From UX to Engagement: Connecting Theory and Practice, Addressing Ethics and Diversity

In the field of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), engagement bears critical significance, not just for informing a design and implementation of the interface, but also for creating improved and advanced interfaces that can adapt to users. While the idea of user engagement is passively being researched in a range of domains, it has been used to various related but diverse concepts. For instance, engagement is the vital element of an effective HCI design. The primary goal of this paper is to introduce relevant research questions related to the engagement domain. The paper studies engagement from four different perspectives: (i) Theory: identifying key issues that aid in building a pluralism of engagement frameworks, (ii) Practice: developing novel methodologies for user engagement and reliable assessment tools, (iii) Ethics: discussing the ethical aspects of engagement especially for designers and developers of humane technologies, (iv) Diversity: investigating individual differences to develop personalized engaging designs and understanding user diversities to provide equal opportunities for user engagement. The discussion will lead to opportunities for the potential researchers to acquire relevant knowledge, assess the mechanisms of engagement and evaluate the current design frameworks.

[1]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Social media as a measurement tool of depression in populations , 2013, WebSci.

[2]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Claiming success, charting the future: micro-HCI and macro-HCI , 2011, INTR.

[3]  Anna L. Cox,et al.  Design Frictions for Mindful Interactions: The Case for Microboundaries , 2016, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[4]  Peter M. Wiemer-Hastings,et al.  Addiction to the Internet and Online Gaming , 2005, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[5]  Xiangshi Ren,et al.  Rethinking the Relationship between Humans and Computers , 2016, Computer.

[6]  Mathias Schlögl,et al.  Time Well Spent. , 2018, Journal of palliative medicine.

[7]  Sebastian Möller,et al.  Assessing the Relationship between Technical Affinity, Stress and Notifications on Smartphones , 2015, MobileHCI Adjunct.

[8]  Liam J. Bannon,et al.  The turn to practice in HCI: towards a research agenda , 2014, CHI.

[9]  Nachiappan Nagappan,et al.  The first hour experience: how the initial play can engage (or lose) new players , 2014, CHI PLAY.

[10]  Boi Faltings,et al.  A Bayesian Approach to Intervention-Based Clustering , 2018, ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol..

[11]  Gabriella Kazai,et al.  Towards a science of user engagement (Position Paper) , 2011 .

[12]  Julie A. Kientz,et al.  What Makes Smartphone Use Meaningful or Meaningless? , 2018, Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol..

[13]  Janet C. Read,et al.  Where HCI meets ACI , 2016, NordiCHI.

[14]  Brenda Laurel,et al.  Computers as theatre , 1991 .

[15]  Huai Liu,et al.  Metamorphic Testing , 2018, ACM Comput. Surv..

[16]  Kostas Karpouzis,et al.  Towards a Real-time Gaze-based Shared Attention for a Virtual Agent , 2008 .

[17]  Paul A. Cairns,et al.  A grounded investigation of game immersion , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[18]  Tom Carey,et al.  Engagement as a Design Concept for Multimedia , 1995 .

[19]  Gavin J. Doherty,et al.  Engagement in HCI , 2018, ACM Comput. Surv..

[20]  Ilyena Hirskyj-Douglas,et al.  On the Internet, Nobody Knows You're a Dog... Unless You're Another Dog , 2019, CHI.

[21]  Elaine Toms,et al.  What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[22]  Heather L. O'Brien,et al.  The influence of hedonic and utilitarian motivations on user engagement: The case of online shopping experiences , 2010, Interact. Comput..

[23]  Charles L. A. Clarke,et al.  Time well spent , 2014, IIiX.

[24]  A. Giddens.  The Constitution of Society , 1985 .

[25]  Zhenxin Wang,et al.  The relationship between flow proneness in everyday life and variations in the volume of gray matter in the dopaminergic system: A cross-sectional study , 2019, Personality and Individual Differences.

[26]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Effects of Individual Differences in Blocking Workplace Distractions , 2018, CHI.

[27]  Yan Liu,et al.  Leveraging and Integrating Eastern and Western Insights for Human Engagement Studies in HCI , 2015, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[28]  Ido Guy,et al.  Increasing engagement through early recommender intervention , 2009, RecSys '09.

[29]  Peng Cheng,et al.  A Framework for Interactive Mindfulness Meditation Using Attention-Regulation Process , 2017, CHI.

[30]  Johan F. Hoorn,et al.  Realism is not all! User engagement with task-related interface characters , 2007, Interact. Comput..

[31]  Huatong Sun.  Global Social Media Design , 2020 .

[32]  J. Read,et al.  The Ethics of How to Work with Dogs in Animal Computer Interaction , 2017 .

[33]  Leon A. Kappelman,et al.  User engagement in the development, implementation, and use of information technologies , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.