Sensitivity of inferences in forensic genetics to assumptions about founding genes

Many forensic genetics problems can be handled using structured systems of discrete variables, for which Bayesian networks offer an appealing practical modeling framework, and allow inferences to be computed by probability propagation methods. However, when standard assumptions are violated—for example, when allele frequencies are unknown, there is identity by descent or the population is heterogeneous—dependence is generated among founding genes, that makes exact calculation of conditional probabilities by propagation methods less straightforward. Here we illustrate different methodologies for assessing sensitivity to assumptions about founders in forensic genetics problems. These include constrained steepest descent, linear fractional programming and representing dependence by structure. We illustrate these methods on several forensic genetics examples involving criminal identification, simple and complex disputed paternity and DNA mixtures.

[1]  Sewall Wright,et al.  Breeding Structure of Populations in Relation to Speciation , 1940, The American Naturalist.

[2]  S WRIGHT,et al.  Genetical structure of populations. , 1950, Nature.

[3]  S WRIGHT,et al.  Genetical Structure of Populations , 1950, British medical journal.

[4]  D. Bartholomew,et al.  Linear Programming: Methods and Applications , 1970 .

[5]  Steven Vajda,et al.  Linear Programming. Methods and Applications , 1964 .

[6]  S. Zionts,et al.  Programming with linear fractional functionals , 1968 .

[7]  D. Blackwell,et al.  Ferguson Distributions Via Polya Urn Schemes , 1973 .

[8]  T. Ferguson.  A Bayesian Analysis of Some Nonparametric Problems , 1973 .

[9]  E A Thompson,et al.  Gene identities and multiple relationships. , 1974, Biometrics.

[10]  Steven Vajda,et al.  Problems In Linear And Non-Linear Programming , 1976 .

[11]  Kathleen Trustrum,et al.  Problems in Linear and Nonlinear Programming , 1976 .

[12]  David J. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Local computations with probabilities on graphical structures and their application to expert systems , 1990 .

[13]  S N Austad.  Forensic DNA typing. , 1992, Science.

[14]  D J Balding,et al.  DNA profile match probability calculation: how to allow for population stratification, relatedness, database selection and single bands. , 1994, Forensic science international.

[15]  Rannala,et al.  The Sampling Theory of Neutral Alleles in an Island Population of Fluctuating Size , 1996, Theoretical population biology.

[16]  A. P. Dawid,et al.  Coherent Analysis of Forensic Identification Evidence , 1996 .

[17]  Avi Pfeffer,et al.  Object-Oriented Bayesian Networks , 1997, UAI.

[18]  K. Ayres,et al.  Allowing for within-subpopulation inbreeding in forensic match probabilities , 1999 .

[19]  David J. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Probabilistic Networks and Expert Systems , 1999, Information Science and Statistics.

[20]  T Egeland,et al.  Beyond traditional paternity and identification cases. Selecting the most probable pedigree. , 2000, Forensic science international.

[21]  P. Green,et al.  Modelling Heterogeneity With and Without the Dirichlet Process , 2001 .

[22]  Dw Van Boxel,et al.  Probabilistic Expert Systems for Forensic Inference from Genetic Markers , 2002 .

[23]  B S Weir,et al.  Dependency effects in multi-locus match probabilities. , 2003, Theoretical population biology.

[24]  Peter M Vallone,et al.  Allele frequencies for 15 autosomal STR loci on U.S. Caucasian, African American, and Hispanic populations. , 2003, Journal of forensic sciences.

[25]  Steffen L. Lauritzen,et al.  Some modern applications of graphical models , 2003 .

[26]  A. Dawid,et al.  Probabilistic expert systems for DNA mixture profiling. , 2003, Theoretical population biology.

[27]  Bruce S Weir,et al.  Matching and partially-matching DNA profiles. , 2004, Journal of forensic sciences.

[28]  Wing K. Fung,et al.  Interpreting DNA Mixtures with Related Contributors in Subdivided Populations , 2004 .

[29]  D. Balding,et al.  A method for quantifying differentiation between populations at multi-allelic loci and its implications for investigating identity and paternity , 2005, Genetica.

[30]  D. Balding,et al.  Paternity index calculations when some individuals share common ancestry. , 2005, Forensic science international.

[31]  Yuval Rabani,et al.  Linear Programming , 2007, Handbook of Approximation Algorithms and Metaheuristics.

[32]  S L Lauritzen,et al.  Identification and separation of DNA mixtures using peak area information. , 2007, Forensic science international.

[33]  J Mortera,et al.  Object-oriented Bayesian networks for complex forensic DNA profiling problems. , 2007, Forensic science international.

[34]  Yun S. Song,et al.  A graphical approach to multi-locus match probability computation: revisiting the product rule. , 2007, Theoretical population biology.

[35]  Bruce S Weir,et al.  THE RARITY OF DNA PROFILES. , 2007, The annals of applied statistics.

[36]  Steffen L. Lauritzen,et al.  A gamma model for {DNA} mixture analyses , 2007 .

[37]  Lakhmi C. Jain,et al.  Introduction to Bayesian Networks , 2008 .

[38]  C. Fuchs.  Discussion of: Statistical analysis of an archeological find , 2008, 0804.0088.

[39]  Steffen L. Lauritzen,et al.  Probabilistic Expert Systems , 2010 .