forces induced by the rotation. Lens stiffness is inferred using axisymmetric finite element inverse analysis in which a nearly-incompressible neo-Hookean constitutive model is used to represent the mechanics of the lens. A numerical optimisation procedure is used to determine the stiffness parameters that provide a best fit between the finite element model and the experimental data. Sample results are presented for a human lens of age 33 years.

[1]  R. Fisher.  The elastic constants of the human lens , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  F. Verhoeff.  Cataract and Anomalies of the Lens. , 1944 .

[3]  Henk A Weeber,et al.  Dynamic mechanical properties of human lenses. , 2005, Experimental eye research.

[4]  Harvey J. Burd,et al.  Mechanics of accommodation of the human eye , 1999, Vision Research.

[5]  H. Ohde,et al.  Size of the lens nucleus separated by hydrodissection. , 1993, Ophthalmic surgery.

[6]  Rafael Navarro,et al.  Adaptive model of the gradient index of the human lens. I. Formulation and model of aging ex vivo lenses. , 2007, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[7]  Rob G L van der Heijde,et al.  The shape of the human lens nucleus with accommodation. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[8]  W. Charman.  The eye in focus: accommodation and presbyopia , 2008, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[9]  Henk A Weeber,et al.  On the relationship between lens stiffness and accommodative amplitude. , 2007, Experimental eye research.

[10]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Texture and object motion in slant discrimination: failure of reliability-based weighting of cues may be evidence for strong fusion. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[11]  David A Atchison,et al.  In vivo study of changes in refractive index distribution in the human crystalline lens with age and accommodation. , 2008, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[12]  H. J. Burd,et al.  Can reliable values of Young’s modulus be deduced from Fisher’s (1971) spinning lens measurements? , 2006, Vision Research.

[13]  G. R. Cowper,et al.  Gaussian quadrature formulas for triangles , 1973 .

[14]  R. D. Wood,et al.  Nonlinear Continuum Mechanics for Finite Element Analysis , 1997 .

[15]  H. Weeber,et al.  Stiffness gradient in the crystalline lens , 2007, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[16]  N. Brown,et al.  The change in shape and internal form of the lens of the eye on accommodation. , 1973, Experimental eye research.

[17]  H. J. Burd,et al.  Numerical modelling of the accommodating lens , 2002, Vision Research.

[18]  M. Costello,et al.  Morphology of the normal human lens. , 1996, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[19]  R. Truscott,et al.  Massive increase in the stiffness of the human lens nucleus with age: the basis for presbyopia? , 2004, Molecular vision.

[20]  R. Augusteyn.  On the growth and internal structure of the human lens. , 2010, Experimental eye research.

[21]  M. O’Donnell,et al.  Mapping elasticity in human lenses using bubble-based acoustic radiation force. , 2007, Experimental eye research.

[22]  Erik A Hermans,et al.  Constant volume of the human lens and decrease in surface area of the capsular bag during accommodation: an MRI and Scheimpflug study. , 2009, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[23]  R. Truscott,et al.  An impediment to glutathione diffusion in older normal human lenses: a possible precondition for nuclear cataract. , 1998, Experimental eye research.

[24]  Jean-Marie Parel,et al.  Biometry of primate lenses during immersion in preservation media. , 2006, Molecular vision.

[25]  R. Augusteyn.  Growth of the human eye lens , 2006, Molecular vision.

[26]  M. Dubbelman,et al.  Changes in the internal structure of the human crystalline lens with age and accommodation , 2003, Vision Research.

[27]  Gerhard A. Holzapfel,et al.  Nonlinear Solid Mechanics: A Continuum Approach for Engineering Science , 2000 .

[28]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[29]  Holger Lubatschowski,et al.  Femtosecond laser induced flexibility change of human donor lenses , 2009, Vision Research.